UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant Toto Section 14 (a)14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the registrantRegistrant  ☒                              Filed by a partyParty other than the registrantt
he R
egistrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 Preliminary proxy statementProxy Statement
 
Confidential, for useUse of the Commission onlyOnly (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 Definitive proxy statementProxy Statement
 Definitive additional materialsAdditional Materials
 Soliciting material pursuant to § 240.14a-12.Material under
Section 240.14a-12

Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in itsIn Its Charter)

(Name of Person (s)Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box)Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

  No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) Rules
14a-6(i)(1)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

0-11


LOGO

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

March 30, 2023

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. to be held at the company’s headquarters located at 15415 Katy Freeway,

Houston, Texas 77094, on Wednesday, May 10, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. local time. Details regarding the meeting are provided in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement. We urge you to read this information carefully.

We would like to highlight several of the ways our Board of Directors and management team have been working on your behalf this past year:

Operational Excellence: During 2022, we were awarded significant new work from our customers at improving dayrates, adding $1.3 billion of new backlog, including a new contract that allowed us to reactivate our ultra-deepwater harsh environment semisubmersible Ocean GreatWhite. In addition, in 2022 we continued operating at high levels of fleet utilization and operating efficiency, while achieving our best safety performance in the last four years.

Robust Stockholder Engagement: In March 2022, we relisted our shares of common stock on the NYSE and expanded our stockholder engagement efforts, meeting with a broad range of stockholders and investors throughout the year. After relisting, our stock price appreciated by more than 38% during the remainder of 2022 and by approximately 49% through our March 14, 2023 annual meeting record date.

Board Composition: Our Board is focused on maintaining a balance of leadership, diverse perspectives, relevant strategic skill sets and professional experience. Seven of our eight current directors (and both of our director nominees for election at the annual meeting) are independent. Diversity at our company is evolving, and our Board is leading by example. Two years ago, our Board did not include any gender, racial or ethnic diversity. Now, over 37% of the directors serving on our Board are either female or racially or ethnically diverse. In addition, in furtherance of our commitment to stockholder rights and strong governance, at the annual meeting we are proposing to amend our Certificate of Incorporation to declassify our Board.

Focus on Operating Responsibly and Sustainably: Both the Board and the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee of the Board are focused on providing strong oversight of the company’s corporate responsibility efforts. During 2022, the company published our first Sustainability Report on our company website and made progress in reducing fuel usage and the carbon footprint of our rigs.

On behalf of the Board and management, we appreciate your trust, support and participation.

Sincerely,

LOGO

LOGO

Neal P. Goldman

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

Chairman of the Board

President and Chief Executive Officer


LOGO

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held Onon May 15, 2019

To our Stockholders:10, 2023

The 2019 annual meeting of stockholders of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. will be held at the officesoffice of Loews Corporation, 667 Madison Avenue, New York, New York,the company located at 15415 Katy Freeway, Houston, Texas 77094, on Wednesday, May 15, 2019,10, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. local time, for the following purposes:purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:

 

(1)

To elect eight directors, each to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal;

To elect two Class II directors, each to serve until our annual meeting of stockholders in 2026 and until his/her respective successor is duly elected and qualified or until his/her earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal;

 

(2)

To hold an advisory vote on executive compensation;

To hold an advisory vote on executive compensation;

 

(3)

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent auditor for our company and its subsidiaries for fiscal year 2019; and

To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation;

 

(4)

To transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournments thereof.

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent auditor for our company and its subsidiaries for fiscal year 2023;

To approve amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors; and

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements.

Our stockholders of record at the close of business on March 20, 201914, 2023 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting and any adjournments of the annual meeting.or postponements. Additional information regarding the annual meeting is included in the attached proxy statement.

Your vote is important.important. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting in person, please vote as promptly as possible by using the internetInternet or telephone as instructed on your enclosed proxy card, or, if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, by signing, dating and returning the included proxy card. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the Class II director nominees recommended by your Board on the proxy card, FOR the resolution approving executive compensation, FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditor for fiscal year 2023 and FOR the amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to declassify our Board. In addition, our Board recommends to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation EVERY YEAR.

 

March 30, 2023

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

Sincerely,

LOGO

David L. Roland

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

April 3, 2019

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on May 15, 2019.10, 2023:

Our proxy statement, proxy card and 20182022 annual report to stockholders are available at

www.diamondoffshore.com/proxywww.proxydocs.com/DO.


Table of Contents

 

About the Annual MeetingProxy Statement Summary

   1 

Stock Ownership of Principal StockholdersQuestions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting

   4 

Stock Ownership of Principal Stockholders

9

Stock Ownership of Management and Directors

   510 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

6

Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1)

   711

Overview of Changes to our Board of Directors and Corporate Governance Structure since 2021

11

Director Nominees

11 

Director Independence

   915 

Board Committees

   1116 

Board Diversity and Director Nominating Process

   12

Majority Vote Standard for Election of Directors

1418 

Executive Sessions ofNon-Management Independent Directors

   1419 

Board Leadership Structure

   1419 

Board Oversight of Risk Management

   1420 

Director Attendance at Meetings

   1521 

Director Compensation

   1521 

Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines

   1623

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Focus

24 

Loans to Directors and Executive Officers

   1725

Prohibitions Against Hedging and Pledging

25 

Reporting of Ethics and Compliance Concerns

   1725

Public Policy Engagement and Political Activities

25 

Transactions with Related Persons

   1725 

Audit Committee Report

   1927 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

   2028 

Executive Summary

   2028 

Compensation Philosophy and Program Objectives

   2129 

Elements of Compensation

   2330 

Indemnification of Directors and Executive Officers

   3239 

Risk Management Considerations

   3239 

Employment Agreements

   3340 

Compensation Committee Report

   3341 

Executive Compensation

   3442 

20182022 Summary Compensation Table

   3442 

20182022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

   3745

2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

46

Stock Plan

47

Equity Compensation Plan Information

47

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2022

48

2022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

48

2022 Pay Versus Performance

49 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

   37

Equity Plan

43

Equity Compensation Plan Information

43

2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

44

Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End 2018

46

2018 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

4753 

CEO Pay Ratio

   4756 

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Proposal No. 2)

   4958 

Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation (Proposal No. 3)

59

Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor (Proposal No. 3)4)

   5060 

Audit Fees

   5060 

Auditor Engagement andPre-Approval Policy

   5060 

Solicitation ExpensesApproval of Amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to Declassify our Board (Proposal No. 5)

   5161 

Solicitation Expenses

63

Communications with Diamond Offshore and Others

   5163 

Other MattersStockholder Proposals and Nominations for our 2024 Annual Meeting

   5263

Other Matters

64

Appendix A

A-1 


LOGO

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

15415 KATY FREEWAY

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77094

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

For the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

to be held on May 15, 201910, 2023

This summary is included to provide an introduction and overview of certain of the information in this proxy statement. This is a summary only and does not contain all of the information we have included in this proxy statement. You should refer to the full proxy statement for more information about us and the proposals you are being asked to consider.

ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETINGDIAMOND OFFSHORE

Why am I receiving these materials?

The Board of Directors of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (which we refer to in this proxy statement as we, our, us, Diamond Offshore, our company or the company) is a leader in offshore drilling, providing innovation, thought leadership and contract drilling services to solve complex deepwater challenges around the globe. We provide contract drilling services to the energy industry with a fleet of 14 floater rigs (four owned drillships, eight semisubmersibles and two managed rigs). Additional information is available at http://www.diamondoffshore.com/.

DIRECTOR NOMINEES*

Since our emergence from our Chapter 11 reorganization in April 2021, our Board of Directors (or Board) has been classified into three staggered classes, designated as Class I, Class II and Class III, with one class of directors standing for election each year. Upon the recommendation of the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee (or the NG&S Committee), the Board adopted, subject to stockholder approval at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders (which we refer to as the Annual Meeting), amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board and institute annual elections of directors on a phased-in basis. See “Approval of Amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to Declassify our Board (Proposal No. 5).”

Our current Class II directors serve for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting, and one of our current Class II directors has been nominated to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting to serve until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2026. The other Class II director nominee for election at the Annual Meeting does not currently serve on our Board. The director nominees for the Annual Meeting are set forth below:

Name

  Position  Age  Gender  Director
Since
  Committees
  Audit  Comp  NG&S  Special

Patrice Douglas

    60  Female          

Neal P. Goldman

  COB  53  Male  2021  X  Chair  X  X

*

Both director nominees are independent.

Key: COB – Chairman of the Board; Chair – Committee Chairman

1


CURRENT BOARD DIVERSITY

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

2022 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

We believe that strong corporate governance is essential and supports the long-term success of our business. Our Board and its committees help set the tone for our company, and our management devotes time and attention to matters of corporate responsibility, including environmental, social and governance (or ESG) matters. Our NG&S Committee has primary oversight for our ethics and governance efforts. We strive to implement corporate governance policies and structures that reflect best practices, including:

7 of our 8 current directors are independent

Independent chairs of the Board and Audit, Compensation and NG&S Committees

100% of the Board has been refreshed since 2021

Regular executive sessions of independent directors

Separation of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, positions

3 of our 8 current directors are female and/or racially/ethnically diverse

Risk oversight by full Board and committees, including the NG&S Committee overseeing ESG matters and initiatives

Annual Board and committee assessments

Prohibition of pledging and hedging transactions related to our equity securities by directors and executive officers

Active and ongoing stakeholder engagement

No poison pill

If the declassification proposal is approved by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting, all directors will be elected annually after a three-year phase-in period

Director access to experts and advisors

Robust Code of Business Conduct for directors, officers and employees

Annual say-on-pay vote for stockholders

An annual Sustainability Report published on our website

2022 COMPENSATION PROGRAMS AND PRACTICES

At our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, our company received strong support for our executive compensation programs, with 92% of votes cast approving, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation.

2


In 2022, as in prior years, our Compensation Committee considered the results of the say-on-pay vote in its review of our compensation program and policies and determined to continue with a compensation program that we believe is thoughtful, consistent and aligns with the company’s business strategies. We generally strive to align pay with company performance and to link the majority of pay for executives to long-term business strategies and key priorities. We measure incentive performance against challenging goals that are aligned with our key business priorities. We discourage imprudent risk taking by avoiding undue emphasis on any one metric or short-term goal.

Certain other key features of our executive compensation program include:

No tax gross-ups for executive officers

“Double trigger” change in control benefits

No non-CEO executive employment contracts

Independent compensation consultant hired by and reporting to our Compensation Committee

Pay for performance philosophy weighted towards variable at-risk performance-based compensation

Effective balance between differentiated short-term and long-term compensation incentives and performance goals

Employ a robust goal-setting process to align goals with company strategy

Cap annual cash incentive payment for executive officers

Prohibit executive officers from hedging or pledging company stock

No excessive perquisites, benefits or severance benefits

3


LOGO

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

For the Annual Meeting of Stockholders

to be held on May 10, 2023

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

Why am I receiving these materials, and when and where will the meeting be held?

Our Board is providing you these proxy materials in connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies from our stockholders for our 2019 annual meetingAnnual Meeting to be held at the office of stockholders (which we refer to as the Annual Meeting)company located at 15415 Katy Freeway, Houston, Texas 77094, on Wednesday, May 10, 2023, commencing at 8:30 a.m. local time, and any adjournments and postponements of the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be heldThis proxy statement summarizes information related to your vote at the offices of Loews Corporation, 667 Madison Avenue, New York, New York, on Wednesday, May 15, 2019, commencing at 8:30 a.m. local time. On or before April 3, 2019, we expectAnnual Meeting.

We intend to begin mailing to our stockholders proxy materials on or an Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (which we refer to as a Notice), containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our Annual Report, by the Internet and how to vote your shares. If you receive a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you specifically request it.about March 30, 2023. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you may submit a proxy to vote your shares by the Internet, telephonephone or mail as more fully described below.

If it is not possible or advisable to hold the Annual Meeting in person as planned, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the Annual Meeting solely by means of remote communication. Any such change, including details on how to participate and vote in a remote Annual Meeting, would be announced in advance, and details would be posted on our website at www.diamondoffshore.com and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (or the SEC). It is important that you retain a copy of your Control Number found on the proxy card or voting instruction form, as such number will be required to gain access to any remote Annual Meeting. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting.

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?Meeting, and how does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

At

Voting Item

Board Recommendation

Reason for Recommendation

1. Election of Two Class II Directors

FOR each nominee listed below and on the enclosed proxy card

The Class II director nominees were recommended to the Board by our NG&S Committee. The Board believes the recommended nominees possess the skills and expertise necessary to successfully oversee the implementation of our strategic plans for the benefit of stockholders, employees and other stakeholders.

2. Approve Executive Compensation

FOR

The Board believes our executive compensation programs are reasonable and effectively align executive compensation with performance.

3. Recommend Frequency of Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

EVERY YEAR

An annual vote will provide stockholders a regular opportunity to provide input on our compensation policies and programs.

4. Ratify Appointment of Independent Auditors

FOR

As recommended by the Audit Committee.

4


Voting Item

Board Recommendation

Reason for Recommendation

5. Approve Amendments to Certificate of Incorporation to Declassify Board

FOR

As recommended by the NG&S Committee. Enabling annual votes on all directors is consistent with our commitment to stockholder rights and strong corporate governance.

Who is soliciting my proxy?

Our Board is soliciting proxies on our behalf using the Annual Meeting, you and our other stockholders entitledenclosed proxy card to votebe voted at the Annual Meeting are requestedMeeting. All costs of soliciting the proxies will be paid by the company. Copies of solicitation materials will be furnished to vote on proposalsbanks, brokers, nominees and other fiduciaries and custodians to elect eight membersforward to beneficial owners of our Boardcommon stock held by such persons. We will reimburse such persons for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in forwarding solicitation materials. In addition to solicitations by mail, some of Directors to serve until our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, to approve executivethe company’s directors, officers and other employees, without extra compensation, might supplement this solicitation by advisory vote and to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditor for fiscal year 2019.telephone, personal conversation or other communication.

Who is entitled to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only stockholdersholders of record as of our common stock at the close of business on March 20, 2019,14, 2023, the record date for the Annual Meeting (or the Record Date), or the holders of their valid proxies may attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. A list of our stockholders will be available for review at our executive offices in Houston, Texas during ordinary business hours for a period of 10 days prior to the meeting. Each person attending the Annual Meeting may be asked to present a photo ID before being admitted to the meeting. In addition, stockholders who hold their shares through a broker or nominee (i.e.(i.e., in street name) should be prepared to provide proof of their beneficial ownership, such as a brokerage statement showing their ownership of shares as of March 20, 2019. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting, and attendees will be subject to security inspections.14, 2023.

Only holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 20, 2019 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held. Shares of our common stock represented in person or by a properly submitted proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting. OnAt the record date, 137,580,203close of business on the Record Date, there were 101,416,965 shares of our common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. Common stock is our only class of stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

What constitutes a quorum?

The presence at the Annual Meeting, whether in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.

WhatHow do I vote?

Stockholders of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If you are a stockholder of record, there are several ways for you to vote your shares. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by the enclosed proxy card prior to the Annual Meeting to ensure that your vote is requiredcounted.

Via the Internet: You may vote at the website listed on the enclosed proxy card 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Have your enclosed proxy card available when you access the website and use the Control Number shown on your proxy card.

By Telephone: You may vote using a touch-tone telephone by calling the toll-free number listed on the enclosed proxy card 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Have your enclosed proxy card available when you call and use the Control Number shown on your proxy card.

5


By Mail: You may vote using your enclosed proxy card by completing, signing, dating, and returning the proxy card in the self-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided. If you properly complete your enclosed proxy card and send it to us in time to vote, your proxy (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares as you have directed.

In Person: You may vote in person during the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Agent

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you should have received a proxy card and voting instructions with proxy materials from that organization rather than directly from us. Please check with your bank, broker or other agent and follow the voting instructions they provide to approvevote your shares. Generally, you will have three options for returning your proxy.

By Method Listed on Your Voting Instruction Card: Please refer to your voting instruction card or other information provided by your broker, bank or other agent to determine whether you may vote by telephone or electronically on the Internet and follow the instructions on the voting instruction card or other information provided by your broker, bank or other agent. Many banks and brokerage firms offer Internet and telephone voting. If your bank, broker or other agent does not offer Internet or telephone voting information, please follow the other voting instructions they provide to vote your shares.

By Mail: You may vote by signing, dating and returning your voting instruction card in the pre-addressed envelope provided by your broker, bank or other agent.

In Person: To vote during the Annual Meeting, you may be required to obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other agent. Follow the instructions from your broker, bank or other agent included with the proxy materials or contact your broker, bank or other agent to request the proxy form authorizing you to vote the shares.

If you receive multiple proxy cards from the company or your broker, bank or other agent, this usually indicates that your shares are held in more than one account, such as two brokerage accounts and are registered in different names. You should complete and return each item to be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

Election of Directors. A nominee for director will be elected to the Board if all votes cast for that nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against his or her election. Under our Bylaws, any incumbent director nominee who does not receive a majority of the votes cast for election shall tender his or her resignation. For a more complete explanationproxy cards to ensure that all of this requirement and process, please see “Election of Directors—Majority Vote Standard for Election of Directors” below.

Votes Required to Adopt Other Proposals. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of theyour shares are voted. Unless you revoke your proxy, your shares of common stock presentrepresented by your proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions given in your proxy.

How will my shares be voted if I do not specify how they should be voted?

If you are a stockholder of record and you indicate when voting in person, on the Internet or represented by proxy and entitledtelephone that you wish to vote as recommended by the Board, then your shares will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the Board’s recommendation on all matters presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting is requiredMeeting. Similarly, if you sign and return the enclosed proxy card but do not indicate how you want to vote your shares for approvala particular proposal or for all proposals, then for any proposal for which you do not so indicate, your shares will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendation.

If you are a beneficial owner of all other items being submitted to stockholders for consideration.

How are abstentionsshares held in street name and brokernon-votes counted?

Abstentions and brokernon-votes (i.e.,do not provide the organization that holds your shares with respectspecific voting instructions, then the organization that holds your shares may generally vote your shares in its discretion on “routine” matters but cannot vote on “non-routine” matters. If the organization that holds your shares does not receive instructions from you on how to whichvote your shares on a broker indicatesnon-routine matter, that organization will inform the Inspector of Election that it does not have the authority to vote on that matter with respect to your shares. This is generally referred to as a matter) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum“broker non-vote.”

If any other matter is presentpresented at the Annual Meeting. AbstentionsMeeting, your proxy will not affect the outcomevote in accordance with his or her best judgment. As of the electiondate of directors. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes against any matter other than the electionthis proxy statement, we know of directors. Brokernon-votes will not affect the outcome of the election of directors or any other proposalno matters that need to be votedacted on at the Annual Meeting.

How does the Board recommend that I vote?

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote:

FOR each of the nominees for director namedMeeting other than those discussed in this proxy statement;statement.

 

6


FOR the resolution approving executive compensation; and

FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditor for fiscal year 2019.

How do I vote and canCan I change my vote after I return my proxy card?

You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or you may give us your proxy. We recommend that you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. As described below, you can change your vote at the Annual Meeting. You can vote by proxy over the telephone by calling a toll-free number, electronically by using the Internet or through the mail as described below. If you would like to vote by telephone or by using the Internet, please refer to the specific instructions set forth on the Notice or proxy card. If you are a holder of record and received your proxy statement and Annual Report by mail, you can vote by signing, dating and completing the enclosed proxy card and returning it by mail in the enclosed postpaid envelope. If you received a Notice and wish to vote by traditional proxy card, you may receive a full printed set of the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting at no charge through one of the following methods:

by the Internet atwww.investorelections.com/DO;

by telephone at1-866-648-8133; or

by sending a blanke-mail topaper@investorelections.com with the 12 digit control number (located in the Notice) in the subject line. No other requests, instructions or other inquiries should be included with youre-mail requesting material.

Once you receive the proxy statement, Annual Report and proxy card, please sign, date and complete the proxy card and return it in the enclosed postpaid envelope. No postage is necessary if the proxy card is mailed in the United States. If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, it will provide you separate instructions for voting your shares.

Your proxy may be revoked at any time before its exercise by sendingsigning, dating and delivering written notice of revocation to David L. Roland, Corporate Secretary, Diamond Offshore, 15415 Katy Freeway, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77094, or by submitting a valid proxy that is dated later, or, if you attend the Annual Meeting in person, by givingsubmitting notice of revocation to the Inspector of Election referred to below atduring the Annual Meeting.

Unless you revoke your proxy, your shares of common stock represented by your proxy will be voted at the annual meeting in accordance with the directions given in your proxy. If you do not specify a choice on your proxy, your proxy will be voted consistent with the above recommendations of the Board.

How will votes be recorded and where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

Votes will be tabulated by Mediant Communications Inc., and the results will be certified by our Inspector of Election. In tabulating votes, the Inspector of Election will make a record of the number of shares voted for or against each nominee and each other matter voted upon, the number of shares abstaining with respect to each nominee or other matter, and the number of shares held of record by broker-dealers that are present at the Annual Meeting but not voting. We plan to announce preliminary voting results atduring the Annual Meeting and to publish the final results in a current report on Form8-K following the Annual Meeting.

What vote is required to approve each item to be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

Election of Directors. A plurality of the votes cast is required for the election of directors. Accordingly, the two valid nominees for election as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting who receive the most “For” votes among votes properly cast for election will be elected.

Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation. For the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation (Proposal No. 3), the option of every one year, every two years or every three years that receives the highest number of votes cast will be the recommendation of the stockholders considered by the Board.

Declassification of Board. The affirmative vote of the holders of at least 2/3 of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the Record Date is required to approve the amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board (Proposal No. 5).

Votes Required to Adopt Other Proposals. The affirmative vote of shares of common stock representing a majority of the votes cast (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes) by the holders of shares present and entitled to vote on the matter is required to approve each of the other proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

How are abstentions and broker non-votes counted?

Abstentions and broker non-votes (i.e., shares with respect to which a broker indicates that it does not have authority to vote on a matter) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote “against” the proposal to amend our Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board. Shares that are voted to abstain and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the voting for directors or the outcome of the voting for any other proposal.

Conduct of the Meeting

The Chairman has broad responsibility and legal authority to conduct the Annual Meeting in an orderly and timely manner. This authority includes establishing rules of conduct and procedures for stockholders who wish to attend the meeting. In fairness to all stockholders in attendance, and in the interest of conducting a fair,

7


informative, orderly and constructive meeting, the rules must be followed and will be enforced. Copies of the rules will be available at the Annual Meeting. Below are some of the rules that will apply:

Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting, and attendees will be subject to security inspections. Recording of the Annual Meeting or the Q&A session following the Annual Meeting is prohibited without the written consent of the company.

In accordance with our Bylaws, only the proposals properly noticed and listed in the proxy statement will be brought before the Annual Meeting. Any proposal or nomination not timely and properly submitted is out of order and will be barred from consideration.

Only questions submitted by email and received prior to the Annual Meeting will be addressed after the formal business of the Annual Meeting. For more information, see “Submitting a Question for the Annual Meeting” below.

Submitting a Question for the Annual Meeting

After the formal business of the Annual Meeting, as time allows, we will address properly-submitted questions from stockholders regarding the company. Stockholders who desire to submit a question for the Annual Meeting must submit the question by email to ir@dodi.comprior to the Annual Meeting, identifying their name and organization. Only questions submitted and received prior to the Annual Meeting will be addressed during the meeting. Questions from multiple stockholders on the same topic or that are otherwise related may be grouped, summarized and answered together. We will not address any questions that are not appropriate or relevant for the Annual Meeting, which could include, among other things, questions that we determine are:

irrelevant to the business of the company or to the business of the Annual Meeting;

related to material non-public information of the company;

related to personal matters or grievances or are in furtherance of the stockholder’s personal or business interests;

include derogatory references or that are otherwise in bad taste;

relate to pending or threatened litigation;

proposals or director nominations that were not properly and timely submitted; or

out of order or not otherwise suitable for the conduct of the Annual Meeting.

If a stockholder has questions that are not answered during the meeting, the stockholder can contact the company’s Investor Relations Department at (281) 647-4035 or ir@dodi.com after the Annual Meeting.

8


STOCK OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table shows certain information as of March 20, 2019 (unless otherwise indicated)1, 2023 as to all persons who, to our knowledge, were the beneficial owners of 5% or more of our common stock, which iswas our only outstanding class of voting securities.securities as of such date. The information provided below with respect to the stockholders has been furnished to us by or on behalf of the stockholders, and we have not sought to independently verify such information. All shares reported were owned beneficially by the persons indicated unless otherwise indicated below.

 

Title of Class

  

Name and Address of

Beneficial Owner

  Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
  Percent
of Class
 

Common Stock

  Loews Corporation   73,119,047(1)   53.2
  667 Madison Avenue   
  New York, NY 10065-8087   

Common Stock

  BlackRock, Inc.   8,630,005(2)   6.3
  55 East 52nd Street   
  New York, NY 10055   

Common Stock

  FMR LLC   7,462,592(3)   5.4
  245 Summer Street   
  Boston, MA 02210   

Name and Address

 Amount
Beneficially Owned
  Percent
of Class
 

Contrarius Investment Management Limited

2 Bond Street

St. Helier, Jersey JE2 3NP

Channel Islands

  8,983,909 (1)   8.87

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

  8,080,734 (2)   7.98

KGH Ltd

Caves Point, 3C West Bay Street

Nassau, Bahamas

  7,249,478 (3)   7.16

Wellington Management Group LLP

c/o Wellington Management Company LLP

280 Congress Street

Boston, MA 02210

 

 

 

 

6,704,785 

 

(4) 

 

 

 

 

6.62

 

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

  5,703,595 (5)   5.63

Capital World Investors

333 South Hope Street, 55th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071

  5,273,358 (6)   5.20

 

(1)

Loews Corporation (which we refer to as Loews) has sole investment powerBased on the Schedule 13G jointly filed by Contrarius Investment Management Limited and soleContrarius Investment Management (Bermuda) Limited with the SEC on February 7, 2023, Contrarius Investment Management Limited and Contrarius Investment Management (Bermuda) Limited shared voting and dispositive power over theall of such shares. The address for Contrarius Investment Management Limited is 2 Bond Street, St. Helier, Jersey JE2 3NP, Channel Islands. The address for Contrarius Investment Management (Bermuda) Limited is Waterloo House, 100 Pitts Bay Road, Pembroke HM 08 Bermuda.

(2)

This information is basedBased on athe Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 2)13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (which we refer to as the SEC) on February 4, 2019 by BlackRock, Inc., a parent holding company for a number of investment management subsidiaries, which indicates that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 8,387,520 shares and sole dispositive power over 8,630,005 shares.

(3)

This information is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019 by FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson, which reported that FMR LLC has3, 2023, BlackRock, Inc. had sole voting power with respect to 725,525 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 7,462,592 shares, and Abigail P. Johnson has sole voting power with respect to noneover 7,772,662 of such shares and sole dispositive power over all of such shares.

(3)

Based on the Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 1) jointly filed by KGH Ltd, Key Group Holdings Master Fund SPC for and on behalf of KGH Market Neutral Strategies Master SP, Millinvest, Ltd. and Sunil Jagwani with respect to 7,462,592the SEC on February 14, 2023, KGH Ltd, Millinvest, Ltd. and Sunil Jagwani shared voting and dispositive power over all of such shares and Key Group Holdings Master Fund SPC for and on behalf of KGH Market Neutral Strategies Master SP shared voting and dispositive power over 6,078,582 of such shares. The address for each of KGH Ltd, Millinvest, Ltd. and Sunil Jagwani is Caves Point, 3C West Bay Street, Nassau, Bahamas. The address for Key Group Holdings Master Fund SPC for and on behalf of KGH Market Neutral Strategies Master SP is c/o Intertrust, One Nexus Way, Camana Bay, Grand Cayman KY1-9005, Cayman Islands.

(4)

Based on the Schedule 13G further states that members ofjointly filed by Wellington Management Group LLP, Wellington Group Holdings LLP, Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP and Wellington Management Company LLP with the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC, representing 49% of theSEC on February 6, 2023, Wellington Management Group LLP, Wellington Group Holdings LLP and Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP shared voting power over 6,432,111 of FMR LLC. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders’ voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting commonsuch shares and the executionshared dispositive power over all of the shareholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of thesuch shares, owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act, or Fidelity Funds, advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company, or FMR Co, a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. FMR Co carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees.

Loews is a holding company, with principal subsidiaries (in addition to us) consisting of CNA Financial Corporation, an 89%-owned subsidiary engaged in commercial property and casualty insurance; Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, a wholly-owned subsidiary engaged in the transportation and storage of natural gas and natural gas liquids; Loews Hotels & Co, a wholly-owned subsidiary engaged in the operation of a chain of hotels; and Consolidated Container Company LLC, a 99%-owned subsidiary providing packaging solutions to end markets such as beverage, food and household chemicals.

Because Loews holds a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock, Loews has the power to approve matters submitted for consideration at the Annual Meeting without regard to the votes of the other stockholders. We understand that Loews intends to vote consistent with the above recommendations of the Board of Directors. There are no agreements between us and Loews with respect to the election of our directors or officers or with respect to the other matters that may come before the Annual Meeting.9


and Wellington Management Company LLP shared voting power over 6,318,744 of such shares and shared dispositive power over 6,518,289 of such shares. The address for each of Wellington Management Group LLP, Wellington Group Holdings LLP, Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP and Wellington Management Company LLP is c/o Wellington Management Company LLP, 280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210.

(5)

Based on the Schedule 13G filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on February 9, 2023, The Vanguard Group shared voting power over 71,073 of such shares, had sole dispositive power over 5,546,150 of such shares and shared dispositive power over 157,445 of such shares.

(6)

Based on the Schedule 13G filed by Capital World Investors with the SEC on February 13, 2023, Capital World Investors had sole voting power and sole dispositive power over all of such shares.

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS

The following table shows the shares of our common stock and common stockbeneficially owned as of Loews (which we refer to as Loews Common Stock) beneficially ownedMarch 1, 2023 by each of our current directors and director nominees, each of our executive officers named in the20182022 Summary Compensation Table below, and all our current directors and executive officers as a group. Each such director, nominee and executive officer individually, and all of our current directors and executive officers as a group, as of March 1, 2019. Our directors and executive officers individually and as a group ownowned less than 1% of our common stock. Except as otherwise noted, the named beneficial owner hashad sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to the number(s)number of shares shown below. The number of shares included with respect to stock appreciation rights (SARs) granted under our Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (which we refer to as our Equity Plan) is the number of shares of our common stock each person would have received had they exercised their SARs, based on the fair market value per share ($10.70) of our common stock, determined in accordance with the terms of our Equity Plan, on March 1, 2019.

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Shares of Our
Common Stock
   Shares of Loews
Common Stock
   % of Loews
Common Stock
 

James S. Tisch (1)

   5,052    17,063,053    5.5% 

Marc Edwards (2)

   94,334    —      *    

Charles L. Fabrikant (3)

   1,052    1,200    *    

Anatol Feygin

   —      —      *    

Paul G. Gaffney II (4)

   10,052    —      *    

Edward Grebow (5)

   7,052    1,500    *    

Kenneth I. Siegel (6)

   52    148,204    *    

Clifford M. Sobel (5)

   52    —      *    

Andrew H. Tisch (7)

   52    16,222,957    5.3% 

Ronald Woll (8)

   26,717    —      *    

Scott L. Kornblau (8)

   3,856    —      *    

David L. Roland (9)

   16,112    —      *    

Thomas M. Roth

   5,399    —      *    

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (13 persons, including those listed above other than Mr. Feygin)

   174,737    33,436,914    10.9% 

 

*

Name of Beneficial Owner

Shares of our
Common Stock

Patrice Douglas

—  

Benjamin C. Duster, IV

—  

Neal P. Goldman

—  

John H. Hollowell

—  

Raj V. Iyer

—  

Ane Launy

—  

Patrick Carey Lowe

—  

Adam C. Peakes

—  

Bernie Wolford, Jr. (1)

688,932

David L. Roland (2)

36,119

Dominic A. Savarino (3)

27,569

Less

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (10 persons, including those listed above other than 1% of the Loews Common Stock.Ms. Douglas)

752,620

 

(1)

The number ofIncludes (i) 614,858 shares of our common stock includes 52issued in connection with the vesting of restricted stock and (ii) 74,074 unvested shares of time-vesting restricted stock, each representing one share of our common stock.

(2)

Includes (i) 35,309 shares of our common stock issued in connection with the vesting of restricted stock units (or RSUs) and (ii) 810 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of SARs granted under our Equity Plan that are exercisable at March 1, 2019 or within 60 days thereafter. The number of shares of Loews Common Stock includes 413,773 shares of Loews Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of awards granted under the Loews Corporation Stock Option Planwarrants that are currently exercisable. The number ofFractional shares of Loews Common Stock also includes 14,997,854 shares held by trusts of which Mr. Tisch ishave been rounded to the managing trustee (inclusive of 7,872,043 shares held in trust for his benefit) and 820,000 shares held by a charitable foundation as to which Mr. Tisch has shared voting and investment power.nearest whole share.

(2)(3)

The number ofIncludes (i) 25,309 shares of our common stock represents shares issued in connection with restricted stock units.

(3)

The numberthe vesting of RSUs and (ii) 2,260 shares of our common stock includes 52 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of SARs granted under our Equity Plan that are exercisable at March 1, 2019 or within 60 days thereafter. The number of shares of Loews Common Stock includes 600 shares held by a trust of which Mr. Fabrikant and his sister are the trustees and share voting and investment power.

(4)

The number of shares of our common stock includes 7,000 shares held by a trust of which Mr. Gaffney is the trustee and 3,000 shares held by a trust of which his spouse is the trustee. The number of shares of our common stock also includes 52 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of SARs granted under our Equity Plan that are exercisable at March 1, 2019 or within 60 days thereafter.

(5)

The number of shares of our common stock includes 52 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of SARs granted under our Equity Plan that are exercisable at March 1, 2019 or within 60 days thereafter.

(6)

The number of shares of our common stock includes 52 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of SARs granted under our Equity Plan that are exercisable at March 1, 2019 or within 60 days thereafter. The number of shares

of Loews Common Stock represents 148,204 shares of Loews Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock awards granted under the Loews Corporation Stock Option Planwarrants that are currently exercisable.

(7)

The number of Fractional shares of our common stock includes 52 shares of common stock issuable uponhave been rounded to the exercise of SARs granted under our Equity Plan that are exercisable at March 1, 2019 or within 60 days thereafter. The number of shares of Loews Common Stock includes 413,773 shares of Loews Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock awards granted under the Loews Corporation Stock Option Plan that are currently exercisable. The number of shares of Loews Common Stock also includes 14,809,184 shares held by trusts of which Mr. Tisch is the managing trustee (inclusive of 7,691,285 shares held in trust for his benefit) and 1,000,000 shares held by a charitable foundation as to which Mr. Tisch has shared voting and investment power.

(8)

The number of shares of our common stock represents shares issued in connection with restricted stock units, as to which the executive officer shares voting and investment power with his spouse.

(9)

The number of shares of our common stock represents 15,302 shares issued in connection with restricted stock units, as to which Mr. Roland shares voting and investment power with his spouse, and 810 shares held by virtue of Mr. Roland’s investment in our common stock pursuant to our Retirement Plan (as defined below).nearest whole share.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based solely on our records and other information available to us, we believe that during 2018 all reports that were required to be filed by our directors and executive officers under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (which we refer to as the Exchange Act), were timely filed.10


ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Proposal No. 1)

OurOverview of Changes to our Board of Directors and Corporate Governance Structure since 2021

On April 26, 2020, we and 14 of our subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (or the Bankruptcy Court). On April 8, 2021, the Bankruptcy Court entered a written order in our chapter 11 reorganization confirming our Joint Plan of Reorganization (or our Joint Plan), and on April 23, 2021, our Joint Plan became effective and we emerged from bankruptcy. Effective upon our emergence, all of our existing directors resigned from the Board and all Board committees and the following six directors designated by our Ad Hoc Group of Senior Noteholders (as defined in our Joint Plan) were appointed to our Board: Neal P. Goldman, John H. Hollowell, Raj V. Iyer, Ane Launy, Patrick Carey Lowe and Adam C. Peakes.

In addition, effective upon our emergence in April 2021, our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws were amended to, among other things, classify our Board into three classes, designated as Class I, Class II and Class III, with one class of directors standing for election each year. The initial Class I directors served for an initial term that expired at our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders and, following the recommendation of our NG&S Committee, each of the initial Class I directors was nominated to stand for re-election as a Class I director at the 2022 annual meeting and was re-elected to serve until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in the third year following the year of their election. The initial Class II directors serve for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting; and the initial Class III directors serve for a term expiring at the first annual meeting of stockholders following the Annual Meeting. Commencing with the Class I directors re-elected at our 2022 annual meeting, the successors of the class of directors whose term expires at each annual meeting shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year following the year of their election and until each respective director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or his or her earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal.

Effective on May 7, 2021, Bernie Wolford, Jr. was appointed as our President and CEO. On May 8, 2021, Mr. Wolford was appointed as a Class III member of our Board. In April 2022, our Board approved the addition of Benjamin C. Duster, IV to serve as a Class III director, effective on May 3, 2022. Our Board currently consists of the following directors:

Name

  Director
Class
  Position  Age as of
March 1,
2023
   Director
Since
 

John H. Hollowell

  I  Director   65    2021 

Patrick Carey Lowe

  I  Director   64    2021 

Adam C. Peakes

  I  Director   49    2021 

Neal P. Goldman

  II  Chairman of the Board   53    2021 

Ane Launy

  II  Director   36    2021 

Benjamin C. Duster, IV

  III  Director   62    2022 

Raj V. Iyer

  III  Director   51    2021 

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

  III  Director, President and CEO   63    2021 

Upon the recommendation of the NG&S Committee, the Board adopted, subject to stockholder approval at the Annual Meeting, amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board and institute annual elections of directors on a phased-in basis. See “Approval of Amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to Declassify our Board (Proposal No. 5).”

Director Nominees

Our Board currently consists of eight directors. On January 31, 2019, Charles L. Fabrikant informed usOne of his intention to resign from our Board effectivecurrent directors, Ane Launy, was not nominated for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Consequently,Following the recommendation of our NG&S Committee, the

11


Board has nominated Anatol Feygin as a candidatePatrice Douglas and Neal P. Goldman to stand for election to the Boardas Class II directors at the Annual Meeting, in addition to the seven remaining directors nominated forre-election at the Annual Meeting. All directors are elected annually to serve until the annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year following the year of their election or until each respective successors aredirector’s successor is duly elected and qualified at the next annual meeting of stockholders or until theirhis or her earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal. Our Board has determined that each of such nominees (and each other member of the Board other than Mr. Wolford) satisfies the independence requirements provided for under the rules of the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange (or NYSE). The namesbiographies of the nominees and information regarding our nominees,other continuing directors, including their business experience during the past five years and other background information and individual qualifications, attributes and skills, are described below. With

The Board recommends a vote FOR the exceptionelection of Mr. Feygin, each of the nominees is currently a director,Patrice Douglas and James S. Tisch and Andrew H. Tisch are brothers. Each of the eight directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting will serve a term of one year to expire at our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.Neal P. Goldman as Class II directors.

In the absence of contrary instructions, the proxies receivedwe receive from holders of our common stock will be voted at the Annual Meeting for the election of each of the belowBoard’s nominees. Although we do not contemplate that anyeither of the nominees will be unable to serve, decline to serve or otherwise be unavailable as a nominee at the time of the Annual Meeting, if that occurs we expect that the proxies will be voted for such other candidate(s) as our Board of Directors may nominate or our Board may adopt a resolution reducing the number of directors constituting our entire Board.

Class II Director Nominees for Election

Name

  

Position

  Age as of
January 31,
2019
   Director
Since
 

James S. Tisch

  Chairman of the Board   66    1989 

Marc Edwards

  Director, President and CEO   58    2014 

Anatol Feygin

  Director Nominee   50    —   

Paul G. Gaffney II

  Director   72    2004 

Edward Grebow

  Director   69    2008 

Kenneth I. Siegel

  Director   62    2014 

Clifford M. Sobel

  Director   69    2011 

Andrew H. Tisch

  Director   69    2011 

James S. TischPatrice Douglas, age 60, is an attorney representing energy companies, financial institutions, municipalities and utilities on legal, regulatory and compliance matters. From 2011 to 2015, Ms. Douglas served on the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (or the OCC), which regulates all oil and gas drilling, utilities and telephone companies in the state, including as Chairman of the OCC beginning in 2012. She served as Executive Vice-President of First Fidelity Bank from 2008 to 2011, and as Senior Vice-President and then President of SpiritBank from 2004 to 2008. Ms. Douglas also served as Mayor of Edmond, Oklahoma from 2009 through 2011. Ms. Douglas has served as a member of the board of directors, Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee of Amplify Energy Corp., a NYSE-listed independent oil and gas company, since February 2021, and as a member of the board of directors of Midstates Petroleum Company, Inc., an oil and gas company and predecessor to Amplify Energy, from 2016 through 2019, where she also served as Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and then Chair of the Audit Committee.

Ms. Douglas is a senior financial and legal executive with extensive experience in energy and a broad range of other industries. Her unique professional and leadership abilities, including as a director and audit committee member, will provide our Board with valuable strategic and analytical insight.

Neal P. Goldmanhas served as our Chairman of the Board since 1995. HeMay 2021 and is currently the Managing Member of SAGE Capital Investments, LLC, a consulting firm specializing in independent board of director services, restructuring, strategic planning and transformations for companies in multiple industries including energy, technology, media, retail, gaming and industrials. Mr. Goldman was a Managing Director at Och Ziff Capital Management, L.P. from 2014 to 2016 and a Founding Partner of Brigade Capital Management, LLC from 2007 to 2012, which he helped build to over $12 billion in assets under management. Mr. Goldman has served on the board of directors as our Chief Executive Officer (which we refer toChairman of the Board of Talos Energy Inc., a NYSE-listed oil and gas company, since 2018, and as CEO) from 1998 to 2008. Mr. Tisch isa director, Chair of the PresidentNominating and CEOGovernance Committee and a member of the OfficeAudit and Compensation and Human Resources Committees of the President of Loews, and has beenWeatherford International plc, a director of Loewspublicly-traded oilfield services company, since 1986. Mr. Tisch also serves as a director of General Electric Company and CNA Financial Corporation, a subsidiary of Loews.2019.

Mr. Tisch’sGoldman has over 25 years of experience in investing and working with companies in a variety of industries to maximize stockholder value. In addition to his current board of director service, Mr. Goldman has served on numerous other public and private company boards throughout his career, including Fairway Markets, Eddie Bauer, Toys R Us, J. Crew, Ultra Petroleum, Ditech Holding, Midstates Petroleum and

12


NII Holdings. Through his extensive background with our company provides him with unique knowledgeboard of director experience, Mr. Goldman has developed expertise overseeing public and insight into our businessprivate companies that have experienced complex corporate governance and operations, andfinancial situations, which enables him to more effectively provide us and our Board with strategic direction and operational oversight. In addition, Mr. Tisch’s status as the President

Class III Incumbent Directors

Benjamin C. Duster, IV, is Founder and CEO of Loews,Cormorant IV Corporation, LLC, a significant stockholderconsulting firm specializing in operational turnarounds and organizational transformations. Since June 2022, Mr. Duster has also served as Chief Financial Officer of ourMobile Technologies, Inc., an electronics and loss prevention company, enableswhere he is responsible for the Finance/Accounting, HR, IT and Administrative functions. Prior to founding Cormorant in 2014, Mr. Duster was a Senior Adviser at Watermark Advisors from 2006 to 2015, Partner at Masson & Company from 2001 to 2006, a Managing Director at Wells Fargo (Wachovia Securities) from 1997 to 2001 and a Vice President at Salomon Brothers Inc. from 1985 to 1997. Mr. Duster has served as a director, Chair of the Audit Committee and member of the Strategic Review Committee of Republic First Bancorp, Inc., a publicly-traded commercial bank, since July 2022, as a director, Chair of the Audit Committee and member of the Compensation Committee of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, a publicly-traded oil and gas producer, since February 2021, and as a director, Chair of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee and a member of the Audit and Nominating and Governance Committees of Weatherford International plc, a publicly-traded oilfield services company, since 2020.

Mr. Duster is an experienced professional with particular focus on operations, finance and strategic advisory and interim management, helping organizations assess and improve their execution effectiveness to ensure long-term sustainable value creation. His extensive experience on Wall Street, including in mergers and acquisitions and strategic advisory services in developed and emerging markets, provides our Board with valuable expertise and vision.

Raj V. Iyer is the CEO and a director of SpecifX, Inc., a company focusing on direct lithium extraction. Prior to have direct accessjoining SpecifX in October 2022, Mr. Iyer served as a Partner and Senior Portfolio Manager at Canyon Partners, a leading alternative investment manager with approximately $25 billion in assets under management, from 2006 to April 2021. Prior to joining Canyon, Mr. Iyer worked as a managing director at Colden Capital Management. Mr. Iyer began his career at Morgan Stanley, where he worked on structuring derivative transactions. Mr. Iyer is a Chartered Financial Analyst.

Mr. Iyer is a senior investment professional with over 20 years of investment experience in complex restructurings and distressed debt in a variety of companies in energy, retail, financial services and other cyclical sectors. He has been deeply involved in the perspectiverestructuring of the offshore services sector and has significant expertise in assessing balance sheet flexibility, optimizing cost of capital across financing sources and driving value-added returns for all stakeholders through governance and incentive alignment. This experience, combined with his financial and transactional expertise, enables Mr. Iyer to provide effective insight for our stockholders and ensures that the Board will take into consideration the interests of our stockholders in all Board decisions.Board.

Marc EdwardsBernie Wolford, Jr. has served as our President and CEO and as a director since March 2014.May 2021. Prior to joining our company, Mr. EdwardsWolford served as the CEO and a memberdirector of Halliburton Company’s Executive Committee andPacific Drilling S.A., a publicly-traded offshore drilling contractor, from November 2018 to April 2021. From 2010 to 2018, Mr. Wolford served in senior operational roles at Noble Corporation, another offshore drilling contractor, including five years as itsthe company’s Senior Vice President responsible for its Completion– Operations. He began his career with Transworld Drilling Company in 1981 and Production Division from 2010has worked in numerous locations across the globe. Mr. Wolford is also a significant stockholder of Mass Technology Corporation, an independent service provider to 2014. He served as Vice President for Production Enhancement of Halliburton Company from 2008 through 2009. Since January 2017, Mr. Edwards has also served as the Lead Director, Chairman of the Nominatingdownstream refining and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit and Risk and Compensation Committees of Keane Group, Inc., a NYSE-listed integrated well completion service company.storage sector.

Mr. EdwardsWolford developed an extensive background in the global energyoffshore drilling industry during his tenuretenures at HalliburtonPacific Drilling, Noble and Transworld that enables him to provide valuable contributions and perspective to our Board. His broad experience and understanding of the worldwide energy services industry provides valuable

13


insight to our Board’s strategic and other deliberations. In addition, Mr. Edwards’Wolford’s day-to-day leadership and involvement with our company as our President and CEO provides him with personal direct knowledge and insight regarding our operations.

Anatol FeyginClass I Incumbent Directors

John H. Hollowell retired from Royal Dutch Shell in 2018, where he most recently served as the President and CEO of Shell Midstream Partners, L.P., a NYSE-listed company that owns, operates, develops and acquires pipelines and other midstream and logistics assets. Mr. Hollowell held numerous positions of increasing responsibility during his 38-year career with Shell, including serving as the Executive Vice President – Deepwater, responsible for Shell’s upstream business in the Gulf of Mexico and Brazil, Vice President – Production for Shell E&P Europe, where he was accountable for Shell’s offshore assets in the United Kingdom, Holland and Norway, and Vice President – Distribution for Shell’s downstream business, responsible for Shell’s fuel storage and distribution business globally. Since 2018, Mr. Hollowell has served on the board of managers for Beacon Offshore Energy, a privately-held independent E&P operator focused on deepwater Gulf of Mexico.

Mr. Hollowell’s extensive background in the global oil and gas industry while at Shell enables him to provide valuable advice to our Board on industry issues and customer perspectives. His broad experience and understanding of the worldwide energy services industry, including offshore exploration, provides additional insight for our Board.

Patrick Carey Lowe retired as the Executive Vice President and Chief CommercialOperating Officer at Valaris plc, a NYSE-listed offshore drilling contractor, in December 2019. Mr. Lowe served as Ensco’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 2015 until 2019, when Ensco merged with Rowan and the combined company was renamed Valaris. Mr. Lowe held numerous executive positions at Ensco, including Executive Vice President for investor relations, strategy and human resources; Senior Vice President of Cheniere Energy,the eastern hemisphere; and Senior Vice President of engineering, capital projects and health, safety and the environment. Prior to joining Ensco, Mr. Lowe spent nearly 30 years in operational, engineering, human resources, and general management positions in the oil and gas industry, including general manager and hemisphere manager positions at Occidental Petroleum in Qatar and Latin America. Mr. Lowe began his career with Sedco, a U.S. drilling contractor that later became Sedco Forex under Schlumberger’s ownership. Since January 2020, Mr. Lowe has served on the board of directors and compensation committee of PHI Group, Inc., a NYSE-listed international energy company, since September 2016. Mr. Feygin joined Cheniere in March 2014 as Senior Vice President, Strategyprovider of helicopter services for the oil and Corporate Development. Prior to joining Cheniere, Mr. Feygin worked with Loews from November 2007 to March 2014, most recently as its Vice President, Energy Strategistgas and Senior Portfolio Manager. Prior to joining Loews, Mr. Feygin spent three years at Bank of America, most recently as Head of Global Commodity Strategy. Mr. Feygin began his banking career at J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. as Senior Analyst, Natural Gas Pipelines and Distributors.aeromedical industries.

Mr. Feygin’s experienceLowe’s 40-year career in the global energyoil and gas industry will enableand as a former offshore drilling executive enables him to advise our Board on industry issues and perspectives. As a result of his extensive experience in oil and gas executive, corporate development and financialoperational matters, Mr. Feygin will be able to provideLowe provides the Board with expertise in industry corporate leadership, financial management, corporate planning and strategic development.

Paul G. Gaffney II is a retired Navy Vice Admiral and President Emeritus of Monmouth University, having served as President from 2003 to 2013. He was President of the National Defense University from 2000 to 2003. Prior to assuming those duties, Mr. Gaffney was the chief of naval research with responsibility for the Department of the Navy’s science and technology investment and commanded the Navy’s Meteorology and Oceanography program. He was also the commanding officer of the Naval Research Laboratory. Mr. Gaffney was appointed to the U.S. Ocean Policy Commission in 2001, and served during its full tenure from 2001 to 2004. He chaired the federal Ocean Research/Resources Advisory Panel (ORRAP) and the federal Ocean Exploration Advisory Board and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering, a private nonprofit institution that advises the federal government and conducts independent studies to examine important topics in engineering and technology. He is also a fellow in the Urban Coast Institute at Monmouth University, a member of the National Academy’s Gulf Research Program Advisory Board, a Trustee of the Ocean Exploration Trust and also serves as the Counselor to the Dean of Engineering and Computing of the University of South Carolina.

Mr. Gaffney’s military experience, leadership in academia and expertise in ocean policy have provided him with valuable knowledge of the complex management and oversight issues faced by large institutions as well as policy and operational issues affecting the offshore drilling industry. As a result of this knowledge and experience, Mr. Gaffney provides our Board meaningful insights and a unique perspective to benefit the Board’s decision-making processes.

Edward Grebow is the Managing Director of Lakewood Advisors, LLC, a financial and business advisory firm. Prior to founding Lakewood Advisors, LLC in March 2018, Mr. Grebow had served as Managing Director of TriArtisan Capital Advisers, LLC, an investment and merchant bank, since 2013. He served as President and CEO of Amalgamated Bank, a commercial bank, from 2011 to 2013. Mr. Grebow also served as managing director of J.C. Flowers & Co. LLC, a private equity firm, from 2007 to 2011, and as President of ULLICO Inc., an insurance and financial services firm, from 2003 to 2006. Mr. Grebow alsoAdam C. Peakes has served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for the Hornblower Group, a directorprivately-held company in the global travel and Chairman ofexperiences industry, since April 2022. From 2019 through April 2022, Mr. Peakes was the Audit Committee of Alcentra CapitalExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Merichem Corporation, a NASDAQ-listedclosed-end managementprivately-held company focused on sulfur removal and spent caustic handling for companies in the midstream and downstream energy sectors. Prior to joining Merichem, Mr. Peakes served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Noble Corporation, a NYSE-listed offshore drilling contractor, from 2017 to 2019. From 2011 to 2016, Mr. Peakes was a Managing Director and Head of Oilfield Services at Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Company, an investment company since 2016 andbanking firm. Mr. Peakes served on the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of Trecora Resources, a NYSE-listed manufacturer of specialty petrochemical products and Audit Committeeprovider of Xenith Bankshares,custom processing services, from 2019 to June 2022, and on the board of directors of Petroserv Marine Inc., a NASDAQ-listed holding company for Xenith Bank, a full service commercial bank,an offshore drilling contractor with operations in Brazil, Indonesia and India, from 20162020 to 2018.March 2021.

14


Mr. Grebow is an experiencedPeakes’ background as a chief financial leader withofficer and his experience in the oilfield services financial sector provides him the necessary skills necessary to lead our Audit Committee. His broadextensive experience in financial leadership and services, commercialstrategic financial management and investment banking private equity and insurance

enables him to provide our Board with valued insight.valuable insight and expertise. This experience and knowledge also qualifiesqualify him to serve as the financial expert on our Audit Committee.

Kenneth I. Siegelhas served as a Senior Vice President of Loews since 2009. He has also served as a director of the general partner of Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, a subsidiary of Loews, since 2009 and as its Chairman of the Board since 2011. Mr. Siegel served as a senior investment banker at Barclay’s Capital from 2008 to 2009, and he served in a similar capacity at Lehman Brothers from 2000 to 2008.

Mr. Siegel has extensive experience with capital markets and merger and acquisition transactions as a result of his positions at Loews, Barclay’s Capital and Lehman Brothers. Mr. Siegel’s experience in his position at Loews also provides him with knowledge of the energy industry and broad knowledge of and insight into the operations of Loews and the businesses in which it is engaged, including our company. This experience, combined with his financial and transactional expertise, enables Mr. Siegel to provide effective insight for our Board.

Clifford M. Sobel served as U.S. Ambassador to The Netherlands from 2001 until 2005 and U.S. Ambassador to Brazil from 2006 until 2009. Mr. Sobel is presently Managing Partner of Valor Capital Group LLC, an investment group investing in Brazil. Previously he served as Chairman of Net2Phone, a NASDAQ-listed Internet provider, and on the Boards of Directors of Aegon Insurance, a NYSE-listed insurance company, and Alpinvest, a global private equity fund. Mr. Sobel has served on the Millennium Promise Board, anon-governmental organization supporting the UN Millennium Development Goals, and on the Advisory Boards to the American Military Commander of Europe and NATO, as well as the Command for American Forces for Central and South America.

Mr. Sobel’s experience in foreign service and diplomatic background in important markets for our offshore drilling services provide a unique perspective that adds significant value to our Board, particularly with respect to our international operations.

Andrew H. Tisch isCo-Chairman of the Board of Directors of Loews, as well as Chairman of the Executive Committee and a member of the Office of the President of Loews. Mr. Tisch served as a director of K12 Inc., a NYSE-listed technology-based education company, from 2001 until 2017 and served as its Chairman of the Board from 2007 until 2012. He is also a director of CNA Financial Corporation and a director of the general partner of Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, each a subsidiary of Loews. Mr. Tisch has been a director of Loews since 1985.

Mr. Tisch’s extensive executive leadership experience provides him with broad knowledge of and insight into the operations of Loews and the businesses in which it is engaged, including our company. This experience, coupled with Mr. Tisch’s institutional knowledge, is especially beneficial to our Board.

Director Independence

Because more than 50% of our outstanding common stock is held by Loews, we are a “controlled company” under the corporate governance listing standards (which we refer to as the NYSE Listing Standards) of the New York Stock Exchange (which we refer to as the NYSE). The NYSE Listing Standards do not require controlled companies to have a majority of independent directors. Currently, 50% of our Board of Directors is comprised of independent directors. In determining independence, each year our Board determines whether directors have any “material relationship” with our company or with any members of our senior management. On an annual basis, and more frequently as necessary, each director and each executive officer discloses any transactions with our company in which the director or executive officer, or any member of his or her immediate family, has a direct or indirect material interest. When assessing the materiality of a director’s relationship with us, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances known to it not merely from the director’s standpoint, but from that of the persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation,

and the frequency or regularity of the services provided by the director or such other persons or organizations to us or our affiliates by the director, any member of his or her immediate family, or any organizations with which the director has an affiliation, whether the services are being carried out at arm’s length in the ordinary course of business and whether the services are being provided substantially on the same terms to us as those prevailing at the time from unrelated parties for comparable transactions.

The Board has established guidelines to assist it in determining director independence. Under these guidelines, a director would not be considered independent if:

 

 (1)

any of the following relationships existed during the past three years:

 

 (i)

the director is our employee or the employee of any of our subsidiaries or has received more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from us, or any of our subsidiaries, other than director and committee fees and pension or certain other forms of deferred compensation for prior service;

 

 (ii)

the director provided significant advisory or consultancy services to us or any of our subsidiaries or is affiliated with a company or a firm that has provided significant advisory or consultancy services to us or any of our subsidiaries (annual revenue of the greater of 2% of the other company’s consolidated gross revenues or $1 million is considered significant)significant for this purpose);

 

 (iii)

the director has been a significant customer or supplier of ours or any of our subsidiaries or has been affiliated with a company or firm that is a significant customer or supplier of ours or any of our subsidiaries (annual revenue of the greater of 2% of the other company’s consolidated gross revenues or $1 million is considered significant)significant for this purpose);

 

 (iv)

the director has been employed by or affiliated with an internal or external auditor that within the past three years provided services to us or any of our subsidiaries;us; or

 

 (v)

the director has been employed by another company where any of our current executives serve on that company’s compensation committee;

 

 (2)

the director’s spouse, parent, sibling, child, mother- orfather-in-law,son- ordaughter-in-law or brother- orsister-in-law, or any other person sharing the director’s home (other than a domestic employee), has a relationship described in (1) above; or

 

 (3)

the director has any other relationships with us or any of our subsidiaries or with any member of our senior management that our Board of Directors determines to be material.

After considering all known relevant facts and circumstances and applying the independence guidelines described above, our Board has determined that Messrs. Fabrikant, Gaffney, Greboweach of our Class II director nominees and Sobel (whom we refer to as our Independent Directors)current directors other than Mr. Wolford are independent under the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards (or the NYSE Listing StandardsStandards) and our independence guidelines. guidelines described above. We refer to our current seven independent directors as our Independent Directors.

15


Board Committees

Our Board has also determined that Mr. Feygin,established the new nominee to the Board at the Annual Meeting, is independent under the NYSE Listing Standards and our independence guidelines. In making its determination with respect to Mr. Fabrikant, our Board also considered the commercial relationship between our company and SEACOR Holdings Inc. (of which Mr. Fabrikant is the Executive Chairman of the Board and CEO), SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (of which Mr. Fabrikant is theNon-Executive Chairman of the Board) and Era Group Inc. (of which Mr. Fabrikant is theNon-Executive Chairman of the Board), and determined that Mr. Fabrikant meets all of the requirements described above for Independent Directors and does not have a material relationship with us. Please read“Transactions with Related Persons—Transactions with Other Related Parties” below for more information concerning Mr. Fabrikant’s relationship with us.

Board Committees

Our Board of Directors has threefollowing standing committees: the Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and CompensationNG&S Committee. The current members of our threethese standing Board committees are identified below:

 

Director

  Executive
Audit
Committee
  Audit
Compensation
Committee
  Compensation
NG&S Committee

James S. TischNeal P. Goldman

  *

Marc Edwards

*

Charles L. Fabrikant

**

Paul G. Gaffney II

*Chair

Edward Grebow

  Chair  *

AndrewJohn H. TischHollowell

*Chair

Ane Launy

  *  *  

Patrick Carey Lowe

*

Adam C. Peakes

Chair

As a “controlled company” under the NYSE Listing Standards,From time to time, our Board also forms additional committees for specific purposes and limited durations. For example, in 2021, the Board appointed the Special Committee to explore strategic alternatives to maximize stockholder value. The Special Committee is not required to have a nominating committee. Our Board has determined that, because the full Board can perform the same functions that would normally be performed by a nominating committeecomprised of Adam C. Peakes (Chair), Neal P. Goldman, John H. Hollowell and because our Board includes independent directors, there would be no meaningful benefit to having a separate nominating committee. In lieu of a separate nominating committee, our entire Board performs the usual nominating committee functions, including participation in the consideration of director nominees.Patrick Carey Lowe.

Our Audit, Compensation and CompensationNG&S Committees operate under written charters that describe the functions and responsibilities of each committee. Each charter can be viewed on our website atwww.diamondoffshore.com in the “Investor Relations”“Investors” section under “Corporate Governance.” A copy of each charter can also be obtained by writing to us at Diamond Offshore, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 15415 Katy Freeway, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77094.

Please note that the The preceding Internet address and all other Internet addresses referenced in this proxy statement are for information purposes only and are not intended to be a hyperlink. Accordingly, no information found or provided at such Internet addresses or at our website in general (or at other websites linked to our website) is intended or deemed to be incorporated by reference in this proxy statement.

Executive Committee

Our Bylaws describe the functions and responsibilities of the Executive Committee of our Board of Directors. Our Executive Committee is authorized to exercise all of the powers of the Board in the management of our business that may lawfully be delegated to it by the Board.

Audit Committee

The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist our Board of Directors with its responsibility of overseeing the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of our independent auditor, the performance of our internal audit function and independent auditor and our systems of disclosure controls and procedures, internal control over financial reporting and compliance with our adopted ethical standards. Our internal audit controls function maintains critical oversight over the key areas of our business and financial processes and controls, and provides reports directly to the Audit Committee. The committee has sole authority to directly appoint, retain, compensate, evaluate and terminate the independent auditor and to approve all engagement fees and terms for the independent auditor. The members of the committee meet regularly with representatives of our independent auditor firm and with our manager of internal audit without the presence of management.

Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is an Independent Director and satisfies the additional independence and other requirements for Audit Committee members provided for inunder the NYSE Listing Standardsrules of the SEC and SEC rules.the NYSE. The Board has also determined that Mr. GrebowAdam C. Peakes qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.

The Board has designated that Ms. Douglas will serve as a member of the Audit Committee if she is elected as a Class II director at the Annual Meeting and has determined that she satisfies the independence and other requirements for Audit Committee members provided for under the rules of the SEC and the NYSE.

Compensation Committee

The primary function of the Compensation Committee is to assist our Board of Directors in discharging its responsibilities relating to compensation of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee determines

16


and approves compensation for our executive officers and directors and administers our Incentive Compensation Plan and our Equity Plan.employee incentive compensation plans. In accordance with its charter, the committee may form and delegate authority tosub-committees consisting of one or more of its members when appropriate. The committee does not delegate to management any of its functions in setting executive compensation under its charter. The committee has authority to retain or obtain advice of outside legal counsel, compensation consultants or other advisors to assist in the evaluation of director, CEO or executive officer compensation, including responsibility for the appointment, compensation and oversight of any such advisor retained by the committee. During 2018,In 2021 and 2022, the committee did not engageengaged Lyons, Benenson & Company Inc., a compensation advisorconsulting firm (which we refer to as LB&C), to review and provide advice to the committee regarding our executive and non-employee director compensation programs. During 2022, a representative of LB&C attended most Compensation Committee meetings. In connection with the firm’s engagement, the committee considered the independence of LB&C in light of SEC rules and the NYSE Listing Standards and concluded that the work of the firm would not raise any conflict of interest. Among the factors considered by the committee in determining the firm’s independence were the following:

Other services provided to our company by the firm;

The amount of fees to be paid by us as a percentage of the firm’s total revenues;

Policies or recommending amountsprocedures maintained by the firm designed to prevent a conflict of interest;

Business or forms ofpersonal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and any committee member;

Our common stock owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement; and

Business or personal relationships between our executive officers and the firm or director compensation.the individual consultants involved in the engagement.

The Compensation Committee completes a review of all elements of compensation at least annually. If it is determined that any changes to any executive officer’s total compensation are necessary or appropriate, the committee obtains input from management as it determines to be necessary or appropriate. All compensation decisions with respect to executive officers other than our CEO are determined in discussion with, and frequently based in part upon the recommendation of, our CEO. The committee makes all determinations with respect to the compensation of our CEO, including establishing performance objectives and criteria related to the payment of his compensation, and determining the extent to which such objectives have been achieved. SeeCompensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis for more information about the responsibilities of the Compensation Committee and the role of management with respect to compensation matters.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Paul G. Gaffney II, Charles L. FabrikantNeal P. Goldman, John H. Hollowell and Edward Grebow. In addition, Raymond S. Troubh was a member of the Compensation Committee in 2018 until his resignation from our Board of Directors as of our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.Ane Launy. Our Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is independent and satisfies the additional independence requirements for compensation committee members provided for inunder the NYSE Listing Standards andrules of the SEC rules.and NYSE. No member of the Compensation Committee is, or was during 2018,2022, an officer or employee of theour company. During 2018:2022:

 

None of our executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee;

 

None of our executive officers served as a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee; and

 

None of our executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Board of Directors.Board.

17


NG&S Committee

The NG&S Committee assists the Board with its responsibility for oversight of the director nominations process and our corporate governance, including determining and recommending to the Board the criteria for selecting director nominees; identifying, evaluating and recommending candidates and nominees for the Board, including consideration of any director candidates recommended by stockholders; and developing and recommending to the Board director independence standards, succession plans for the CEO and corporate governance policies and practices. The duties of the committee also include overseeing ESG matters and reviewing and making recommendations to the Board on our company’s policies and performance in relation to sustainability-related matters, including health and safety, process safety, the environment, climate change, human rights and workplace policies, security and emergency management, charitable and philanthropic activities, public advocacy and political donations, culture, inclusion and diversity. Our Board has determined that each member of the committee satisfies the definition of “independent” as established under the NYSE Listing Standards.

Board Diversity and Director Nominating Process

Our Board of Directors recognizes the benefits of diversity throughout our company and the merits of achieving diversity. In identifying, evaluating and nominating individuals to serve as our directors, including those identified by stockholders, our Board does not have formal diversity requirements or rules. Rather, the Board believes that our company is best served by directors with a wide range of perspectives, professional experience, skills and other individual qualities and attributes. Our Board considers diversity broadly to include diversity of race, ethnicity and gender, as well as diversity of viewpoint, professional experience and individual characteristics, qualities and skills, resulting in the inclusion of naturally varying perspectives among the

directors. Our Board also considers whether these capabilities and characteristics will enhance and complement the full Board so that, as a unit, the Board possesses the appropriate skills and experience to oversee the company’sour business, ensure consideration of a wide range of perspectives and serve the long-term interests of our stockholders.

More than 37% of the directors currently serving on our Board are either female or racially or ethnically diverse. Our Board nomineescurrent directors vary in age from 5036 to 72 and range in Board tenure from zero to 30 years.65. As described above under our director biographies, the current composition of our Board also reflects a variety of expertise, skills, experience and professional and personal backgrounds, including in the following areas:

 

Company history

Offshore oil and gas and oilfield servicesPublic company CEOs and boards

Strategy, leadership and core business skills

  Public company boardsInvestment and M&A

Finance and risk management

  Investment and M&ARestructuring

Global energy, business and business

technology
  Human capital management
Safety, environment and sustainabilityPublic policy and governmentcompany governance

Our Board of DirectorsNG&S Committee will, subject to the terms of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, review any candidates recommended by stockholders for positions on the Board. Our Bylaws provide that any stockholder entitled to vote generally in the election of directors at a meeting of stockholders who is a record owner at the time of giving notice and at the time of the meeting and who satisfies the other requirements and complies with the procedures specified in theour Bylaws may nominate persons for election to the Board, subject to any conditions, restrictions, limitations and limitationsother requirements imposed by our Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws. These procedures include a requirement that our Corporate Secretary receive timely written notice of the nomination, which, for the 2020our next annual meeting of stockholders, means that the nomination must be received no earlier than January 11, 2024, and not later than February 15, 2020.10, 2024, unless the date of the next annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after May 10, 2024. Any notice of nomination must be addressed to Diamond Offshore,

18


15415 Katy Freeway, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77094, Attention: Corporate Secretary, and must include, as to each Nominating Person (as defined in our Bylaws), in addition to any other information or matters required by our Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws:

 

theThe name and address of such Nominating Person and the stockholder submitting the nominationclass or series and number of the personour shares that are, directly or persons to be nominated;indirectly, owned of record or beneficially owned by such Nominating Person;

 

a representation that the stockholderAny Disclosable Interests (as defined in our Bylaws) including, among other things, any material pending or threatened legal proceeding in which such Nominating Person is a holderparty or material participant involving our company, any of our capital stock entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to appear in personofficers or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the persondirectors or persons specified in the notice;

a descriptionany of all contracts, arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and each nominee andour affiliates; any other personmaterial relationship between such Nominating Person, on the one hand, and us or persons (naming such personany of our affiliates, on the other hand; or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the stockholder;

suchany other information regarding each nominee proposed by the stockholder asrelating to such Nominating Person that would be required to be includeddisclosed in a proxy statement or information statement filedother filing required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies or consents by such Nominating Person in support of the business proposed to be brought before the meeting pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (or the Exchange Act);

As to each candidate whom a Nominating Person proposes to nominate for election as a director, all Nominee Information (as defined in our Bylaws) including, among other things, all information with respect to such candidate for nomination that would be required if such candidate for nomination were a Nominating Person and all information relating to such candidate for nomination that is required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors in a contested election pursuant to Section 14(a) under the Exchange Act, as well as a completed and the rulessigned questionnaire, representation and regulations under it;agreement as required by our Bylaws; and

 

theThe consent of each nominee to serve as our director if so elected.

Nominations of directors may also be made by our Board of Directors or as otherwise provided in our Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws. In determining whether it will nominate a candidate for a position on our Board, the Board considers those matters it deems relevant, which may include the candidate’s integrity; business specialization; career achievements; breadth of experience; soundness of judgment; ability to make independent analytical inquiries; independence and potential conflicts of interest; potential to meet the present needs of the Board in light of the current mix of director skills and attributes; ability to represent the total corporate interests of our company and our stockholders; and diversity of race, ethnicity and gender. While our Board believes that its current membership comprises a variety of perspectives, professional experience, skills and other qualities and attributes, the Board is committed to efforts to increase diversity and will continue to consider diversity of race, ethnicity and gender among other relevant factors when assessing individual candidates and nominees to fill Board vacancies that occur in the future.

Majority Vote Standard for Election of Directors

Our Bylaws require a mandatory majority voting, director resignation procedure. A nominee for director in an uncontested election (such as this one) will be elected to the Board if all votes cast for that nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against his or her election. In the event that an incumbent director nominee does not receive a majority of the votes cast, the Board will require that director to tender his or her resignation and will establish a committee to consider whether to accept or reject the resignation. The Board will act on the committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision.

Executive Sessions ofNon-Management Independent Directors

Ournon-management directors, our Independent Directors and each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and the CompensationNG&S Committee meet regularly in executive sessions without the presence of management. Upon the recommendation of thenon-management directors and Independent Directors, ourOur Board of Directors has selected Edward Grebow to act as the Lead Director andNeal P. Goldman to serve as the presiding director at meetings of ournon-management directors and our Independent Directors.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board’s leadership structure consists of aan independent Chairman of the Board (who is not our current CEO), a Lead Director and independent chairs of the Audit Committee, and Compensation Committee chairs. James S. Tisch, anon-employee director,and NG&S Committee. Neal P. Goldman currently serves as our Chairman of the Board. Our LeadAs an independent Chairman, Mr. Goldman also functions as the lead Independent Director is Edward Grebow, who is alsoby chairing separate meetings of the ChairmanIndependent Directors, facilitating the ability of the Independent Directors to fulfill their responsibilities and communicating any concerns of the Independent Directors to the full Board and to our Audit Committee.executive management. The Board believes this structure provides

19


independent Board leadership and engagement and strong oversight of management while providing the benefit of having ourthe Chairman lead regular Board meetings as we discuss key business and strategic issues. Mr. Edwards has served asissues and set the agenda for Board meetings. Although our CEO since March 2014. We separateBoard currently separates the roles of CEO and Chairman, our Board believes that either structure can be effective. Separating the roles of the Board in recognition ofCEO and Chairman recognizes the differences between the two roles. The CEO is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the companyroles and providing theday-to-day leadership of the company, while the Chairman provides guidance to the CEO and sets the agenda for Board meetings and presides over the meetings of the full Board. Separating these positions allows our CEO to focus on ourday-to-day business, while allowing our Chairman to guide the CEO and lead the Board in its fundamental role of providing advice to, and oversight of, management.

Although our Board currently separates Combining the roles of CEO and Chairman roles can be beneficial because CEOs are closely involved in the day-to-day operations of their companies and are well positioned to elevate critical business issues for consideration by their boards of directors, and combining these positions would allow the Board,CEO to effectively execute the company’s strategic initiatives and business plans and confront challenges facing the company. Our Board has no fixed policy with respect to combining or separating the positions. In our company’s history, there have been times that our CEO also served as Chairman. The Board has exercised discretion in combining or separating the positions as it has deemed appropriate in light of prevailing circumstances, and the Board may in the future reevaluate this determination.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

Our Board recognizes the importance of understanding, evaluating and managing risk and its impact on the financial health of our company. Our management periodically has discussions with our Board, Audit Committeecompany and Compensation Committee to, among other things, assist in identifying the principal risks facing our company, identifying and evaluating policies and practices that promote a culture designed to appropriately balance risk and reward, and evaluating risk management practices. These opportunities to interact enable thenon-management directors to conduct meaningful discussions concerning these issues with senior management during Board, Audit Committee and Compensation Committee meetings.

Our Board oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management, designed to support the achievement of organizational objectives, including strategic objectives, improve long-term organizational performance and enhance stockholder value. A fundamental component of risk management is not only understanding the risks and the measures management is taking to manage the risks, but also understanding

what level of risk is appropriate for the company. The involvement of the full Board in setting our business strategy is a key part of the Board’s assessment of the company’s tolerance for risk. The Board also regularly reviews information regarding the company’s credit, liquidity and operations, as well as the associated risks. While the Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, committeesprocess. The Board’s role in risk oversight is consistent with our leadership structure, with our CEO and other members of senior management having responsibility for assessing and managing our risk exposure, and the Board and its committees providing oversight in connection with those efforts. The Board exercises these responsibilities regularly as part of its meetings and also through the company’s management also share responsibility forBoard’s standing committees, each of which examines various components of enterprise risk management.as part of their responsibilities. In particular, the Audit Committee focuses on financial risk, including internal controls, and discusses risk assessment with management and our internal and external auditors. In addition, in setting compensation, the Compensation Committee endeavors to create incentives that encourage a level of risk-taking behavior consistent with the company’sour business strategies and long-term stockholder value. While each committeeThe NG&S Committee is specifically charged with overseeing ESG matters, including related risk management.

Our Board oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management, designed to support the achievement of organizational objectives, including strategic objectives, long-term organizational performance and enhanced stockholder value. The involvement of the full Board in setting our business strategy is a key part of the Board’s assessment of our tolerance for risk. The Board also regularly reviews information regarding our credit, liquidity and operations, as well as the associated risks, including cybersecurity risks. Throughout the year, the Board and the relevant Board committees receive updates from management with respect to various enterprise risk management issues and dedicate a portion of their meetings to reviewing and discussing specific risk topics in greater detail, including risks related to cybersecurity and COVID-19, to, among other things, assist in identifying the principal risks facing our company, identifying and evaluating policies and practices that promote a culture designed to appropriately balance risk and reward, and evaluating risk management practices.

Cybersecurity. Cybersecurity is a critical part of our risk management. To address cybersecurity threats more effectively, we leverage a multi-layered approach. We have a dedicated Chief Information Officer (or CIO) whose team is responsible for evaluating certainleading enterprise-wide information security strategy, policy, standards, architecture and processes. The Board and the Audit Committee receive regular updates from senior management, including the CIO, on matters such as major cyber risk areas, cybersecurity technologies and practices and cybersecurity incidents. We also periodically engage third parties to perform cybersecurity assessments to detect vulnerabilities, such as ransomware or data loss.

COVID-19. Since 2020, in addition to COVID-19 discussions as part of risk updates to the Board and the relevant Board committees, the Board has been provided with updates on COVID-19’s impact to our business, financial condition and operations through emails, teleconferences or other appropriate means of communication. We have COVID-19 risk protocols and responses embedded across our risk areas and will continue to evaluate our approach in addressing COVID-19-related risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board is regularly informed through committee and management reports about such risks.as circumstances evolve.

20


Director Attendance at Meetings

During 2018,2022, our Board of Directors heldmet six meetings,times, our Audit Committee held seven meetings andmet eight times, our Compensation Committee held three meetings. Our Executivemet eight times, our NG&S Committee did not meet during 2018.met four times and our Special Committee met 20 times. Overall, during 2018 the rate of attendance by our directors at Board and committee meetings during 2022 was 98%. In 2018, all but one of our directors99%, and in 2022 no director attended allless than 97% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which they served, and nothe director attended less than 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which he served. We do not require our Board members to attend our annual meeting of stockholders; however, allfive of our directors thenattended our 2022 annual meeting.

Director Compensation

Our Board has delegated to our Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, the primary responsibility for reviewing and considering revisions to our director compensation program. In setting director compensation, the committee considers the amount of time our directors expend in office were present at our annual meeting held in May 2018.

Director Compensation

Company employees who are alsofulfilling their duties as well as the skill level required of members of our BoardBoard. The committee’s goal is to compensate our non-employee directors in a way that is competitive and attracts and retains directors of Directors doa high caliber. Mr. Wolford, our President and CEO, does not receive any cash or equity fee or other remuneration for his service as a director.

Upon our emergence from chapter 11 reorganization in April 2021, the Compensation Committee engaged LB&C to provide recommendations for our non-employee director compensation program. LB&C reviewed non-employee director compensation practices and trends and data from comparable oilfield services as directors. In addition, employees of Loews who are alsocompanies and recommended the following compensation program for our non-employee directors, do not receive any cash fee for services as members ofwhich the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board. We currently have fournon-employee directors who qualify for cash compensation as directors. In addition to reimbursing all reasonableout-of-pocket expenses that each director incurs attending Board meetings, we currently pay each of our eligiblenon-employee directors aand the Board approved, effective on April 23, 2021 (all cash retainer of $50,000 per year,amounts to be paid in quarterly installments. In addition,installments in advance):

Annual cash retainer for our Chairman of the Board of $150,000;

Annual cash retainer for directors (other than our Chairman of the Board) of $100,000;

Annual cash retainer for the Chair of the Audit Committee receives an annualof $20,000;

Annual cash retainer of $15,000,for the ChairmanChair of the Compensation Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $10,000$15,000;

Annual cash retainer for the members of the NG&S Committee and the non-Chair members of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee of $10,000; and

On April 23, 2021, non-employee directors received a grant of RSUs for 2021 and 2022 with an annual grant date value of $120,000, for a total combined annual grant date value of $240,000. Mr. Duster, who joined the Board on May 3, 2022, received a grant of RSUs on May 3, 2022 with a prorated grant date value of $79,560. The RSUs granted on April 23, 2021 vested 30% on April 23, 2022 and the remaining 70% will vest on April 23, 2023, subject to the director’s continuous service or employment with our company through the applicable vesting date. Mr. Duster’s RSUs granted on May 3, 2022 will vest 30% on May 3, 2023 and 70% on May 3, 2024, subject to Mr. Duster’s continuous service with our company through the applicable vesting date. If a director resigns at our request or we fail to nominate the director for election as a director on the Board, then 100% of the RSUs shall immediately vest on the date of such termination. Upon a change in control of our company, 100% of the RSUs shall vest, subject to the director’s continuous service through consummation of the change in control. We will issue and deliver to the director the number of shares equal to the number of vested RSUs following the earliest to occur of (x) the fifth anniversary of the grant date, (y) a separation from service, and (z) a change in control. The director may elect, with respect to up to 40% of the vested and non-forfeitable RSUs, to receive cash equal to the fair market value of the shares underlying the RSUs instead of shares.

21


In addition, in August 2021, the company announced that the Board had established a special committee to explore strategic alternatives to maximize stockholder value. During 2022, the chair of the special committee was paid a monthly fee of $20,000, and the Lead Director receives an annual cash retainerother members of $10,000. We also paythe committee were each of our qualifiednon-employee directorspaid a cashmonthly fee of $1,500 for each Board meeting attended$15,000.

In November 2022, based on advice and $1,000 for each meeting ofrecommendations from LB&C, the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee attended.

During 2018,reevaluated the Board’s compensation program and approved grants of RSUs to non-employee directors for 2023 on January 18, 2023 with the exceptiona grant date value of James S. Tisch, each member of$120,000 (except our Board of Directors who is not also employed by our company received an award of 1,000 SARs each quarter. In recognition of his additional duties asnon-executive Chairman of the Board Mr. Tisch received an awarda grant with a grant date value of 7,500 SARs for$180,000). The 2023 RSUs will vest on the first quarteranniversary of 2018. Commencingthe grant date, subject to the director’s continuous service with our company through the quarterly grantvesting date. If a director resigns at our request for reasons other than cause, then 100% of the RSUs will immediately vest on April 1, 2018,the date of such termination. Upon a change in control of our company, 100% of the RSUs will vest, subject to the director’s continuous service through consummation of the change in control. We will issue and deliver to the director the number of SARs received by Mr. Tisch decreasedshares equal to 1,000 SARs per quarter, consistent with all othernon-employee directors. The SARs awardedthe number of vested RSUs following the earliest tonon-employee directors during 2018 vested immediately upon occur of (x) the fifth anniversary of the grant date, (y) a separation from service, and have(z) a term of 10 years from the date of grant.change in control.

22


Director Compensation for 20182022

The following table summarizes the compensation earned by ournon-employee directors in 2018:2022:

 

Name(1)

  Fees Earned or
Paid in

Cash ($)
   Option Awards
($)(2)
   All Other
Compensation ($)
   Total ($) 

James S. Tisch

   —      75,008    —      75,008 

John R. Bolton

   17,099    12,723    —      29,822 

Charles L. Fabrikant

   66,000    29,153    —      95,153 

Paul G. Gaffney II

   75,000    29,153    —      104,153 

Edward Grebow

   95,000    29,153    —      124,153 

Herbert C. Hofmann

   29,500    12,723    —      42,223 

Kenneth I. Siegel

   —      29,153    —      29,153 

Clifford M. Sobel

   57,500    29,153    —      86,653 

Andrew H. Tisch

   —      29,153    —      29,153 

Raymond S. Troubh

   35,500    12,723    —      48,223 

Name(1)

  Fees Earned or
Paid in
Cash ($)
   RSU Awards
($)(2)
   All Other
Compensation ($)
   Total ($) 

John H. Hollowell

   300,000    —      —      300,000 

Patrick Carey Lowe

   290,000    —      —      290,000 

Adam C. Peakes

   360,000    —      —      360,000 

Neal P. Goldman

   365,000    —      —      365,000 

Ane Launy

   120,000    —      —      120,000 

Benjamin C. Duster, IV

   65,935    79,560    —      145,495 

Raj V. Iyer

   100,000    —      —      100,000 

 

(1)

Mr. Bolton resigned from ourDuster was elected to the Board effective April 8, 2018 as a result of his appointment as U.S. national security advisor. Messrs. Hofmann and Troubh served as directors until our 2018 annual meeting held inon May 2018. Marc Edwards,3, 2022. Bernie Wolford, Jr., our President and CEO, is not included in this table because he was an employee of our company during 2018,2022, and therefore received no compensation for his servicesservice as director. The compensation received by Mr. EdwardsWolford as an employee of theour company during 20182022 is shown in the20182022 Summary Compensation Table below.

(2)

These amounts representThis amount represents the aggregate grant date fair value of awardsthe award of SARsRSUs granted to Mr. Duster pursuant to our Equity2021 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (or our Stock Plan) for the year ended December 31, 2018,2022, computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (which we refer to as FASB ASC Topic 718). Assumptions used in the calculation of the dollar amountsamount of these awardsthis award are included in Note 5,7, Stock-Based Compensation, to our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182022 included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, which has been filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019.SEC.

As of December 31, 2018, our2022, these non-employee directors held the following outstanding, unvested company equity awards:

 

Name

  Unexercised
Option Awards (#)RSU
Awards(#)
 

James S. TischJohn H. Hollowell

   280,50036,364 

Charles L. FabrikantPatrick Carey Lowe

   34,00036,364 

Paul G. Gaffney IIAdam C. Peakes

   34,00036,364 

Edward GrebowNeal P. Goldman

   34,50054,546 

Kenneth I. SiegelAne Launy

   19,00036,364 

Clifford M. SobelBenjamin C. Duster, IV

   28,50010,135 

Andrew H. TischRaj V. Iyer

   29,00036,364 

Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines

We have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Our code can be found on our website atwww.diamondoffshore.com in the “Investor Relations”“Investors” section under“Corporate “Corporate Governance” and is available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy by writing to our Corporate Secretary. We intend to post any changes to or waivers of our code for our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer on our website.

In addition, our Board of Directors has adopted written Corporate Governance Guidelines to assist our directors in fulfilling their responsibilities. The guidelines can be foundare on our website atwww.diamondoffshore.com in the “Investor Relations”“Investors” section under “Corporate Governance” and isare available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy from our Corporate Secretary.

23


Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Focus

We are committed to conducting our business in a safe, environmentally responsible and sustainable manner, and in a way that reflects our responsibilities to our stakeholders, which includes our employees, customers, investors, business partners, regulators and citizens in the communities where we live and work. We also believe that the effective management of ESG issues will help support the sustainability and the long-term growth of our business, and create value for our stakeholders. Our NG&S Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board on our policies and performance in relation to sustainability-related matters, including health and safety, process safety, the environment, climate change, human rights and workplace policies, security and emergency management, charitable and philanthropic activities, public advocacy and political donations, and culture, inclusion and diversity.

In 2021, under the oversight of our NG&S Committee, we began to develop our ESG strategy and establish a framework for monitoring our ESG initiatives. In January 2022, we published our 2021 Sustainability Report, which is posted on our website at www.diamondoffshore.com in the “Investors” section under “Corporate Governance.” The report describes our initial efforts and initiatives regarding sustainability, governance, the environment and our employees. We recognize we are in the early stages of our ESG journey, but also that our commitment can serve as the foundation for our global culture and help strengthen the ties between our success and the well-being of our employees, customers, stockholders, communities and other stakeholders. To further our goals, we have prioritized our work into the following key ESG objectives:

Health, Safety and Environment (or HSE)

Economic Performance

Employees

Compliance with Laws and Regulations

Corporate Governance

We understand the importance of being responsible stewards of our planet’s resources and the value in protecting it for our customers, communities and employees. We are in the beginning stages of developing our climate strategy but we have already made progress and have installed equipment on certain of our rigs to measure emissions, which has enabled us to identify methods for operating our rigs in a more fuel-efficient manner and thereby reduce greenhouse gas emissions and our carbon footprint.

We are committed to being a good corporate citizen as well as creating a positive employee environment. Our commitment to health and safety and the environment guides every aspect of our business. We pride ourselves on being an innovative leader in developing and implementing sophisticated and efficient job safety programs. We also believe that attracting, retaining and developing members of our workforce is critical to the sustainability of our business.

We invest in our people by recognizing the value of a diverse and inclusive workforce, offering numerous development and training opportunities, engaging employee programs, and providing generous benefit and wellness offerings. Creating and maintaining an environment where differences are valued and respected enhances our ability to recruit and retain the best talent in the marketplace and to provide a work environment that allows all employees to be their best.

We believe a healthy workforce leads to greater well-being at work and at home, and we offer benefits and resources to promote mental health and emotional wellness. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, our management team has strived to promote the health and safety of our global employees. Throughout the pandemic, we have closely monitored the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines to implement safety protocols for our employees in accordance with the latest guidance and provided services and resources to assist employees with a variety of medical and business needs.

24


Conducting business the right way — with integrity, holding ourselves to high ethical standards and acting in compliance with applicable laws and regulations — is one of our core principles and a foundation for our operations. We emphasize a culture of accountability and conduct our business in a manner that is fair, ethical and responsible to earn the trust of our stakeholders, including customers, employees, communities, partners and regulators. We have adopted a culture of ethics, and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires that our directors and employees make business decisions guided by compliance with applicable laws, rules and expectations for ethical conduct.

Loans to Directors and Executive Officers

We comply and operate in a manner consistent with regulations prohibiting loans to our directors and executive officers.

Prohibitions Against Hedging and Pledging

We have a policy that prohibits our directors and employees (including our executive officers) from engaging in any hedging or short sale transactions related to our stock or other equity securities, thereby preventing our directors, executives and other employees from insulating themselves from the effects of poor stock performance. We also have a policy that prohibits our directors and employees (including our executive officers) from pledging our stock or other securities as collateral for a loan.

Reporting of Ethics and Compliance Concerns

We have a dedicated hotline and website available to all employees to report ethics and compliance concerns, anonymously if preferred, including concerns related to accounting, accounting controls, financial reporting and auditing matters. The hotline and website are administered and monitored by an independent monitoring company. A description of our procedures for confidential anonymous complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters can be found on our website atwww.diamondoffshore.com in the “Investor Relations”“Investors” section under “Corporate Governance—Confidential Reporting” and is available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy from our Corporate Secretary.

Public Policy Engagement and Political Activities

In recent years, we have not engaged in public policy or political activities, and as a policy we generally do not make corporate political contributions. We may on occasion contribute to elections and to state and local initiative or referendum campaigns where our interests are directly involved and where permitted by applicable law. Our company and some of our employees participate in industry and business trade groups that may engage in their own lobbying or other advocacy activities. In addition, we encourage our employees to exercise their voting rights and to take an active interest in the Federal, state and local elective processes.

Transactions with Related Persons

We have a written policy requiring that any transaction, regardless of the size or amount, involving us or any of our subsidiaries in which any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers, principal stockholders or any of their immediate family members has had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, be reviewed and approved or ratified by our Audit Committee. All such transactions are tomust be submitted to our General Counsel for review and reported to our Audit Committee for its consideration. In each case, the Audit Committee will consider, in light of all of the facts and circumstances known to it that it deems relevant, whether the transaction is fair and reasonable to our company.

TransactionsPursuant to our Joint Plan, on April 23, 2021, we entered into a registration rights agreement with Loews. Prior tocertain parties (or the initial public offeringRRA Stockholders) that became beneficial owners of 5% or more of our common stock in 1995,upon our

25


emergence from bankruptcy. The RRA Stockholders exercised their right to require us to file a shelf registration statement and we werefiled a wholly-owned subsidiary of Loews. In connection with the initial public offering,registration statement on Form S-1, which we entered into agreements with Loews pursuant to which Loews agreed to provide certain management, administrative and other services to us and certain other obligations were assumed by the parties. These agreements, which are described below, were not the result of arm’s length negotiations between the parties.

Services Agreement. We are partylater converted to a services agreement with Loews pursuantregistration statement on Form S-3, to which Loews performs certain administrative and technical services on our behalf. Such services include personnel, internal audit, accounting and cash management services, in addition to advice and assistance with respect to preparation of tax returns and obtaining insurance. Under the services agreement, we are required to reimburse Loews for (i) allocated personnel costs (such as salaries, employee benefits and payroll taxes) of the Loews personnel providing such services and (ii) allout-of-pocket expenses related to the provision of such services on our behalf. The services agreement may be terminated by us with 30 days’ notice to Loews and may be terminated by Loews with six months’ notice to us. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify Loews for all claims and damages arising from the provision of services by Loews under the services agreement unless due to the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Loews. During 2018, we were charged approximately $600,000 by Loews for these support functions.

Registration Rights Agreement. Under a Registration Rights Agreement dated October 16, 1995, between us and Loews, we agreed to file, upon the request of Loews and subject to certain limitations, one or more registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, subject to a maximum of two remaining requests, in order to permit Loews to offer and sell any of our common stock that Loews may hold. Under the agreement, Loews will bear the costs of any such registered offering, including any underwriting commissions relating to shares it sells in any such offering, any related transfer taxes and the costs of complying withnon-U.S. securities laws, and any fees and expenses of separate counsel and accountants retained by Loews. Subject to certain conditions, we have also granted Loews the right to include itsregister 20,229,065 shares of our common stock inowned by the RRA Stockholders. The registration statement became effective on June 17, 2022. We will not receive any registration statements covering offeringsproceeds from the sale of our common stock by us,these shares and we will paybear all costsexpenses associated with the registration of such offerings other than underwriting commissionsshares. The registration rights granted in the agreement are subject to customary indemnification and transfer taxes attributable to the shares sold on behalf of Loews.

contribution provisions, as well as customary restrictions such as blackout periods.

Transactions with Other Related Parties. From time to time, we hire marine vessels and helicopter transportation services at prevailing market rates from subsidiaries of SEACOR Holdings Inc. and from SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. and Era Group Inc. Mr. Fabrikant, who isOn July 26, 2021, Avenue Energy Opportunities Fund II AIV, L.P. (or Avenue), a member of our Board of Directors, is the Executive Chairman of the Board and CEO of SEACOR Holdings Inc. and theNon-Executive Chairman of the Board of each of SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. and Era Group Inc. and is the beneficialthen-beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock, and Avenue’s investment manager, Avenue Capital Management II, L.P. (which we refer to collectively with Avenue as Avenue Capital), filed a classcomplaint against us to compel an annual meeting of outstanding voting securitiesstockholders pursuant to 8 Del. C. Section 211(c) before the Court of each company. During 2018,Chancery of the State of Delaware. On August 31, 2021, we collectively paid approximately $400,000and Avenue Capital agreed to settle the complaint. Under the terms of the settlement, Avenue Capital agreed to dismiss the complaint with prejudice and release all claims with respect to the alleged failure by us or our directors and officers to hold our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, and we agreed to hold our next annual meeting of stockholders no later than January 21, 2022. At the request of the parties, on September 1, 2021, the Court of Chancery ordered the action dismissed with prejudice.

We scheduled our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders to be held on January 21, 2022. On November 18, 2021, Avenue Capital delivered to the company a purported notice of nominations with respect to the election of Class I directors at the annual meeting. We notified Avenue Capital that the notice was invalid because the notice and Avenue did not comply with the requirements set forth in our Bylaws, and therefore the notice could not be accepted. On November 30, 2021, Avenue Capital filed a request with the Delaware court, seeking an order compelling us to accept their notice.

On December 29, 2021, we and Avenue Capital entered into an agreement providing for the hiresettlement of such vesselsthe above disputes. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Avenue Capital withdrew their nominations notice and such services. On January 31, 2019, Mr. Fabrikant informedDelaware court action. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Avenue Capital agreed to customary standstill restrictions during the period from December 29, 2021 until the earlier of (x) the date 30 days prior to the deadline for the submission of stockholder nominations of director candidates for our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders and (y) any public announcement by us of his intentionan extraordinary transaction. During the above standstill period, Avenue Capital agreed to resign fromcause its common stock in our company to be present for quorum purposes at any meeting of our stockholders at which directors are elected and to vote in favor of the slate of directors nominated by our Board effective atfor election. In addition, we agreed that in the Annual Meeting.event a vacancy on our Board arises as a result of certain events occurring prior to the one-year anniversary of the settlement agreement, we will appoint one director designated by Avenue Capital to fill such vacancy.

26


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

As discussed above under the headingBoard Committees—AuditCommittees-Audit Committee, a primary role of the Board’s Audit Committee is to oversee the company’s financial reporting process and manage its relationship with the independent auditor. In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20182022 with the company’s management and independent auditor. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the company’s independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301,Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted and amended bythe applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.Board and the SEC. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditor its independence in relation to the company and its management, including the matters in the written disclosures provided to the Audit Committee as required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has determined that the provision ofnon-audit services provided by the auditor is compatible with maintaining the auditor’s independence.

The members of the Audit Committee rely without independent verification on the information provided to them by management and the independent auditor and on management’s representation that the company’s financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity. The Audit Committee does not provide any expert or special assurance as to the company’s financial statements or any professional certification as to the independent auditor’s work. Accordingly, the Audit Committee’s oversight does not provide an independent basis to determine that management has applied appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or internal controls and procedures, that the audit of the company’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, that the company’s financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or that the company’s auditor is in fact “independent.”

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2022, which has been filed with the SEC.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Adam C. Peakes, Chair

Neal P. Goldman

Ane Launy

27

Edward Grebow, Chairman

Charles L. Fabrikant

Paul G. Gaffney II


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introductory note: The following discussion of executive compensation contains descriptions of various employee benefit plans and employment-related agreements. These descriptions are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text or detailed descriptions of the plans and agreements, which are filed or incorporated by reference as exhibits to our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2022 or a Current Report on Form 8-K subsequently filed with the SEC.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation program for 2018. In particular, it2022 and explains how our Compensation Committee made its compensation decisions for 20182022 for our executive officers identified in the following table, consisting of our CEO, Chief Financial Officer (which we refer to as CFO)our CFO and threeour other most highly compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2018.2022. We refer to the below group of executive officers collectively as our “named executive officers.officers” or “NEOs.

 

Name

  

Title

Marc EdwardsBernie Wolford, Jr.

  

President and CEO (our principal(principal executive officer)

Ronald WollDominic A. Savarino

  Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer

Scott L. Kornblau

Senior Vice President and CFO (our principal(principal financial officer)

David L. Roland

  

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Thomas M. Roth

Senior Vice President—Worldwide Operations

Executive Summary

With one exception described below, the objectives and major components ofWe successfully emerged from our executivechapter 11 reorganization in April 2021, so 2022 was our first full calendar year after our emergence. As a result, our incentive compensation program did not materially change from 2017programs in 2022 returned to 2018. While we regularly review and refine our compensation program, we believe consistency in our compensation program and philosophy is important to effectively motivate and rewardtop-level management performance and for the creation of stockholder value. We continue to provide our named executive officers with total annual compensation that includes three principal elements: base salary,being primarily performance-based, annual incentive cash compensation and long-term equity-based incentive awards. In addition, in 2018 we awarded long-term cash incentive awards to our named executive officers. Major elements of our compensation program continue to be performance-based, and a significant portion of each executive’s total annual compensation is at risk and dependent upon our company’s achievement of specific, measurable performance goals. Our performance-based pay is designedBoard approved a 2022 short-term incentive program (which we refer to alignas our executive officers’ interests with those2022 Incentive Plan) that covered certain of our stockholdersexecutives, including our NEOs. The 2022 Incentive Plan provided the executives the opportunity to earn cash compensation defined as a percentage of their base salaries that was at-risk and was contingent on achievement of certain specified performance metrics, in addition to promoteapplicable award caps. Performance under the creation2022 Incentive Plan was measured from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. After completion of stockholder value, without encouraging excessive risk-taking.the 2022 Incentive Plan performance period, our Compensation Committee determined that we achieved below target performance under the plan. As a result, payments under the 2022 Incentive Plan were paid below target. Details of the 2022 Incentive Plan results and payments are included below.

In July 2021, we granted performance-based RSU awards to certain of our key employees, including Messrs. Roland and Savarino, that vest based on the achievement of performance goals over three consecutive one-year performance periods. Upon the grant of the awards in July 2021, the Compensation Committee established the performance metrics and goals applicable to the first year performance period from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 and provided that the metrics and goals for the two remaining subsequent one-year performance periods would be established each year by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the applicable performance period. After the completion of the first year performance period in 2022, the Compensation Committee determined that the Company had achieved 88% of the first year performance goals and therefore 88% of the 2021 performance-based RSU awards held by Messrs. Roland and Savarino applicable to the first year performance period were vested.

In addition, in 2022 the Compensation Committee established the performance metrics and threshold, target and stretch performance goals applicable for the second year performance period, which is effective from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, for the 2021 performance-based RSU awards originally granted to Messrs. Roland and Savarino. The performance goals for the second-year performance period consist of (i) a specified level of achievement of five health, safety and environmental objectives, (ii) a specified level of

28


achievement of adjusted EBITDA, (iii) a specified amount of added cumulative contract backlog, (iv) a specified level of achievement of four ESG objectives and (v) achievement of strategic initiative goals determined by the Compensation Committee.

As approved by our Compensation Committee, on May 12, 2022, we granted additional equity incentive awards to certain of our key employees, including our CEO and other NEOs, consisting of time-based RSU awards that vest in equal amounts annually over a three-year period and performance-based RSU awards that vest based on the achievement of a target stock appreciation performance goal over a three-year period as determined by the Compensation Committee.

At our annual meeting of stockholders held in May 2018,January 2022, our stockholders approved all of our director nominees and proposals, including 92% approval of anon-binding advisory(say-on-pay) vote to approve the compensation of our executive officers. In thesay-on-pay vote, over 85% of the votes cast on the proposal voted in favor of our compensation practices and policies. After our 20182022 annual meeting, our Compensation Committee considered thesethe results of thesay-on-pay vote in its review of our compensation policies. Our general goal sincepolicies and has continuously re-evaluated and, as necessary, revised our 2018 annual meeting has beencompensation programs to continue to act consistently withmake the established practices that were overwhelmingly approved by our stockholdersprograms more effective and to take appropriate actions to further link payresponsive in achieving their intended reward, retention and performance when advisable.incentive goals. We believe that we have accomplished those goals during 2018.2022.

With the exception of increases related to promotions, base salaries for our named executive officers did not increase in 2018,Compensation Philosophy and we do not plan to increase base salaries for our named executive officers for 2019. Since 2015, depressed market conditions in the oil and gas industry have caused us to undertake numerous cost-cutting measures, including substantialreductions-in-force as well as general freezes on salary increases and new hiring.

In recognition of the critical need to retain key company leaders who are instrumental to achieving our business and strategic plans, particularly in depressed market conditions, in January 2017 our Board adopted an

executive retention plan (which we refer to as the 2017 Retention Plan) upon the recommendation of our Compensation Committee and made retention awards under the 2017 Retention Plan to Messrs. Edwards and Woll. The 2017 Retention Plan provided for us to pay each participating executive a cash retention payment if the executive remained actively employed through January 1, 2018 and another payment if the executive remains actively employed through January 1, 2019. To qualify for a payment, the executive was required to also remain actively employed by us through the payment date, not be on a leave (other than a legally protected leave), not be subject to any performance improvement plan and have complied with all company agreements and policies. The retention payments were paid to Messrs. Edwards and Woll in February 2018 and 2019. As a result of the continuation of the depressed market conditions, in June 2018 we entered into an extended retention arrangement with Mr. Woll to cover 2019 under the same terms as the 2017 Retention Plan. As a result of the 2019 extension, Mr. Woll will be paid $750,000 during the first quarter of 2020 if he remains actively employed through January 1, 2020 and meets the other conditions for the payment.

Payments under our annual cash incentive awards for 2018 reflected our company’s performance and level of achievement of our 2018 plan performance goals. As discussed further in this proxy statement under the heading“Annual Cash Incentive Awards,” our 2018 adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (which we refer to as EBITDA) exceeded the target adjusted EBITDA established at the beginning of 2018 for our 2018 annual cash incentive awards, despite the negative impact on our business from the steep decline in oil prices, the continued dramatic reduction in capital spending by our oil and gas customers and the oversupply of offshore drilling rigs in the market. As a result, annual cash incentive awards paid to our named executive officers for 2018 were generally comparable to 2017 and other recent years where we exceeded the applicable incentive plan target performance criteria.

When our previous CFO resigned, Scott L. Kornblau, our then-Vice President and Treasurer, was appointed as our acting CFO. In recognition of his increased duties and responsibilities as acting CFO, Mr. Kornblau received supplemental payments of $17,000 for each month that he served in such interim capacity. Mr. Kornblau was appointed Senior Vice President and CFO on July 1, 2018.

On April 1, 2018, each of our named executive officers received an award of restricted stock units, or RSUs, and long-term cash incentive awards. The RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards granted to our CEO in 2018 vest solely upon the level of attainment against a designated three-year financial performance goal. Most of the RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards granted to our other named executive officers in 2018 vest upon the level of attainment of the same three-year financial performance goal, and the remainder of the RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards granted to our other named executive officers time-vest (half two years after the grant date and half three years after the grant date). The RSU and long-term cash incentive award agreements for all named executive officers obligate the officer to comply with certain restrictive covenants, including obligations of confidentiality,non-solicitation and noncompetition.

Compensation Program Objectives

Through our executive compensation program, we seek to achieve the following general goals:

 

Attract and retain highly qualified and productive executives by striving to provide total compensation generally comparable toconsistent with compensation paid by other companies in the energy industry (although we dodid not benchmark our compensation for 2022 to any particular group of companies);

 

Motivate our executives to achieve strong financial and operational performance for our stockholders;stakeholders;

 

Structure compensation to create meaningful links between corporatecompany and individual performance and financial rewards;

Align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders by providing a significant portion of total compensation in the form of stock-based incentives;

Encourage long-term commitment to our company; and

 

Limit corporate perquisites.

We do not rely on formula-driven plans when determining the aggregate amount of compensation for each named executive officer.NEO. The primary factor in settingCompensation Committee takes many factors into account when making compensation isdecisions with respect to our evaluation ofexecutives, including the individual’s performance inand experience; the contextability of the individual to affect our long-term growth and success; the company’s overall performance; internal equity among the executives; and external, publicly available market data on competitive compensation practices and levels. The committee typically establishes the annual compensation program during the first quarter of each fiscal year, setting specific annual and long-term company goals and designing the compensation program for that year to support and reward the achievement of those goals. In setting the compensation for our NEOs other than the CEO, the committee considers, among other things, the recommendations of our company’s performanceCEO. Our CEO’s recommendations are reviewed with and ourare acted upon by the committee in accordance with its charter. At least once a year, the committee reviews the compensation objectives, policies and practices. Our Compensation Committee considers individual performance factors, including the committee’s view of the individual’s performance, the responsibilities of the individual’s position and the individual’s contribution to our company and to our financial and operational performance for the most recently-completed fiscal year.

Role of Management in Establishing and Awarding Compensation. On an annual basis, Mr. Edwards, with the assistance of our Human Resources department, recommendsCEO and considers any necessary adjustments to his compensation level. The Committee is solely responsible for making all decisions on the Compensation Committee any proposed annual or long-term cash incentive awards, equity awardscompensation of our executives, and increases in base salary for ourno executive officers other than him. No executive officer is involved in determining any element of his or her own compensation. Mr. Edwards’ recommendations are reviewed with and are acted upon by the Compensation Committee in accordance with its charter. At least once a year, the Compensation Committee reviews the compensation of Mr. Edwards and, following discussions with the Chairman of the Board, considers any necessary adjustments to his compensation level. Mr. Edwards’ annual base salary has not increased since his hire in March 2014.

Internal Pay Equity. We strive to pay our executive officers levels of compensation that reflect their individual responsibilities to our company, while providing incentives to achieve our business and financial objectives. While comparisons to market data can be useful in assessing competitiveness of compensation, we believe that our executive compensation also should be internally consistent. Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the total compensation paid to our CEO and our other executive officers, which allows a comparison for internal pay equity purposes and allows the committee to analyze both the individual elements of compensation (including the compensation mix) as well as the aggregate total amount of compensation.

Market Considerations. Considerations. When making compensation decisions, we have also looked atcompared the compensation of our executive officers relative to the compensation paid to executives ofcomparably-sized companies engaged in businesses similar to ours, (althoughalthough we do not benchmark our compensation to any particular group of companies).companies. In doing so,comparing compensation, we have considered market data, executive compensation surveys, advice of compensation consultants and other information related to compensation levels and practices. We

29


believe, however, that any such comparison should be merely a point of reference and not the determinative factor for our executives’ compensation. The purpose of the comparison is to inform, but not supplant, the analyses of internal pay equity and individual performance that we consider when making compensation decisions. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has discretion in determining the nature and extent of its use of comparative compensation information.

When reviewing executive compensation, the committeeCompensation Committee may also consider our company’s performance during the person’s tenure and the anticipated level of compensation that would be required to replace the person with someone of comparable experience and skill. In addition to our periodic compensation review, we also regularly monitor market conditions and may adjust compensation levels as necessary to remain competitive and retain valuable employees.

These principles apply to compensation policies for all of our executive officers. We do not follow the principles in a mechanistic fashion; rather, we apply experience and judgment in determining the appropriate mix of compensation for each individual.

Elements of Compensation

In 2018,2022, the principal components of compensation for our named executive officersNEOs were:

 

Base salary;

 

LOGOShort-term incentive awards for the 2022 calendar year performance period;

Long-term incentive awards granted on July 1, 2021 for three consecutive annual performance periods commencing July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2024, and long-term incentive awards granted on May 12, 2022 for a 3-year performance period; and

Employee Benefits (medical, dental, life & disability insurance, 401(k) plan, and other customary employee benefits).

Base Salary

TheBase salaries are established for each salaried position, of each ofincluding the positions held by our salaried employees, including our named executive officers, is assigned a salary grade at the commencement of employment. The salary grade, which is reviewed periodically, considersNEOs, after considering objective criteria relevant to the position, such as the position’s level of financial and operational responsibility and supervisory duties, as well as the education and skills required to perform the functions of the position. Each salary grade has a designated salary range. Within each grade, salaries are determined within the applicable salary range based primarily onposition, and subjective factors such as the employee’s contribution to our company and individual performance. On occasion, an employee’s compensation may be fixed at a level above the maximum level for the employee’s salary grade in response to a subjective determination that the employee’s compensation, if set at the maximum level for his or her grade, would be below the level merited by the employee’s contributions to our company.

The Compensation Committee recognizes that Mr. Edwards’our CEO’s compensation as CEO should reflect his greater policy- and decision-making authority and his higher level of responsibility with respect to our strategic direction and our financial and operating results. At January 1, 2019,December 31, 2022, our CEO’s annual base salary was approximately 94%59% higher than the annual base salary for the next highest-paid named executive officerNEO and approximately 130%61% higher than the average annual base salary for allour other NEOs.

The Compensation Committee reviews base salaries of our other named executive officers.

In typical years, base salaries are reviewedexecutives, including our NEOs, at least annually and may also be adjustedadjust salaries from time to time to realign salaries with external market levels after taking into accountconsidering individual responsibilities, performance and contribution to our company, experience, internal pay equity and budgetary issues. Since 2014, however, crude oil prices declined significantly and oil markets have been volatile and unpredictable.

The depressed fundamentals infollowing table shows the oil and gas industry caused most oil companies and exploration and production companies to significantly reduce their capital spending plans, which in turn negatively impacted our business. As a result of the depressed market, we undertook numerous cost-cutting measures, includingreductions-in-force and freezes on general salary increases and new hiring. Consistent with those measures, with the exception of increases resulting from promotions,annual base salaries for each of our named executive officers were not increased during 2018,NEOs as of January 1, 2022:

Name

Title

Base Salary ($)

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

President and CEO

700,000

Dominic A. Savarino

Senior Vice President and CFO

440,000

David L. Roland

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

405,600

On May 7, 2021, we do not plan to increase executive base salaries for 2019.

Whenappointed Mr. Wolford as our previous CFO resigned, Scott L. Kornblau, our then-Vice President and Treasurer, was appointed as our acting CFO. In recognition of his increased duties and responsibilities as acting CFO, Mr. Kornblau received supplemental payments of $17,000 for each month that he served in such interim capacity. Mr. Kornblau was appointed Senior Vice President and CFO on July 1, 2018, and the Compensation Committee approvedCEO with an increase in Mr. Kornblau’s annual base salary of $700,000. In 2021, to reduce costs, our executives, including the NEOs, agreed to a voluntary temporary 5%

30


reduction in base salary effective from $222,784 to $410,000, to reflect the promotion.

On JanuaryAugust 16, 2021 through April 1, 2019, Ronald Woll was promoted2022. After considering market compensation information and receiving advice and recommendations from Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer to Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer, andLB&C, effective August 1, 2022, the Compensation Committee approved a corresponding5% increase in annual base salary for Mr. Woll from $435,435Wolford to $515,630.$735,000, and a 6% increase in base salary for Mr. Roland to $430,000.

Annual Cash2022 Short-Term Incentive AwardsProgram

OurIn April 2022, our Compensation Committee approved our 2022 Incentive Compensation Plan, is intended to promote company performance objectives and to recognizewhich covered certain employees who contributed toof our executives, including our NEOs. The 2022 Incentive Plan provided the company’s achievements. The plan providesexecutives the opportunity to earn cash compensation that iswas at-risk on an annual basis and iswas contingent on achievement of high individualcertain specified performance and an annual company financial performance goal,metrics, in addition to applicable award capscaps. The plan’s target award levels were developed based on a combination of factors, including our compensation philosophy, market compensation data and the exerciseexecutive’s experience, leadership, prior contribution to the company’s success and individual performance. The plan was designed to reward executives for achieving certain performance goals that are important to the success of negative discretionour company. Performance under the 2022 Incentive Plan was measured from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022.

Under the 2022 Incentive Plan, individual target awards were equal to a fixed percentage of base salary. The 2022 target awards for the Company’s NEOs are set forth below:

Name

2022 Cash Incentive Target
(% of base salary)

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

100

Dominic A. Savarino

75

David L. Roland

75

The Compensation Committee determined the following performance metrics for the 2022 Incentive Plan, each of which is weighted as set forth below:

EBITDA (70%);

Health, Safety and Environment (20%); and

Key Strategic Initiatives (10%).

Under the 2022 Incentive Plan, the payout based on the performance metrics was determined based on the level of achievement as determined by the Compensation Committee as described below.

For annual incentive awards under our Incentive Compensation Plan, performance is measured with respectrelative to the pre-established goals, expressed as a percentage of the 2022 cash incentive target amount specified above, according to the following table:

Level of Achievement

Payout Percentage (%)

Below Threshold

0

Threshold

50

Target

100

Stretch

150

If performance fell between the designated plan fiscal year. The annualpoints in the table above, the incentive payout amount would be determined by straight-line linear interpolation (except that no incentive is paid for performance below threshold).

31


Under the 2022 Incentive Plan, the EBITDA performance goal under the plan and the cap on each participating executive’s award are established by theis calculated as follows:

Contract Drilling Revenue

Less Direct Rig Costs

Less Indirect Overhead

Less Shorebase

Less G&A

Less Maintenance Capex.

The Compensation Committee during the first calendar quarter of the performance year. Annual incentive award payments under the plan are paid in cash in an amount reviewed and approved by the committee and are ordinarily made in the first quarter following the completion of the performance year, after the actual financial results for that year have been determined and the committee has determined whether applicable performance goals have been met.

Our Incentive Compensation Plan specifies an overall general cap that limits the maximum amount payable under the plan to any participant to $7.5 million per year. However, as described below, the Compensation Committee also establishes a lower separate cap on the amount of annual cash incentive award that can be paid to an executive officer in any given year. In addition, the committee retains the authority under the plan to reduce or eliminate these awards, a concept called negative discretion, when the committee deems appropriate.

Under our Incentive Compensation Plan, participants who cease to be employed by us before the end of a performance period due to retirement (defined in the plan as termination without cause at age 60 or older), death or disability are eligible to receive an annual cash incentive award that is prorated to the employment termination date but based upon the actual performance for the entire performance period.

Historically, the performance goal under our Incentive Compensation Plan has required attainment of apre-determined level of adjusted EBITDA during the applicable plan year. Under the plan, the committee employs factors that are both quantitative (attainment of the performance goal) and qualitative (the committee’s assessment of the individual’s performance and the committee’s exercise of negative discretion). For 2018, the committee established a performance goal for executive officers under the plan expressed as an amount of target adjusted EBITDA. The committee selected adjusted EBITDA as the appropriate financialprimary performance measure for 2018metric under the 2022 Incentive Plan because adjusted EBITDAthe measure generally tracks our company’s financial performance and establishes a clear and consistent link between ourthe company’s executive officer cash incentive compensation and ourthe company’s performance.

In addition, Consequently, for purposes of the adjusted2022 Incentive Plan, the calculation of EBITDA formula includes adjustmentsexcluded certain designated revenue, costs and expenses to remove the positive or negative impact of unusual orone-time events that tend towould obscure the core operational performance of our company. For purposes of determining the 2018 adjusted EBITDA performance goal under our Incentive Compensation Plan, adjusted EBITDA was defined as an amount equal to consolidated net income (excluding the cumulative effect

ofcompany, including non-forecasted incentive compensation expenses, expenses associated with mergers, acquisitions or other strategic initiatives, if any, changeand revenue, costs and expenses incurred in accounting principle), for 2018, plusconnection with events or minus, as applicable, the following to the extent excluded in calculating such consolidated net income:

Plus an amount equal to interest expense in accordance with GAAP, for 2018,

Plus or minus the provision for tax expense or benefit accrued for 2018,

Plus the amount of depreciation and amortization expense for 2018,

Minus, without duplication, interest income for 2018, asconditions determined in accordanceconsultation with GAAP, and

Plus or minus, without duplication, the amount ofnon-operating expenses or income for 2018, all as determined in accordance with GAAP,

in each case excluding (i) the effects of any asset impairments recorded during 2018, (ii) any gain or loss on the sale of assets during 2018, (iii) any rig margin—defined as rig revenue less controllable expenses—associated with an asset acquired during 2018, (iv) any expenses (other than capital expenditures) incurred in relation to reactivating any rigs that have been warm- or cold-stacked and (v) the negative financial impact on such year of any transaction entered into with any customer that has the effect of reducing the amount of EBITDA during 2018 in exchange for a commensurate material benefit to be received by the company, such as a drilling contract “blend and extend” transaction. In addition, the Compensation Committee reserved the right to make equitable adjustments to the target adjusted EBITDA or the calculation of the target adjusted EBITDA in recognition of unusual ornon-recurring events affecting the company, in response to changes in applicable laws or regulations, or to account for items of gain, loss or expense determined to be extraordinary or unusual in nature, or infrequent in occurrence, out of our company’s control, or related to the disposal of a segment of a business or related to a change in accounting principles or any other unusual transaction or event occurring after approval of the target adjusted EBITDA.

During the first calendar quarter of 2018, the Compensation Committee approved for our executive officers (including our CEO) a 2018 target adjustedthat negatively impacted EBITDA goal under our Incentive Compensation Plan of $271 million. The target adjusted EBITDA goal established for 2018 was lower than the target goal applicable to 2017 as a result of the continuing negative impact on our business caused by the steep decline in oil prices and customer capital spending and the market oversupply of offshore drilling rigs. For all participating executive officers other than Mr. Edwards, the maximum amount of each annual cash incentive award for 2018 was determined using the following formula approved by the committee during the first calendar quarter of 2018:

A x D

(B + C)/2

A = Eligible Annual Base Salary for 2018

B = $271,000,000 (target adjusted EBITDA for 2018)

C = $561,000,000 (actual adjusted EBITDA for 2017)

D = Actual Adjusted EBITDA for 2018

but in any event the 2018 annual cash incentive award could not exceed the officer’s eligible annual base salary for 2018.

In recognition of his leadership role in setting company policy and strategic planning, during the first calendar quarter of 2018 the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Edwards’ annual cash incentive award for 2018 would be calculated differently than other executive officers. Mr. Edwards was eligible to receive an annual cash incentive award of up to $500,000 upon achievement of 50% of the target goal, up to $1,500,000 upon achievement of the target goal and a maximum of up to $2,500,000 upon achievement of 150% or more of the target goal.

When determining annual cash incentive awards for our executive officers (including Mr. Edwards), the Compensation Committee reserved the right to apply, and historically has applied, its discretion to lower the amount of awards to be paid. In determining whether or not to exercise its negative discretion, the committee has the ability to reassess the individual’s performance during the performance year or to consider any other factors the committee deems relevant. Although the amount ofperiod for a performance award is a functionfuture benefit outside of the actual adjustedperformance period.

The 2022 EBITDA achieved for 2018, failure to achieve the adjusted EBITDA target does not necessarily preclude the payment of an awardperformance targets under the plan or otherwise, but rather has the effect generally of reducing the amount that would have been payable if the target had been achieved.

In February 2019, the Compensation Committee determined that, for purposes of consideration of 2018 annual cash incentive awards, we achieved adjusted EBITDA for 2018 of approximately $334 million. The committee then evaluated the individual performance during the year of each participating executive and authorized annual cash incentive awards under the Incentive Compensation Plan. In each case, the committee exercised its business judgment to apply negative discretion to authorize awards in amounts that were significantly less than the maximum amounts available for awards. Annual cash incentive awards for 2018 were paid in February 2019. The“Non-Equity2022 Incentive Plan Compensation” column ofwere as follows (with straight-line linear interpolation applied between the2018 Summary Compensation Table below reflects the annual cash incentive awards that our named executive officers received for 2018.

In addition to overall company performance, when considering the 2018 annual cash incentive awards paid to our named executive officers under our Incentive Compensation Plan, the Compensation Committee also considered the individual performance and accomplishments of each officer. For example, when considering the award paid to Mr. Edwards, among the factors the committee took into consideration was Mr. Edwards’ effective leadership in achieving positive financial results in a challenging market and our achievement of important strategic objectives during the year, such as increasing operating efficiency and safety and developing innovations to reduce the cost of offshore drilling projects. When considering the award paid to Mr. Woll, among the factors that the committee considered were his leadership in progressing corporate development strategies and his successful efforts in pursuing new rig contract opportunities. When considering the award paid to Mr. Kornblau, the committee considered his leadership and efforts in managing and improving our liquidity position. When considering the award paid to Mr. Roland, the committee considered his contributions and leadership in achieving positive litigation results during the year. When considering the award paid to Mr. Roth, the committee considered his leadership in improving operating fleet efficiency and managing important customer relationships.

Executive Retention Payments. The Board recognizes that it is critical to retain key company leaders who are instrumental to achieving our business and strategic plans, particularly in a depressed offshore drilling market. Consequently, in January 2017, the Board adopted the 2017 Retention Plan upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee and made retention awards under the plan to Messrs. Edwards and Woll. In accordance with the 2017 Retention Plan, in February 2018 we paid Messrs. Edwards and Woll a lump sum retention payment in cash, and in February 2019 we paid each of them a second lump sum retention payment in cash. To qualify for the payments, the executives were required to remain actively employed by us through the respective payment date, not be on a leave (other than a legally protected leave), not be subject to any performance improvement plan and have complied with all company agreements and policies. The amounts received by the executives were:

Executive

  2018 Retention
Payment ($)
   2019 Retention
Payment ($)
 

Marc Edwards

   1,500,000    1,500,000 

Ronald Woll

   750,000    750,000 

As a result of the continuation of the depressed market, in June 2018 we entered into an extended retention arrangement with Mr. Woll to cover 2019 under the same general terms as the 2017 Retention Plan. Pursuant to the 2019 extended arrangement, Mr. Woll will be paid $750,000 in a lump sum in cash during the first quarter of 2020 if he remains actively employed through January 1, 2020 and meets the other conditions for the payment.

Long-Term Stock-Based and Cash-Incentive Awards

We have structured our long-term incentive compensation to achieve an appropriate balance between rewarding performance and encouraging employee retention and stock ownership. Stock-based awards and long-term cash incentive awards to the named executive officers are designed to reward them for taking actions that benefit the long-term performance of our company and enhance stockholder value. Because the awards will be forfeited in most circumstances if an executive voluntarily leaves our company before the awards vest, these awards are also designed to promote the retention of our executive officers during the vesting period. As a result, these awards recognize performance over a longer term and encourage executive officers to continue their employment with us. In addition, the stock-based awards directly link the ultimate value of the awards to the price of our common stock. All of these elements further serve to align the executives’ interest with those of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee reviews our long-term incentive program each year to ensure that the key elements of this program continue to meet the objectives described above.

There is nopre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash ornon-cash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation; however, at executive management levels, the Compensation Committee intends for a significant portion of compensation to be performance-based and linked to longer-term incentives.

Approval and Granting Process. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all RSU and long-term cash incentive awards made to executive officers, regardless of amount. In accordance with our Equity Plan, the Compensation Committee has granted to Mr. Edwards the authority to approve and grant to any employee, other than an executive officer, time-vesting RSUs with a grant date value of $25,000 or less, under terms that have been approved by the committee. We believe that this delegation is beneficial because it enables smaller awards to be made more efficiently, which is particularly important with respect to attracting, hiring and retainingnon-executive employees. With the exception of significant promotions, new hires or unusual circumstances, we intend to make most awards of RSUs and other long-term awards to employees on April 1 of each year to enable consideration of individual and company performance from the previous year.

Award of RSUs and Long-Term Performance Cash Incentives to CEO in 2018. In April 2018, Mr. Edwards was awarded a target number of 115,207 performance-vesting RSUs, which was determined based on a target grant date value of $1,750,000, as determined by the Compensation Committee, and the volume-weighted average price per share of our common stock on the NYSE for the 10 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant, which we refer to as VWAP. RSUs are contractual rights to receive shares of our common stock in the future if the applicable vesting conditions are met. RSUs were deemed by the committee to be advantageous because they align the interests of named executive officers with achievement of longer-term financial objectives that enhance stockholder value and further strengthen our link between pay and performance. The value of an RSU is equal to the market value of one share of our common stock; as a result, RSUs can be effective incentives for our superior performers to remain with the company and continue performing during periods of stock market fluctuations. The vesting of RSU awards can be dependent on a number of factors, including continued employment over a specified period and/or the attainment of specified performance targets over a specified period, which we believe further incentivizes our executive officers and aligns their interests more closely with those of our stockholders. The RSUs awarded to Mr. Edwards in 2018 cliff vest in three years subject to our level of achievement of a specified target of average ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to Adjusted Net PP&E (as such terms are defined below) for each of 2018, 2019 and 2020, as set forth in

the table below and subject to the negative discretion of the Compensation Committee to reduce or eliminate the number of the RSUs that would otherwise be eligible to vest: points):

 

  Performance Level  

  

Performance as a

Percentage of Target

EBITDA ($ in millions)
 

RSUs

Vesting (#)

Below Threshold

Less than 50%0

Threshold

  50%52.10 77,189 (67% of target)

Target

  100%61.30 115,207 (100% of target)

MaximumStretch

  150% or greater67.40

The 2022 HSE performance targets under the 2022 Incentive Plan were as follows (with straight-line linear interpolation applied between the points):

HSE Metric

  Target Goal  Threshold Goal  Stretch Goal  Weighting

Lost Time Incident (or LTI) Frequency

  0.10  0.15  0.05  20%

Dropped Object (Zero Incident Operations, or ZIO) Frequency

  0.10  0.15  0.05  20%

Process Safety Barrier Failure

  2-3  <=4  <=1  20%

Environmental Hydrocarbon Spill (ZIO) Frequency

  0.10  0.15  0.05  20%

Performance Standard Work Orders Past Target Finish Date (overdue)

  >5% -10%  <15%  <=5%  20%

The 2022 strategic initiative target under the 2022 Incentive Plan was as follows:

the consummation of any transaction constituting a “Change in Control” under the terms of the Stock Plan;

the consummation of an acquisition by our company of all or substantially all of the assets or voting securities of another company, whether through merger, combination or any other form of transaction;

the consummation of a strategic acquisition by our company of one or more material assets approved by our Board (or Board committee); or

32


the diligent pursuit and completion of activities, to the reasonable satisfaction of our Board (or Board committee), in furtherance of a transaction described above at the direction of our Board (or Board committee), regardless of whether such transaction is consummated within the 2022 Incentive Plan performance period.

In February 2023, for purposes of consideration of 2022 Incentive Plan awards, the Compensation Committee reviewed the company’s financial and HSE performances and the company’s pursuit of strategic initiatives during the plan’s performance period, exercised its business judgment and determined that the NEOs achieved 85.4% of target performance under the plan. As a result, payments under the 2022 Incentive Plan were paid at 85.4% of target amounts, and our NEOs received the following payments pursuant to our 2022 Incentive Plan:

Name

  153,225 (133% of target)2022 Incentive Plan Payments ($)

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

627,690

Dominic A. Savarino

281,820

David L. Roland

275,415

2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards

Award to CEO. In April 2018,connection with his hire as our President and CEO in May 2021, the Compensation Committee approved two incentive awards to Mr. Edwards also receivedWolford pursuant to the terms of our Stock Plan:

222,222 shares of restricted stock, each representing one share of common stock, that vest in three equal installments on May 8, 2021, May 8, 2022 and May 8, 2023, subject to Mr. Wolford’s continuous service or employment through the applicable vesting date (or the CEO Time-Vesting Award); and

777,777 shares of restricted stock, each representing one share of common stock, 100% of which will vest upon achievement of a performance-vesting long-term cash incentiveTotal Equity Value of common stock of $1.0 billion, and 0% of which will vest upon achievement of a Total Equity Value of our common stock of less than $500.0 million, subject to Mr. Wolford’s continuous service or employment through the date of such achievement and the Performance Measurement Date (as defined in the applicable award agreement), or may vest in certain circumstances in connection with a target value“change in control” (as defined in our Stock Plan) (or the CEO Performance-Vesting Award). Straight-line linear interpolation is utilized to determine the appropriate vesting percentage in the event the Total Equity Value falls between $500.0 million and $1.0 billion. Any restricted stock under the CEO Performance-Vesting Award that has not vested by May 8, 2027 will be forfeited.

If Mr. Wolford’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” (as defined in our Stock Plan), due to his death or disability, or by Mr. Wolford for “good reason” (as defined in our Stock Plan), then the number of $1,750,000. The award cliff vestsshares of restricted stock that would have otherwise vested pursuant to the CEO Time-Vesting Award in three yearsthe 12-month period following such termination will immediately vest on the date of such termination, subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable award agreement. However, in the case of any such termination within the period starting six months prior to the occurrence of a “change in control” (as defined in our Stock Plan) and ending 12 months following the occurrence of a change in control, then in lieu of the benefits described in the preceding sentence, the restricted stock pursuant to the CEO Time-Vesting Award will fully vest immediately upon such termination of employment, subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable award agreement. If the CEO Time-Vesting Award is not continued, assumed, replaced, converted or substituted upon the occurrence of a change in control in accordance with our Stock Plan, then the restricted stock will fully vest as of immediately prior to a change in control.

If Mr. Wolford’s employment is terminated by us without cause, due to his death or disability, or by Mr. Wolford for good reason within the period starting six months prior to the occurrence of a change in control

33


and ending 12 months following the occurrence of a change in control, then the restricted stock pursuant to the CEO Performance-Vesting Award will fully vest immediately upon such termination of employment, subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable award agreement.

Mr. Wolford receives all privileges of a stockholder of the company with respect to his shares of restricted stock, including the right to vote any shares underlying the restricted stock and to receive dividends or other distributions.

After reviewing relevant data regarding sales of company stock since May 2021, in July 2022 the Compensation Committee determined that the Performance Measurement Date applicable to the CEO Performance-Vesting Award had occurred. After calculating the company’s highest Total Equity Value from the May 2021 grant date through the Performance Measurement Date in accordance with his award agreement, the company determined that 493,847 shares of performance-vesting restricted stock granted to Mr. Wolford had vested on August 12, 2022. Subsequently, after calculating the company’s highest Total Equity Value from the Performance Measurement Date through December 30, 2022, the company determined that 253,560 additional shares of performance-vesting restricted stock granted to Mr. Wolford had vested as of December 30, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, Mr. Wolford continued to hold the remaining 30,370 unvested shares of performance-vesting restricted stock. Thereafter, on March 1, 2023, the company calculated its highest Total Equity Value since the Performance Measurement Date and determined that Mr. Wolford’s remaining 30,370 shares of performance-vesting restricted stock had vested as of March 1, 2023.

Awards to Other NEOs. As approved by the Compensation Committee, on September 1, 2021 we entered into award agreements for grants made as of July 1, 2021 of incentive awards under our Stock Plan to certain of our key employees, including Messrs. Savarino and Roland, consisting of time-based RSU awards that vest in equal amounts annually over a three-year period and performance-based RSU awards that vest in equal amounts annually over a three-year period subject to annual performance goals.

In addition to the RSU awards granted as of July 1, 2021, Mr. Savarino was granted additional time-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs on October 1, 2021 in connection with his promotion from Vice President and Chief Accounting & Tax Officer to Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on September 20, 2021. The RSUs granted on October 1, 2021 are subject to the same vesting and other terms as his time-based and performance-based RSUs granted as of July 1, 2021.

The number of RSUs included in the July 1, 2021 and October 1, 2021 awards to the NEOs were as follows:

Name

  July 2021
Performance-Vesting
RSUs Granted (#)
   July 2021
Time-Vesting
RSUs Granted (#)
   October 2021
Performance-Vesting
RSUs Granted (#)
   October 2021
Time-Vesting
RSUs Granted (#)
   Total RSUs
Granted in
2021 (#)
 

Dominic A. Savarino

   75,929    50,619    14,602    9,734    150,884 

David L. Roland

   90,530    60,354    —      —      150,884 

The time-based RSUs vest with respect to approximately 1/3 of the RSUs on each of July 1, 2022, July 1, 2023 and July 1, 2024, subject to the recipient’s continuous service or employment through the applicable vesting date. If the recipient is terminated without “cause” (as defined in our Stock Plan) or because of the recipient’s death or disability, then the number of time-based RSUs that would vest on the next two vesting dates will immediately vest on the date of such termination. Upon a termination for cause, all vested and unvested time-based RSUs will immediately be forfeited and cancelled for zero compensation. Upon a termination of service for any other reason, all outstanding and unvested time-based RSUs will immediately be forfeited and cancelled for zero compensation. Upon a “change in control” (as defined in our Stock Plan) of our company, the number of time-based RSUs that would vest on the next two vesting dates will immediately vest, subject to the recipient’s continuous service or employment through consummation of the change in control.

34


The performance-based RSUs vest with respect to up to approximately 1/3 of the RSUs on each of June 30, 2022, June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2024, subject to the recipient’s continuous employment with our company through the applicable vesting date and the level of achievement of the same target of average ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to Adjusted Net PP&E (as such terms are defined below)performance goals for each one-year performance period as determined by the Compensation Committee. For the first performance period from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, the performance-based RSUs were subject to four equally-weighted performance goals, consisting of 2018, 2019(i) five target HSE objectives, (ii) a target amount of adjusted free cash flow, (iii) a target amount of added cumulative contract backlog and 2020,(iv) achievement of strategic initiative goals determined by the Board. The Compensation Committee selected the HSE, financial and backlog performance metrics for the first year performance period because the metrics are considered primary drivers of value for offshore drilling companies and establish a clear and measurable link between the company’s executive long-term incentive compensation and the company’s performance.

The HSE, financial and backlog performance goals for the first performance period from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, along with the results of the company’s actual performance during the performance period, were as set forthfollows (dollar amounts in millions):

HSE Metrics

  Target Goal   Threshold Goal   Stretch Goal   Weighting  Result 

No Regulatory Shutdown

   0    —      —      20  0 

LTI Frequency

   0.10    0.15    0.05    20  .26 

Dropped Object Frequency

   0.10    0.15    0.05    20  .37 

Environmental Spill (ZIO) Frequency

   0.10    0.15    0.05    20  .08 

Well Control Event (bbl influx)

   11-20    >20-30    <11    20  <11 

Financial Metric

  Target Goal   Threshold Goal   Stretch Goal   Result    

Adjusted Free Cash Flow

  $96.5   $72.3   $110.9   $90.2  

Addition of Backlog

  Target Goal   Threshold Goal   Stretch Goal   Result    

Added Backlog

  $349.6   $180.4   $621.9   $694.4  

In August 2022, for purposes of consideration of vesting of the performance-based RSUs applicable to the first year performance period ended June 30, 2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed the above performance period results, exercised its business judgment and determined that the NEOs achieved 88% of target performance. As a result, the performance-based RSUs applicable to the first year performance period vested at 88% of target, and Messrs. Savarino and Roland received the following vested RSUs (before tax withholdings):

Name

Vested Performance-Based RSUs (#)

Dominic A. Savarino

26,558

David L. Roland

26,557

The 2021 RSU performance goals for the second-year period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 of the performance period consist of (i) five target HSE objectives, (ii) a target amount of adjusted EBITDA, (iii) a target amount of added cumulative contract backlog, (iv) four target ESG objectives and (v) achievement of strategic initiative goals determined by the Board. The performance metrics and threshold, target and stretch performance goals applicable to the third-year performance period of the 2021 RSUs, which covers July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024, will be established by the Compensation Committee in 2023.

Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, the percentage of the performance-vesting awards eligible to vest may range from 0% to 100% of the target amount, based on the specified levels of achievement of the applicable performance goals. In no event will the recipient be eligible to earn more than 100% of the target amount for any performance period. If the recipient is terminated without cause or because of the recipient’s death or disability, then the recipient will remain eligible to vest, subject to achievement of

35


the performance conditions, in the table belownumber of performance-based RSUs that would vest on the next two vesting dates. Upon a termination for cause, all vested and unvested performance-based RSUs will immediately be forfeited and cancelled for zero compensation. Upon a termination of service for any other reason, all outstanding and unvested performance-based RSUs will immediately be forfeited and cancelled for zero compensation. Upon a change in control of our company, the number of performance-based RSUs that would vest on the next two vesting dates will immediately vest to the extent of the achievement of certain performance goals through the date of the change in control, or based on deemed achievement target performance for certain other performance goals.

The NEOs do not have any privileges of a stockholder of the company with respect to any RSUs, including any right to vote any shares underlying the RSUs or to receive dividends or other distributions; provided that, if the company declares any dividend while the RSUs are outstanding, the holder will be credited a dividend equivalent, which will be subject to the negative discretion ofsame vesting conditions applicable to the RSU and will vest only if the RSU vests and will be forfeited if the RSU is forfeited. Any such dividend equivalents will be settled and paid to the holder following the date on which the RSU vests. All RSUs may be settled in cash or our common stock.

2022 Long-Term Incentive Awards

As approved by the Compensation Committee, on May 12, 2022 we granted incentive awards under our Stock Plan to reduce or eliminatecertain of our key employees, including our CEO and other NEOs, consisting of time-based RSU awards that vest in equal amounts annually over a three-year period and performance-based RSU awards that vest based on the amount that would otherwise be eligibleachievement of a target stock appreciation performance goal over a three-year period. The number of RSUs included in the May 12, 2022 awards to vest:our NEOs were as follows:

 

  Performance Level  

Performance as a

Percentage of Target

Dollar Amount

Vesting ($)

Below Threshold

Less than 50%0

Threshold

50%1,172,500 (67% of target)

Target

100%1,750,000 (100% of target)

Maximum

150% or greater2,327,500 (133% of target)

Name

  Performance-Vesting
RSUs Granted (#)
   Time-Vesting
RSUs Granted (#)
 

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

   274,528    117,655 

Dominic A. Savarino

   85,790    36,767 

David L. Roland

   60,053    25,737 

The time-based RSUs vest with respect to approximately 1/3 of the RSUs on each of May 12, 2023, May 12, 2024 and May 12, 2025, subject to the recipient’s continuous employment through the applicable vesting date. If the recipient is terminated for “cause” (as defined in the award agreement), all vested and unvested time-based RSUs will immediately be forfeited and cancelled for zero compensation. In connection with a “change in control” (as defined in the award agreement) in which the award is continued, assumed or replaced with an economically equivalent equity-based award that contains substantially comparable terms and conditions (or a Rollover Award), the Rollover Award will vest in accordance with the above vesting schedule. In the eventcase of a Rollover Award, upon the occurrence of a termination of the recipient’s employment (i) by our company without cause, (ii) by the recipient for “good reason” (as defined in the award agreement) or (iii) by reason of the recipient’s death or disability during the 12-month period following such change in control, such award will 100% vest as of the date on which such termination occurred. In connection with a change in control in which the award does not become a Rollover Award, a pro-rated portion of the number of RSUs scheduled to vest on the next vesting date (to the extent not previously vested) will immediately vest in full, subject to the recipient’s continued service through the consummation of the change in control and, to the extent not continued, assumed or replaced in connection with the change in control, any remaining unvested time-based RSUs will immediately be forfeited and cancelled for zero compensation. Upon a termination of service for any other reason, all outstanding and unvested time-based RSUs will be forfeited and cancelled for zero compensation.

The performance-based RSUs vest based on the level of achievement of our stock price through May 12, 2025 (unless terminated earlier in connection with a “change in control” as defined in the award agreement), subject to the recipient’s continuous employment through the end of the performance fallingperiod. On the May 12, 2022 grant date, the 30 consecutive trading day volume-weighted average price of our common stock, or

36


30-day VWAP, was $7.34. If, at any time during the three-year performance period, the highest 30-day VWAP of our common stock equals $8.37, then 1/3 of the RSUs will vest. If, at any time during the three-year performance period, the highest 30-day VWAP of our common stock equals $9.55, then 2/3 of the RSUs will vest. If, at any time during the three-year performance period, the highest 30-day VWAP of our common stock equals or exceeds $10.87, then 100% of the RSUs will vest. If the highest 30-day VWAP of our common stock falls between any of the levels stated above linearthresholds, straight-line interpolation will be applied to determine the amountnumber of the award eligible toRSUs that will vest.

For purposes of the performance-vesting RSU awards and performance-vesting long-term cash incentive awards granted in 2018, “Adjusted EBITDA” means, for If, at any calendar year, an amount equal to consolidated net income (excluding the cumulative effect of any change in accounting principle) for such year plus or minus, as applicable, the following to the extent excluded in calculating such consolidated net income: (a) plus an amount equal to interest expense for such year, (b) plus or minus the provision for accrued tax expense or benefit accrued for such year, (c) plus the amount of depreciation and amortization expense for such year, (d) minus, without duplication, interest income for such year, (e) plus or minus, without duplication, the amount ofnon-operating expenses or income for such year, and (f) excluding (i) the effects of any asset impairments recorded during such year, (ii) any gain or loss on the sale of assets during such year, (iii) any rig margin— defined as rig revenue less controllable expenses—associated with an asset acquiredtime during the three-year performance period, (iv) any expenses (other than capital expenditures) incurred in relation to reactivating any rigs that have been warm- or cold-stacked and (v) the negative financial impact on such year of any transaction entered into with any customer that has the effect of reducing the amount of EBITDA during such year in exchange for a commensurate material benefit to be received by the company, such as a drilling contract “blend and extend” transaction.

For purposes of the performance-vesting RSU awards and performance-vesting long-term cash incentive awards granted in 2018, “Adjusted Net PP&E” means, at any date of determination, on a consolidated basis, an amount equal to the net book value of all property, plant and equipment (including, without limitation, land, mineral rights, buildings, structures, machinery and equipment), plus an amount equal to the net book value of all property, plant and equipment (including, without limitation, land, mineral rights, buildings, structures, machinery and equipment) classified on our balance sheet as held for sale, in each case excluding, over the elapsed portion of the performance period to the date of such determination, (i) the effects of any impairment of assets and (ii) the net book value added to or removed from net property, plant and equipment or assets held for sale as a result of any asset acquired or sold during such period.

As an additional condition to the vesting of RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards granted to him in 2018, Mr. Edwards is required to remain our employee through the vesting date, except as follows:

Upon Mr. Edwards’ termination without “Cause” or for “Good Reason” on or after April 1, 2020, he will receive 50% of his RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period; and

Upon termination of Mr. Edwards’ employment for any other reason (other than for “Cause”), including voluntary resignation, on or after April 1, 2020, he will receive 20% of his RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period.

Under Mr. Edwards’ RSU award agreement and long-term cash incentive award agreement, “Cause” means any of the following events: (i) conviction for committing a felony; (ii) dishonesty in the course of fulfilling employment duties; (iii) willful and deliberate failure to perform employment duties in any material respect; or (iv) such other events as shall be determined in good faith by the Board.

Under Mr. Edwards’ RSU award agreement and long-term cash incentive award agreement, “Good Reason” means any of the following events: (i) the assignment of duties that are materially inconsistent with his position (including his status, offices, titles and reporting relationships), authority, duties or responsibilities; (ii) actions by us that have resulted in a substantial diminution in his position, authority, duties or responsibilities; (iii) a substantial breach by us of any material obligation to him as our employee; (iv) any failure to maintain him as President and Chief Executive Officer prior to the vesting date; (v) any reduction in base salary or target annual bonus opportunity prior to the vesting date; (vi) any failure by us to nominate him as a director at each election prior to the vesting date; or (vii) any failure by us to obtain the assumption in writing of our obligation to perform the award agreement by any successor to all or substantially all of our business or assets after a merger, consolidation, sale or similar transaction.

The RSUs do not have voting rights. We reserve the right to settle any vested RSU by cash payment in lieu of stock. In accordance with his RSU award agreement, upon our payment of any cash or stock dividend in respecthighest 30-day VWAP of our common stock prior to vesting of an RSU award, Mr. Edwards will be credited with a number of additional RSUs based upon the amount of the dividend that would be payable with respect to shares underlying the RSUs outstanding on the record date for such dividend (based on the target number of RSUs), subject to the same vesting schedule and conditions as the original RSUs to which they are attributable. The RSU award agreement and the long-term cash incentive award agreement also obligate Mr. Edwards to comply with certain restrictive covenants, including obligations of confidentiality, a prohibition on solicitation of our employees for a period of two years after termination of employment and a prohibition on competition for a period of one year after termination of employment.

Award of RSUs and Long-Term Cash Incentives to Other Named Executive Officers in 2018. In April 2018, ournon-CEO named executive officers were granted RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards. The majoritydoes not reach $8.37, then none of the RSUs will vest, and long-term cash incentive awards granted to those named executive officers cliff vest under the same performance standardsperformance-based RSUs will be forfeited and percentage caps applicable to thecancelled for zero compensation. Vested time-based RSUs and long-termperformance-based RSUs may be settled by the company in cash incentive awards granted to Mr. Edwards in 2018, and a smaller number of RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards will separately time-vest (half two years after the grant date and half three years after the grant date). The number of RSUs awarded to each of these officers in April 2018 was determined based on the VWAP and a designated

target grant date value for performance-vesting RSUs and a designated grant date value for time-vesting RSUs, as set forth below:

                 Name                

  Target Grant Date Value of
Performance-Vesting RSUs ($)
   Performance-Vesting
RSUs Granted (#)
   Grant Date Value of
Time-Vesting RSUs ($)
   Time-Vesting
RSUs
Granted (#)
 

Ronald Woll

   180,000    11,850    120,000    7,900 

Scott L. Kornblau

   45,000    2,962    30,000    1,975 

David L. Roland

   120,000    7,900    80,000    5,267 

Thomas M. Roth

   97,500    6,419    65,000    4,279 

The target value of performance-vesting long-term cash incentive awards and the value of time-vesting long-term cash incentive awards granted to each of these officers in April 2018 were as follows:

                 Name                

  Target Value of Performance-
Vesting Cash Incentives ($)
  Value of Time-Vesting
Cash Incentives ($)

Ronald Woll

  180,000  120,000

Scott L. Kornblau

    45,000    30,000

David L. Roland

  120,000    80,000

Thomas M. Roth

    97,500    65,000

As an additional condition to the vesting of RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards granted to our fournon-CEO named executive officers in April 2018, the officers are required to remain employed by us through the vesting date, except as follows:

Upon termination without “Cause” on or after April 1, 2020, the officer will receive 50% of his performance-vesting RSUs and performance-vesting long-term cash incentive award that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period; and

Upon retirement at age 63 or older before the end of the3-year performance period, the officer will receive a pro rata portion of his performance-vesting RSUs and performance-vesting long-term cash incentive award that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period.

“Cause” is defined for our fournon-CEO named executive officers the same as it is defined under Mr. Edwards’ RSU award agreement and long-term cash incentive award agreement as described above.

In addition to the April 1, 2018 RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards, Mr. Kornblau was also awarded RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards on July 1, 2018 in connection with his promotion to CFO. The majority of the RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards granted to Mr. Kornblau in July 2018 cliff vest under the same performance standards and percentage caps applicable to the RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards granted to him in April 2018, and a smaller number of RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards separately time-vest (half two years after the grant date and half three years after the grant date). The number of RSUs awarded to Mr. Kornblau in July 2018 was determined based on the VWAP and a designated target grant date value for performance-vesting RSUs and a designated grant date value for time-vesting RSUs, as set forth below:

Target Grant Date Value of

Performance-Vesting RSUs ($)

  Performance-Vesting
RSUs Granted (#)
  Grant Date Value of
Time-Vesting RSUs ($)
  Time-Vesting
RSUs Granted (#)

52,500

  2,662  35,000  1,775

The target value of the performance-vesting long-term cash incentive award and the value of the time-vesting long-term cash incentive award granted to Mr. Kornblau in July 2018 were as follows:

Target Value of

Performance-Vesting

        Cash Incentives ($)        

  Value of Time-Vesting
Cash Incentives ($)
52,500  35,000

As an additional condition to the vesting of RSUs and long-term cash incentives awarded to Mr. Kornblau in July 2018, he is required to remain employed by us through the vesting date, except that upon termination without “Cause” on or after July 1, 2020, Mr. Kornblau will receive 50% of his performance-vesting RSUs and performance-vesting long-term cash incentive award that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period.

The RSUs do not have voting rights. We reserve the right to settle any vested RSU by cash payment in lieu of stock.

If we pay a special cash dividend in respect of our common stock prior to vesting of an RSU award, each officer will be credited with a dollar amount equal to the special cash dividend multiplied by the total number of his unvested RSUs that are outstanding on the record daterecipient is terminated for the dividend (based on the target number of RSUs with respect to performance-vesting RSUs). Any dividend equivalent rights credited as described in the foregoing sentence are payable in cash and are subject to the same vesting, payment and other terms, conditions and restrictions as the original RSUs to which they relate. No crediting of dividend equivalent rights will be made with respect to any regular or ordinary cash dividends. We did not declare any special cash dividends during 2018.

The RSU and long-term cash incentive award agreements also obligate the above officers to comply with certain restrictive covenants, including obligations of confidentiality, a prohibition on solicitation of our employees for a period of two years after termination of employment and a prohibition on competition for a period of one year after termination of employment.

Performance-Vesting RSUs Realized for the Performance Period Ending in 2018. The performance-vesting RSUs that were granted by the Compensation Committee to our named executive officers in April 2016 for the three-year performance period beginning January 1, 2016 and ending December 31, 2018 vested on February 7, 2019 upon determination of the level of attainment of the performance goals and the number of RSUs eligible to vest. These RSUs cliff vested subject to our level of achievement of a target average ratio of 5.8% of Adjusted EBITDA“cause” (as defined in the applicable grantaward agreement) to Adjusted Net PP&E, all vested and unvested performance-based RSUs will be forfeited and cancelled for zero compensation. Upon the occurrence of a termination of the recipient’s employment (i) by our company without cause, (ii) by the recipient for “good reason” (as defined above) for each of 2016, 2017 and 2018, subject toin the negative discretionaward agreement) or (iii) by reason of the Compensation Committee to reducerecipient’s death or disability, the number ofperformance-based RSUs will vest as set forth above (without regard for the RSUsrequirement that would otherwise be eligible to vest. Followingthe recipient remain in continuous employment through the end of the performance period) based on the highest 30-day VWAP achieved during the performance period prior to the Compensation Committee evaluatedtermination, and any unvested performance-based RSUs will immediately be forfeited and cancelled for zero compensation.

In connection with a change in control in which there is a Rollover Award of performance-based RSUs, the Rollover Award will vest based on the 30-day VWAP as set forth above (subject to equitable adjustable to account for such change in control). In the case of a Rollover Award, upon the occurrence of a termination of the recipient’s employment (i) by our company without cause, (ii) by the recipient for good reason or (iii) by reason of the recipient’s death or disability, during the 12-month period following the change in control, the performance-based RSUs will vest as follows:

If the change in control occurred prior to the first anniversary of the grant date and the consideration (on a per share basis) that holders of our company’s common stock receive in connection with the change in control in which our company is not the surviving entity (or the Transaction Share Price) equaled or exceeded $8.37, then 100% of the Rollover Award will vest;

If the change in control occurred on or after the first anniversary but prior to the second anniversary of the grant date and the Transaction Share Price equaled $8.37, then 1/3 of the Rollover Award will vest and become non-forfeitable, and if the Transaction Share Price equaled or exceeded $9.55, then 100% of the Rollover Award will vest and become non-forfeitable (if the Transaction Share Price falls between either of the above thresholds, straight-line interpolation will be applied to determine how much of the Rollover Award will vest and become non-forfeitable); and

If the change in control occurred on or after the second anniversary but prior to the third anniversary of the grant date and the Transaction Share Price equaled $8.37, then 1/3 of the Rollover Award will vest and become non-forfeitable, and if the Transaction Share Price equaled or exceeded $10.87, then 100% of the Rollover Award will vest and become non-forfeitable (if the Transaction Share Price falls between either of the above thresholds, straight-line interpolation will be applied to determine how much of the Rollover Award will vest and become non-forfeitable).

Upon the occurrence of a change in control in which the performance-based RSU award does not become a Rollover Award, the award’s performance forperiod will terminate upon the three-year periodconsummation of the change in control and determined performance to be 8.5%, which was above the target. After giving effect toperformance-based RSUs will vest upon the committee’s exerciseconsummation of negative discretion with respect to each such award, the committee determined to vestchange in control as follows:

If the Transaction Share Price equaled $8.37, then 1/3 of the RSUs at target levelwill vest;

If the Transaction Share Price equaled $9.55, then 2/3 of the RSUs will vest;

37


If the Transaction Share Price equaled or exceeded $10.87, then 100% of the RSUs will vest; and

Any unvested performance-based RSUs will immediately be forfeited and cancelled for zero compensation upon the following numberconsummation of performance-vesting RSUs vested for each named executive officer: Mr. Edwards, 155,857 RSUs; Mr. Woll, 16,031 RSUs; Mr. Kornblau, 1,781 RSUs; Mr. Roland, 8,683 RSUs; and Mr. Roth, 5,650 RSUs.the change in control.

Personal Benefits, Perquisites and Employee Benefits

We do not offer many perquisites traditionally offered to executives ofsimilarly-sized companies. Perquisites and any other similar personal benefits generally offered to our executive officers are substantially the same as those generally available on anon-discriminatory basis to all of our full-time salaried employees, such as medical and dental insurance, life insurance, disability insurance, a 401(k) plan with a company match and other customary employee benefits. We make contributions for group term life insurance, spouse/dependent life insurance, and long-term disability insurance for our employees, including our named executive officers,NEOs, as indicated in the20182022 Summary Compensation Tablebelow. Business-related relocation benefits may be reimbursed on acase-by-case basis.

We maintain a defined contribution plan (which we refer to as our Retirement Plan) designed to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which, together with the regulations promulgated thereunder, we refer to as the Code). Pursuant to our Retirement Plan, in 20182022 we matched 50% of the first 6% of each participant’s compensation contributed. Effective on January 1, 2023, we increased the company match to 100% of the first 5%4% of each participant’s compensation contributed. In addition, under our Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (which we refer to as our SERP), in past years we contributehave contributed to participants any portion of the applicable percentage of the base salary contribution and the matching contribution that cannot be contributed under the Retirement Plan because of the limitations within the Code. Participants in this plan are a select group of our management or highly compensated employees, including the named executive officers,our NEOs, and are fully vested in all amounts paid into the plan. As a result of our chapter 11 reorganization, we did not contribute any amounts into our SERP during 2020, 2021 or 2022. In October 2022, our Compensation Committee approved the resumption of contributions to our SERP for 2023.

Supplemental Severance Plan. On September 1, 2021, we issued the Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. Supplemental Severance Plan, effective as of September 21, 2021, for eight key employees, including Messrs. Savarino and Roland. The Supplemental Severance Plan provides the participants with protection for loss of salary and benefits in the event of certain involuntary terminations of employment in order to assist our company in retaining its senior management team.

The Supplemental Severance Plan provides that if an eligible participant’s employment is terminated by our company without “cause” or as a result of the recipient’s death or disability or a resignation for “good reason” (each of “cause” and “good reason” as defined in the Supplemental Severance Plan), the participant will be eligible to receive a lump-sum cash payment in an amount equal to the sum of the participant’s annual base salary and annual target bonus and, subject to the participant’s election of continuation of health care coverage pursuant to COBRA, we will pay the full cost of the participant’s COBRA premiums for 12 months from the date of the termination. If an eligible participant’s employment is terminated by our company without cause or due to a resignation for good reason within six months prior to, or one year following, a change in control of our company, the participant will instead be eligible to receive a lump-sum cash payment in an amount equal to 1.5 times the sum of the participant’s annual base salary and annual target bonus and, subject to the participant’s election of COBRA coverage, we will pay the full cost of the participant’s COBRA premiums for 18 months from the date of such termination. Receipt of severance benefits is subject to the participant’s execution of a release of any claims against our company and agreement with restrictive covenants, including a covenant of non-solicitation of customers and employees.

38


Indemnification of Directors and Executive Officers

Our Bylaws provideCertificate of Incorporation provides certain rights of indemnification to our directors and employeesofficers (including our executive officers) in connection with legal actions brought against them by reason of the fact that they are or were a director officer, employee or agentofficer of our company, to the fullest extent permitted by law. Our Certificate of Incorporation also eliminates the personal liability of our directors to our company or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director to the fullest extent permitted by law. Our Certificate of Incorporation also provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, non-employee directors and their affiliates (other than our company, any of its subsidiaries or their respective officers or employees) shall not be liable to our company or our stockholders or to any affiliate of our company for breach of any fiduciary duty solely by reason of the fact that such non-employee director or affiliate (A) engaged in or possessed interests in other business ventures of any type or description, including those engaged in the same or similar business activities or lines of business in which our company or any of our subsidiaries now engages or proposes to engage, or (B) competed with our company or any of our subsidiaries, on its own account, or in partnership with, or as an employee, officer, director or stockholder of any other person (other than our company or any of our subsidiaries). In addition, except to the extent provided otherwise in our Certificate of Incorporation, to the fullest extent permitted by law, such persons shall not be liable to our company or our stockholders or to any of our subsidiaries for breach of any duty (fiduciary, contractual or otherwise) as a stockholder or director of our company by reason of the fact that such person does not present certain corporate opportunities to our company.

Our Bylaws contain provisions that provide for the indemnification of officers and directors as authorized by law, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth therein.

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers that generally provide for us to indemnify the applicable indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law (subject to certain limitations) as well as the advancement of all expenses incurred by the director or executive officer in connection with a legal proceeding arising out of their service to our company, in each case to the extent permitted by applicable law.

In addition, as authorized by our Bylaws, we have an existing directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy.

Risk Management Considerations

Our Compensation Committee has concluded that the company’sour compensation program does not encourage excessive or inappropriate risk-taking. Several elements of our 2018 compensation program are designed to promote the creation of long-term value and thereby discourage behavior that leads to excessive risk:

 

Our 2022 compensation program consistsconsisted of both fixed and variable compensation. The fixed (or salary) portion iswas designed to provide a steady income regardless of our stockfinancial performance, in part so that executives do not focus exclusively on stockshort-term financial performance to the detriment of other important business metrics.metrics and objectives. The variable (annual cash incentive, long-term cash(short-term incentive and equity award) portionslong-term incentive) portion of compensation arewas designed to reward both short-term and long-termkey employees only if we achieve exceptional corporate performance. We believe that the variable elements of compensation are a sufficient percentage of overall compensation to motivate executives to produce positive short- and long-term corporate results, while the fixed element is also sufficiently highsufficient such that executives are not encouraged to take unnecessary or excessive risks.

 

Executives receive a significant portion of their compensation in the form of equity, and long-term cash incentive awards, which discourages them from making short-term decisions that may result in long-term harm to the organization.

 

39


All of the RSUs and long-term cash incentives awarded to Mr. Edwards, and theThe majority of the RSUs and long-term cash incentives awarded to our other named executive officers,NEOs are performance-vesting rather than time-vesting. The performance-vestingperformance-based RSUs and performance-vesting long-term cash incentives cliff vest afterover a three-year performance period from the date of grant, encouraging executives to focus onlook to long-term financial results and long-term appreciation in equity values. Likewise, time-vesting RSUs and long-term cash incentive awards vest over2-year and3-year periods from the date of grant.

Our Compensation Committee retains the discretion to decrease the value of performance-vesting equity or cash incentive awards received by executive officers, and historically has regularly exercised negative discretion to reduce awards.

 

The financialperformance metrics used to determinein the amount eligible to vest of an executive’s annual cashshort-term incentive award, performance-vestingplan and long-term cash incentive award and performance-vesting RSUsawards are measures the Compensation Committee believes contribute to long-term stockholderrepresent key value and promotedriving indicators for our business operations over the best interests of the company.applicable performance periods. Moreover, the committee attempts to set ranges for these measures thatdesigned to encourage success without encouraging excessive risk taking to achieve short-term results. In addition, the overall maximum annual cashshort-term incentive award for each participating named executive officer other than our CEONEO in 2022 could not exceed 150% of the executive’s target award, and the overall maximum long-term incentive award for each participating NEO granted in 2022 cannot exceed 100% of the executive’s base salary, andtarget award, in each case no matter how much the company’s performance exceeds the ranges established at the time of the award.

the annual cash incentive award for Mr. Edwards for 2018 could not exceed $2,500,000 (250% of his base salary), in each case no matter how much the company’s financial performance exceeds the ranges established at the beginning of the year. Likewise, the number of performance-vesting RSUs and the value of performance-vesting long-term cash incentive awards granted in 2018 that may become eligible for vesting is capped at 133% of the grant date value, regardless of our financial performance.

 

We have strict internal controls over the measurement and calculation of the performance metrics used in determining the executives’ cashshort-term incentive awardsplan and the vesting of RSUs,long-term incentive awards, designed to prevent the metrics from being susceptible to manipulation by any employee, including our executives.

 

We maintain policiesa policy that prohibitprohibits our directors and employees (including our executive officers)NEOs from engaging in any pledging, hedging or short sale transactions related to our stock or our other securities, thereby preventing our directors, executives and other employees from insulating themselves from the effects of poor stock price performance.equity securities.

Employment Agreements

We doDuring 2022, we did not have employment agreements with any of our named executive officers.NEOs except for Bernie Wolford, Jr., our President and CEO. In connection with his hire as our President and CEO, in 2014on May 8, 2021 we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Edwards that commencedWolford, which has a term continuing until terminated by us or Mr. Wolford, or until his death or disability, in March 2014 and continued until December 31, 2016, whenaccordance with the employment agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, expiredMr. Wolford will receive an annualized base salary of at least $700,000 and will be eligible to earn a bonus with a target annual bonus opportunity equal to at least 100% of base salary, payment of which is based on the achievement of certain financial or individual performance goals and factors. Mr. Wolford is also entitled to participate in our benefit programs generally available to other senior officers and to receive reimbursement of certain expenses incurred during his employment.

If Mr. Wolford’s employment is terminated due to his death or by its terms.us due to his disability, he will be entitled to any accrued but unpaid annual bonus with respect to the preceding calendar year. If Mr. Edwards’ agreement was not extendedWolford’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” (as defined in his agreement) or renewed after it expired, and he is continuingby Mr. Wolford with “good reason” (as defined in his agreement) in accordance with his employment asagreement, he will be entitled to (i) any accrued but unpaid annual bonus with respect to the preceding calendar year, (ii) a lump-sum cash payment equal to 200% of the sum of (A) his base salary plus (B) target annual bonus and (iii) continued participation in our CEOgroup health plan for him and his eligible dependents for a period of 24 months at our expense, in each case subject to the terms and conditions of his employment agreement. No severance is payable upon termination of employment for cause or a voluntary termination by Mr. Wolford without angood reason.

Mr. Wolford’s employment agreement contains non-competition covenants restricting his ability to compete with us and non-solicitation covenants, applicable in effect.each case during the term of the employment agreement and for a period of one year thereafter, customary covenants regarding our indemnification of Mr. Wolford, and covenants concerning confidentiality, rights to inventions and non-disparagement.

40


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement with management of the company. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

 

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Paul G. Gaffney II, Chairman

Charles L. Fabrikant

Edward Grebow

Neal P. Goldman, Chair
John H. Hollowell
Ane Launy

41


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

20182022 Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation of our named executive officersNEOs for 2018,2022 using the disclosure rules required by the SEC. Mr. RothWolford was hired as our Senior Vice President—Worldwide Operations on December 1, 2016. When our previous CFO resigned, Mr. Kornblau, our then-Vice President and Treasurer, was appointed as our acting CFOCEO on December 1, 2017, andMay 7, 2021. Mr. Savarino was promoted from Vice President and Chief Accounting & Tax Officer to our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on July 1, 2018.September 20, 2021.

 

Name and Principal Position

 Year  Salary ($)  Bonus ($)  Stock
Awards ($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)
  All Other
Compensation ($)
  Total ($) 

Marc Edwards

  2018   1,000,000   1,500,000   1,669,349   1,500,000   62,734   5,732,083 

President and CEO

  2017   1,000,000   —     3,665,511   1,500,000   61,421   6,226,932 
  2016   1,000,000   —     3,357,160   1,500,000   67,043   5,924,203 

Ronald Woll

  2018   435,435   750,000   286,178   261,300   30,660   1,763,573 

Executive Vice President

and Chief Commercial

Officer

  

2017

2016

 

 

  

435,435

435,435

 

 

  

—  

—  

 

 

  

628,373

575,506

 

 

  

261,300

237,500

 

 

  

29,790

26,657

 

 

  

1,354,898

1,275,098

 

 

       

Scott L. Kornblau

  2018   424,850   —     165,646   205,000   22,274   817,770 

Senior Vice President

and CFO

  2017   252,700   —     104,726   89,100   19,093   465,619 

David L. Roland

  2018   405,600   —     190,790   202,800   28,065   827,255 

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel and

Secretary

  
2017
2016
 
 
  
405,600
390,000
 
 
  

—  

—  

 

 

  
340,372
311,727
 
 
  
156,000
156,000
 
 
  
27,849
28,191
 
 
  
929,821
885,918
 
 

Thomas M. Roth

  2018   410,000   —     155,014   205,000   27,608   797,622 

Senior Vice President—

Worldwide Operations

  2017   410,000   —     340,372   205,000   27,428   982,800 

Name and Principal Position

  Year  Salary ($)  Bonus ($)  Stock
Awards ($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)
  All Other
Compensation ($)
  Total ($) 

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

   2022   705,833   —     2,348,784   627,690   16,115   3,698,422 

President and CEO

   2021   437,837   —     7,303,326   456,438   5,865   8,203,466 

Dominic A. Savarino

   2022   434,500   —     733,994   281,820   11,289   1,461,603 

Senior Vice President
and CFO

   2021   403,063   —     1,320,235   393,500   4,945   2,121,743 
   2020   391,477   35,000   —     536,500   20,942   983,919 

David L. Roland

   2022   410,670   —     513,797   275,415   16,089   1,215,971 

Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and
Secretary

   2021   397,995   —     1,320,235   426,912   5,477   2,150,619 
   2020   405,600   46,667   —     631,741   21,780   1,105,788 
        

Notes and Narrative Disclosure to 20182022 Summary Compensation Table

Salary Column. In recognitionThe following is a discussion of Mr. Kornblau’s increased duties and responsibilities as acting CFO from December 1, 2017 until he was promoted to Senior Vice President and CFO on July 1, 2018, Mr. Kornblau received a supplemental paymentmaterial factors necessary for an understanding of $17,000 per month that he servedthe information disclosed in such capacity. Mr. Kornblau’s salary reported for 2018 and 2017 includes a supplemental salary payment of $102,000 and $17,000, respectively.the 2022 Summary Compensation Table. For a discussion of the relative mix of compensation received by our named executive officers during 2018,Mr. Wolford’s employment agreement, see “Compensation Discussion andAnalysis—Long-TermStock-Based andCash-Incentive Awards”Employment Agreements above.

Salary Column. The Salary amounts for 2021 and 2022 for all NEOs reflect a voluntary temporary 5% reduction in annual base salary in effect from August 16, 2021 through April 1, 2022.

Bonus Column. The amounts shown in the “Bonus” column for 2020 for Messrs. Savarino and Roland consist of lump sum retentioncash payments earned and paidreceived in February 2018April 2020 pursuant to the accelerated vesting of outstanding time-vesting long-term cash incentive awards granted in 2018 and 2019 based on service achieved through April 1, 2020. As a condition to the receipt and retention of the accelerated payments, each of the NEOs agreed to a clawback obligation providing that if he resigns from employment with our 2017 Retention Plan.company or if the grantee’s employment is terminated by us for “cause” (as defined in our former Incentive Compensation Plan), in either case prior to the first anniversary of the payment date, the grantee would be required to repay the entire amount of the payment, net of applicable tax withholdings.

Stock Awards Column. All amounts in the “Stock Awards” column for 2022 and 2021 reflect the grant-date fair value of RSUs (excluding any impact of assumed forfeiture rates)or restricted stock awarded in such years under our EquityStock Plan, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. No RSUs or other stock awards were granted in 2020. For a description of the rights and terms of the RSUs and restricted stock granted, in 2018, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2022 Long-Term Stock-BasedIncentive Awards and Cash-Incentive“—2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards” above.

42


The grants and awards to our named executive officers under our Equity Plan in 2018 are described in the2018Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below. In addition, the amounts shown under“Stock “Stock Awards” for 2017

and 20162022 represent the grant date fair value of RSUs granted to each of the named executive officerNEOs on April 1, 2017May 12, 2022, consisting of performance-vesting RSUs and April 1, 2016, respectively, as applicable. In each case, a targettime-vesting RSUs. The number of performance-vesting RSUs was granted to the named executive officer, determined based on a target grant date value and the VWAP. In addition, a number of time-vesting RSUs was granted to named executive officers other than Mr. Edwards, determined based on a grant date value and the VWAP.

The number of RSUs awarded to each of the named executive officersNEOs in April 2017 is set forth below:2022 were as follows:

 

                 Name                

  Target Grant Date Value of
Performance-Vesting RSUs ($)
   Performance-
Vesting RSUs
Granted (#)
   Grant Date Value of
Time-Vesting RSUs ($)
   Time-Vesting
RSUs Granted (#)
 

Marc Edwards

   3,500,000    220,681    —      —   

Ronald Woll

   360,000    22,699    240,000    15,132 

Scott L. Kornblau

   60,000    3,783    40,000    2,522 

David L. Roland

   195,000    12,295    130,000    8,197 

Thomas M. Roth

   195,000    12,295    130,000    8,197 

Name

  Target Grant Date Value of
Performance-Vesting RSUs ($)
   Performance-
Vesting RSUs
Granted (#)
   Grant Date Value of
Time-Vesting RSUs ($)
   Time-Vesting
RSUs Granted (#)
 

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

   1,567,555    274,528    781,229    117,655 

Dominic A. Savarino

   489,861    85,790    244,133    36,767 

David L. Roland

   342,903    60,053    170,894    25,737 

The number ofperformance-vesting RSUs awarded to Messrs. Edwards, Woll and Roland in April 2016 is set forth below:

                 Name                

  Target Grant Date Value of
Performance-Vesting RSUs ($)
   Performance-
Vesting RSUs
Granted (#)
   Grant Date Value of
Time-Vesting RSUs ($)
   Time-Vesting
RSUs Granted (#)
 

Marc Edwards

   3,500,000    155,857    —      —   

Ronald Woll

   360,000    16,031    240,000    10,687 

David L. Roland

   195,000    8,683    130,000    5,789 

The RSUs awarded to Mr. Edwardsthe NEOs during 2018, 2017 and 20162022 cliff vest in three years upon the attainment of the three-year financialtarget stock appreciation performance goalgoals specified in histheir respective award agreement.agreements. The time-vesting RSUs granted to named executive officersthe NEOs during 2022 vest in equal amounts annually over a three-year period. In all cases, the RSUs are subject to forfeiture if the applicable vesting conditions are not met.

For Mr. Wolford, the amount shown under “Stock Awards” for 2021 represents the grant date fair value of restricted stock granted to him on May 8, 2021, consisting of performance-vesting shares and time-vesting shares. For Messrs. Savarino and Roland, the amounts shown under “Stock Awards” for 2021 represent the grant date fair value of RSUs granted to each of them as of July 1, 2021 (and, for Mr. Savarino, RSUs granted to him on October 1, 2021), consisting of performance-vesting RSUs and time-vesting RSUs.

The number of shares of performance-vesting and time-vesting restricted stock (Mr. Wolford) and the number of RSUs (Messrs. Savarino and Roland) awarded to the NEOs in 2021 were as follows:

Name

 Target Grant Date Value of
Performance-Vesting RS/RSUs ($)
  Performance-
Vesting RS/RSUs
Granted (#)
  Grant Date Value of
Time-Vesting RS/RSUs ($)
  Time-Vesting
RS/RSUs Granted (#)
 

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

  5,358,884   777,777   1,944,442   222,222 

Dominic A. Savarino

  792,146   90,531   528,089   60,353 

David L. Roland

  792,138   90,530   528,097   60,354 

The performance-vesting restricted stock awarded to Mr. Wolford during 2021 vests upon the attainment of a target level of Total Equity Value of the company, and the performance-vesting RSUs awarded to the other thanNEOs during 2021 vest upon the attainment of the safety, financial, business development and strategic performance goals specified in their respective award agreements. The time-vesting restricted stock awarded to Mr. Edwards either cliffWolford in 2021 vests in three equal installments over a two-year period, and the time-vesting RSUs awarded to the other NEOs in 2021 vest in three years under the same performance standards applicable to the RSUs granted to Mr. Edwards or time-vest (half two years after the grant date and half three years after the grant date).equal installments over a three-year period. In all cases, the restricted stock and RSUs are subject to forfeiture if the applicable vesting conditions are not met.

Under the terms of the RSU award agreements for the performance-vesting restricted stock and RSUs awarded to Mr. Edwardseach NEO in 2018, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the maximum number of performance-vesting shares of restricted stock or RSUs that could vest regardless of how far our company exceeded the applicable performance goals, would be 153,225 RSUs, 293,506 RSUs and 207,290 RSUs, respectively, and the grant-date value of the awards of RSUs to Mr. Edwards in 2018, 2017 and 2016, assuming the highest level of performance conditions were achieved and the maximum number of RSUs would vest, would have been an estimated $2,220,230, $4,875,135 and $4,465,023, respectively. Under the terms of the RSU award agreements for the performance-vesting RSUs awarded to Mr. Woll in 2018, 2017 and 2016, the maximum number of performance-vesting RSUs that could vest regardless of how far our company exceeded the applicable performance goals would be 15,761 RSUs, 30,190 RSUs and 21,321 RSUs, respectively, and the grant-date value of the awards of performance-vesting restricted stock or RSUs to Mr. Wolleach NEO in 2018, 20172022 and 2016,2021 assuming the highest level of performance conditions were achieved and the maximum number of performance-vesting shares of restricted stock and RSUs would vest, would have been an estimated $228,377, $501,456 and $459,254, respectively. Underas set forth in the terms of the RSU award agreements for the performance-vesting RSUs awarded to Mr. Kornblau in 2018 and 2017, the maximum number of performance-vesting RSUs that could vest regardless of how far our company exceeded the applicable performance goals would be 7,479 RSUs and 5,031 RSUs, respectively, and the grant-date value of the awards of performance-vesting RSUs to Mr. Kornblau in 2018 and 2017, assuming the highest level of performance conditions were achieved and the maximum number of performance-vesting RSUs would vest, would have been an estimated $132,159 and $83,565, respectively. Under the terms of the RSU award agreements for the performance-vesting RSUs awarded to Mr. Roland in 2018, 2017 and 2016, the maximum number of performance-vesting RSUs that could vest regardless of how far our company exceeded thetable below:

  Maximum Number of Performance-Vesting
RS/RSUs that Could Vest (#)
  Grant-Date Value of Maximum Number of
Performance-Vesting RS/RSUs that Could Vest ($)
 

Name

     2022          2021          2022          2021     

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

  274,528   777,777   117,655   5,358,884 

Dominic A. Savarino

  85,790   90,531   36,767   792,146 

David L. Roland

  60,053   90,530   25,737   792,138 

43


applicable performance goals would be 10,507 RSUs, 16,352 RSUs and 11,548 RSUs, respectively, and the grant-date value of the awards of performance-vesting RSUs to Mr. Roland in 2018, 2017 and 2016, assuming the highest level of performance conditions were achieved and the maximum number of performance-vesting RSUs would vest, would have been an estimated $152,246, $271,607 and $248,744, respectively. Under the terms of the RSU award agreements for the performance-vesting RSUs awarded to Mr. Roth in 2018 and 2017, the maximum number of performance-vesting RSUs that could vest regardless of how far our company exceeded the applicable performance goals would be 8,537 RSUs and 16,352 RSUs, respectively, and the grant-date value of the awards of performance-vesting RSUs to Mr. Roth in 2018 and 2017, assuming the highest level of performance conditions were achieved and the maximum number of performance-vesting RSUs would vest, would have been an estimated $123,701 and $271,607, respectively.

For a discussion of the valuation assumptions for the restricted stock and RSU awards, see Note 5,7, Stock-Based Compensation, to our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182022 included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, which has been filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019.SEC.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Column.Column. All amounts in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column for 2022 consist of payments of annual cash incentive awards reported for 2018 were made in February 2019 with regard to the 2018 fiscal year and were earned and paid pursuant to our 2022 Incentive Compensation Plan.

See For a description of 2022 Incentive Plan amounts paid to our NEOs for 2022, see Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Stock-Based2022 Short-Term Incentive Program” above.

All amounts in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column for 2021 consist of (a) payments of annual cash incentive awards earned and Cash-Incentive Awards”paid pursuant to our 2021 short-term incentive program and (b) quarterly cash payments awarded and earned during 2021 under a key employee incentive plan (or KEIP) that was in effect during our Chapter 11 reorganization and provided quarterly performance-based incentive opportunities for a descriptionthe period from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021 to certain executive-level employees, including Messrs. Savarino and Roland.

All amounts in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column for 2020 consist of (a) quarterly cash payments awarded and earned during 2020 under the KEIP and (b) cash payments received in April 2020 pursuant to the accelerated vesting of outstanding performance-vesting long-term cash incentive awards granted in 2018 and 2019 under our former Incentive Compensation Plan based on service and actual company performance achieved through April 1, 2020. The amounts received for the accelerated vesting of 2018 and 2019 performance-vesting long-term cash incentive awards were as follows:

Name

Accelerated
Performance-Vesting
Cash Incentive
Payment ($)

Dominic A. Savarino

85,000

David L. Roland

113,333

As a condition to named executive officersthe receipt and retention of the accelerated payments, each of the above NEOs agreed to a clawback obligation providing that if he resigns from employment with our company or if the grantee’s employment is terminated by us for “cause” (as defined in 2018.our former Incentive Compensation Plan), in either case prior to the first anniversary of the payment date, the grantee would be required to repay the entire amount of the payment, net of applicable tax withholdings.

The amounts received for quarterly cash payments awarded and earned under the KEIP for 2020, including an award payment made in February 2021 for the fourth calendar quarter of 2020, were as follows:

Name

2020 Cash Payments
Awarded and
Earned under
KEIP ($)

Dominic A. Savarino

451,500

David L. Roland

518,408

44


All Other Compensation Column.Column. The amounts shown in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2022 consist of the following:

20182022 All Other Compensation Table

 

Name

    Retirement
Plan
Matching
($)
     Insurance
($)
     SERP ($)     Anti-Dilution
Adjustment
for Special
Dividends ($)
     Total ($) 

Marc Edwards

     13,750      7,886      41,098      —        62,734 

Ronald Woll

     13,750      7,886      8,649      375      30,660 

Scott L. Kornblau

     13,750      5,288      2,394      842      22,274 

David L. Roland

     13,750      6,861      7,079      375      28,065 

Thomas M. Roth

     13,750      6,922      6,936      —        27,608 

Name

  Retirement Plan
Matching ($)
   Insurance ($)   SERP ($)   Total ($) 

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

   10,250    5,865    —      16,115 

Dominic A. Savarino

   5,804    5,325    160    11,289 

David L. Roland

   10,250    5,248    591    16,089 

We suspended our employee Retirement Plan contribution matching program from November 2020 through January 1, 2022 in order to reduce costs. When we resumed the company match, we matched 50% of the first 6% of each participant’s compensation contributed. Effective on January 1, 2023, we increased the company match to 100% of the first 4% of each participant’s compensation contributed.

Under our SERP, in past years we contributehave contributed to participants any portion of the applicable percentage of the base salary contribution and the matching contribution that cannot be contributed under the Retirement Plan because of the limitations within the Code. As a result of our chapter 11 reorganization, in 2021 we discontinued making SERP contributions to participants through the end of 2022. Participants in this planthe SERP are fully vested in all amounts paid into the plan. The following table summarizes 20182022 nonqualified deferred compensation of our named executive officersNEOs under our SERP.

20182022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

Name

  Registrant
Contributions in
2018 ($)(1)
   Aggregate
Earnings in

2018 ($)(2)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
in 2018 ($)(3)
   Aggregate
Balance at
December 31,
2018 ($)(4)
 

Marc Edwards

   36,250    4,848    —      233,612 

Ronald Woll

   8,022    627    375    33,911 

Scott L. Kornblau

   2,393    1    842    2,394 

David L. Roland

   6,530    549    375    29,419 

Thomas M. Roth

   6,750    186    —      13,956 

Name

  Registrant
Contributions
in 2022 ($)
   Aggregate
Earnings in
2022 ($)(1)
   Aggregate Balance
at December 31,
2022 ($)(2)
 

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

   —      —      —   

Dominic A. Savarino

   —      160    10,361 

David L. Roland

   —      591    38,238 

 

(1)

These amounts include our contributions under our SERP. Our contributions under this plan are further described in our“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above under the heading“Personal Benefits, Perquisites and Employee Benefits.” These contributions are also reported in the“All Other Compensation” column of the2018 Summary Compensation Table and in the“SERP” column of the2018All Other Compensation Table.

(2)

These amounts represent interest earned on contributions under our SERP. These amounts are also reportedincluded in theAll Other Compensation”Compensation column of the20182022 Summary Compensation Table and in theSERP”SERP column of the20182022 All Other Compensation Table. These earnings were calculated by applying a fixed interest rate based on the annual yield on10-year U.S. Treasury Securities to current year and deferred contributions.

(3)

These amounts represent payments made in 2018 for accrued anti-dilution adjustments after awards of SARs vested in 2018.

(4)(2)

These amounts represent the aggregate balancesbalance as of December 31, 20182022 for each of the named executive officersNEOs pursuant to our SERP and either a dividends equivalent or the amount payable pursuant to anti-dilution adjustments under the terms of our Equity Plan.SERP. The deferred balances related to our SERP were reported in the Summary Compensation Table in each contribution year.

45


2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Name and Type of Equity
Award (1)

 Grant Date  Action
Date
  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards ($)(2)
  Estimated
Future
Payouts
Under
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards
(#)(3)
  All Other
Stock Awards
(#)(4)
  Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock Awards
($)(5)
 
 Threshold  Target  Maximum  Target 

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

    367,500   735,000   1,102,500    

RSUs (T)

  05/12/22   04/21/22       117,655   781,229 

RSUs (P)

  05/12/22   04/21/22      274,528    1,567,555 

Dominic A. Savarino

    165,000   330,000   495,000    

RSUs (T)

  05/12/22   04/21/22       36,767   244,133 

RSUs (P)

  05/12/22   04/21/22      85,790    489,861 

David L. Roland

    150,500   301,000   451,500    

RSUs (T)

  05/12/22   04/21/22       25,737   170,894 

RSUs (P)

  05/12/22   04/21/22      60,053    342,903 

(1)

Restricted stock and RSUs are either time-vesting (T) or performance-vesting (P).

(2)

These amounts represent the threshold, target and maximum awards allowable under our 2022 Incentive Plan. Awards under our 2022 Incentive Plan cannot exceed 150% of the target incentive amount, regardless of level of company performance. See the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table above and the related notes and narrative disclosure. For more information concerning awards under our 2022 Incentive Plan and the actual incentive amounts paid for 2022, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2022 Short-Term Incentive Program.

(3)

The deferred balances relatedamounts shown represent target awards of performance-vesting RSUs that could vest as determined pursuant to our Stock Plan and the applicable award agreement. RSUs awarded to the NEOs in 2022 will cliff vest upon the achievement of a target stock appreciation performance goal over a three-year period. In all cases, the RSUs are subject to forfeiture if the applicable vesting conditions are not met. None of the NEOs have any privileges of a stockholder of the company with respect to any RSUs, including any right to vote any shares underlying the RSUs or to receive dividends or other distributions; provided that, if the company declares any dividend while the RSUs are outstanding, the holder will be credited a dividend equivalent, which will be subject to the same vesting conditions applicable to the RSU and will vest only if the RSU vests and will be forfeited if the RSU is forfeited. Any such dividend equivalents will be settled and paid to the holder following the date on which the RSU vests. All RSUs may be settled in cash or our common stock. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2022 Long-Term Incentive Awards.

(4)

The amounts payableshown represent awards of time-vesting RSUs that could vest as determined pursuant to our Stock Plan and the anti-dilution adjustmentsapplicable award agreement. The RSUs will vest in three equal installments over a three-year period. In all cases, the RSUs are subject to forfeiture if the applicable vesting conditions are not met. None of the NEOs have any privileges of a stockholder of the company with respect to any RSUs, including any right to vote any shares underlying the RSUs or to receive dividends or other distributions; provided that, if the company declares any dividend while the RSUs are outstanding, the holder will be credited a dividend equivalent, which will be subject to the same vesting conditions applicable to the RSU and will vest only if the RSU vests and will be forfeited if the RSU is forfeited. Any such dividend equivalents will be settled and paid to the holder following the date on which the RSU vests. All RSUs may be settled in cash or our common stock. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2022 Long-Term Incentive Awards.

(5)

Represents the maximum fair value of each equity award recognizable in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (based, with respect to RSUs, upon the probable outcome of performance conditions) and does not include any estimates of forfeitures for service-based vesting. See Note 7, Stock-Based Compensation, to our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, which has been filed with the SEC.

46


Stock Plan

Our Stock Plan authorizes the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs, performance awards, and other stock-based awards or any combination thereof to eligible participants. Stock options intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” may only be granted to employees of the company or our subsidiaries. Subject to adjustment, the aggregate number of shares of company common stock that was initially available for issuance pursuant to awards under our Stock Plan is 11,111,111, of which 1,987,234 shares had been issued as of December 31, 2022 and 3,392,361 shares underlying outstanding awards of unvested restricted stock and RSUs had been reserved for issuance as of December 31, 2022. The shares issued pursuant to awards under our Stock Plan will be made available from shares currently authorized but unissued or shares currently held (or subsequently acquired) by the company as treasury shares, including shares purchased in the open market or in private transactions. During 2022, a total of 1,254,799 RSUs were granted under our Stock Plan. During 2022, no shares of restricted stock were granted under our Stock Plan.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2022, categorized by (i) equity compensation plans previously approved by our stockholders and (ii) equity compensation plans not previously approved by our stockholders.

Plan Category

  Number of securities to be
Issued upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights (1)
(a)
   Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights ($)(2)
(b)
   Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
(c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders

   —      —      —   

Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders (3)

   3,392,361    —      5,731,516 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   3,392,361    —      5,731,516 

(1)

As of December 31, 2022, only RSUs and shares of restricted stock were outstanding under our Stock Plan. The number of shares included with respect to RSUs includes the shares of our common stock that would be issued under these awards outstanding at December 31, 2022 if the maximum level of performance is achieved under the termsawards. If actual performance falls below the maximum level of performance for these awards, fewer shares would be issued.

(2)

The weighted-average exercise price does not consider RSUs and shares of restricted stock because neither RSUs nor restricted stock has an exercise price.

(3)

Our Stock Plan was approved by the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to our Joint Plan. See “Election of Directors—Overview of Changes to our Board of Directors and Corporate Governance Structure since 2021.”

47


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2022

   Stock Awards (1) 

Name

  Shares or Units
of Stock that
Have Not Vested
(#)(2)
   Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock that Have
not Vested ($)(2)
   Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares, Units
or Other Rights That
Have Not Vested (#)(2)
   Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or Payout
Value of Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights That
Have Not Vested ($)(2)
 

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

   191,729    1,993,982    304,898    3,170,939 

Dominic A. Savarino

   77,001    800,810    149,763    1,557,535 

David L. Roland

   65,973    686,119    124,026    1,289,870 

(1)

The amounts shown for Mr. Wolford represent shares of restricted stock and RSUs granted under our Stock Plan, and the amounts shown for Messrs. Savarino and Roland represent RSUs granted under our Stock Plan. Mr. Wolford receives all privileges of a stockholder of the company with respect to his shares of restricted stock, including the right to vote any shares underlying the restricted stock and to receive dividends or other distributions. All RSUs may be settled in cash or our common stock.

(2)

The market value of each executive’s unvested shares of restricted stock and RSUs was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares or RSUs by $10.40 (the closing price per share of our Equitycommon stock on December 30, 2022, as reported on the NYSE). In April 2021, Mr. Wolford was awarded 222,222 shares of restricted stock that vest in equal installments on May 8, 2021, May 8, 2022 and May 8, 2023, and 777,777 shares of restricted stock that vest upon the attainment of a target level of total company equity value as specified in Mr. Wolford’s award agreement or may vest in certain circumstances in connection with a change in control (of which 30,370 shares of performance-vesting restricted stock remained unvested as of December 31, 2022). In July 2021, Messrs. Savarino and Roland were awarded RSUs that vest with respect to up to approximately 1/3 of the RSUs on each of June 30, 2022, June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2024 upon the attainment of the safety, financial, business development and strategic performance goals specified in the respective award agreements or vest in three equal installments over a three-year period on each of July 1, 2022, July 1, 2023 and July 1, 2024. In October 2021, Mr. Savarino was awarded additional RSUs with the same vesting terms as the July 2021 RSUs. In May 2022, Messrs. Wolford, Savarino and Roland were awarded RSUs that cliff vest upon the achievement of a target stock appreciation performance goal over a three-year period through May 12, 2025 or vest in three equal installments over a three-year period on each of May 12, 2023, May 12, 2024 and May 12, 2025. The number of performance-vesting shares of restricted stock and RSUs shown in the above table is based on the target amount of each award. All of the outstanding shares of restricted stock and RSUs are subject to forfeiture if the applicable vesting conditions are not met. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards” and “—2022 Long-Term Incentive Awards” above.

2022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

   Restricted Stock and RSU Awards (1) 

Name

  Number of Shares
Acquired
on Vesting (#)
   Value Realized
on Vesting ($)
 

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

   821,481   6,809,266 

Dominic A. Savarino

   46,677    315,867 

David L. Roland

   46,675    315,854 

(1)

On May 8, 2022, 74,074 shares of time-vesting restricted stock granted to Mr. Wolford vested. On July 1, 2022, 20,119 time-vesting RSUs granted to Mr. Savarino vested, and 20,118 time-vesting RSUs granted to Mr. Roland vested. On August 12, 2022, 493,847 shares of performance-vesting restricted stock granted to Mr. Wolford vested, 26,558 performance-vesting RSUs granted to Mr. Savarino vested and 26,557 performance-vesting RSUs granted to Mr. Roland vested. On December 30, 2022, 253,560 shares of performance-vesting restricted stock granted to Mr. Wolford vested. The values realized upon vesting of shares of restricted stock and RSU awards contained in the table are based on the market value of our common stock on the date of vesting.

48


2022 Pay Versus Performance
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
we
ar
e providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and certain measurements of our compan
y
’s financial performance.
                    
Value of Initial Fixed

$100 Investment Based on:
       
Year
 
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO ($)(1)
(Bernie
Wolford, Jr.)
  
Compensation
Actually Paid to
PEO ($)(2)
(Bernie
Wolford, Jr.)
  
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO ($)(3)
(Marc Edwards)
  
Compensation
Actually Paid to
PEO ($)(4)
(Marc Edwards)
  
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)(5)
  
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO
NEOs
($)(6)
  
Total
Shareholder
Return($)(7)
  
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return($)(7)
  
Net Income
(Loss)

(millions)($)(8)
  
Adjusted
EBITDA

(millions)
($)(9)
 
2022  3,698,422   12,598,202   —     —     1,338,787   2,452,251   138.67   108.19   (103  35 
2021  8,203,466   1,926,806   9,099,682   9,099,682   2,617,028   1,570,805   —     —     (2,139  (323
2020  —     —     7,077,198   4,309,224   1,471,624   1,167,621   —     —     (1,255  (823
(1)
During 2022, our CEO was Bernie Wolford, Jr.
Mr. Wolford
was appointed as our President and CEO on May 7, 2021.
(2)The adjustments for calculating Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. Wolford are as follows:
Adjustments to Determine Compensation Actually Paid to Bernie Wolford, Jr.
  
2022
  
2021
  
2020
 
Summary Compensation Table (or SCT) Total for PEO
   3,698,422   8,203,466   —   
Deduction for Amounts Reported under the Stock Awards Column in our SCT
   (2,348,784  (7,303,326  
  
 
Increase for Fair Value as of
Year-end
of Awards Granted during the Year that Remain Unvested as of Year- end
   4,037,524   684,444   
  
 
Increase for Fair Value as of the Vesting Date of Awards Granted during the Year that Vest during the Year
   —     342,222   
  
 
Increase/deduction for Change in Fair Value from prior
Year-end
to current
Year-end
of Awards Granted Prior to the Year that were Outstanding and Unvested as of
Year-end
   743,996   —     
  
 
Increase/deduction for Change in Fair Value from prior
Year-end
to Vesting Date of Awards Granted Prior to the Year that Vested during the Year
   6,467,045   —     
  
 
Total Adjustments
   8,899,780   (6,276,660  
  
 
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO
   12,598,202   1,926,806   —   
(3)During 2020 and until his resignation on April 23, 2021, our CEO was Marc Edwards.
(4)
The adjustments for calculating Compensation Actually Paid t
o
Mr. Edwards are as follows:
Adjustments to Determine Compensation Actually Paid to Marc Edwards
  
2022
   
2021
   
2020
 
SCT Total for PEO
  —    
9,099,682
  7,077,198

 
Increase/deduction for Change in Fair Value from prior
Year-end
to Vesting Date of Awards Granted Prior to the Year that Vested during the Year
  
  
    
  
   
(748,109
)
 
Deduction of Fair Value of Awards Granted Prior to the Year that were Forfeited during the Year
  
  
    
  
   
(2,019,865
)
 
Total Adjustments
  
  
    
  
   
(2,767,974
)
 
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO
  
   
9,099,682
  
4,309,224
  
(5)
During 2022, our
non-PEO
NEOs were
Dominic A. Savarino
and
David L. Roland
. During 2020 and 2021, our
non-PEO
NEOs were Mr. Savarino, Mr. Roland, Ronald Woll and Scott L. Kornblau.
49

(6)
The adjustments for calculating Average Compensation Actually Paid to the
non-PEO
NEOs are as follows:
Adjustments to Determine Average Compensation Actually Paid to
Non-PEO
NEOs
  
2022
  
2021
  
2020
 
Average SCT Total for Non-PEO NEOs
   1,338,787   2,617,028   1,471,624 
Deduction for Amounts Reported under the Stock Awards Column in the SCT   (1,247,791  (5,579,061  
  
 
Increase for Fair Value as of
Year-end
of Awards Granted during the Year that Remain Unvested as of Year- end
   
2,144,932
 
 
 
1,394,168
 
 
   
Increase/deduction for Change in Fair Value from prior
Year-end
to current
Year-end
of Awards Granted Prior to the Year that were Outstanding and Unvested as of
Year-end
   
1,162,803
 
 
 
—  
 
 
 
—  
 
Increase/deduction for Change in Fair Value from prior
Year-end
to Vesting Date of Awards Granted Prior to the Year that Vested during the Year
   
166,984
 
 
 
—  
 
 
 
(257,297
Deduction of Fair Value of Awards Granted Prior to the Year that were Forfeited during the Year   
—  
 
 
 
—  
 
 
 
(958,715
Total Adjustments
   
2,226,928
 
 
 
(4,184,893
 
 
(1,216,012
Number of Non-PEO NEOs
 
 
2
 
 
 
4
 
 
 
4
 
Average Adjustment per Non-PEO NEO


1,113,464
 
 
 
(1,046,223
 
 
(304,003
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs
   2,452,251   1,570,805   1,167,621 
(7)The calculation is based on a fixed investment of $100 from the beginning of the measurement period, assuming reinvestment of dividends. In the above table, we used the Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services Index for our Peer Group Total Shareholder Return. Prior to filing for Chapter 11 reorganization on April 26, 2020, our common stock traded on the NYSE. As a result of our Chapter 11 filing, the NYSE removed our common stock from trading on April 27, 2020, and then delisted our common stock. Upon our emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization on April 23, 2021, our common stock outstanding immediately before our emergence was canceled and our new post-emergence common stock was not registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. We relisted our new post-emergence common stock on the NYSE effective March 30, 2022. As a result, our Total Shareholder Return and Peer Group Total Shareholder Return for 2022 in the above table is limited to the period from March 30, 2022 through December 31, 2022 and we cannot report a Total Shareholder Return for 2021 or 2020. To ensure a consistent comparison, we also limited the Peer Group Total Shareholder Return for 2022 in the above table to the period from March 30, 2022 through December 31, 2022 and we did not report a Peer Group Total Shareholder Return for 2021 or 2020.
(8)
We emerged from our Chapter 11 reorganization on April 23, 2021. Upon emergence from bankruptcy, we met the criteria for and were required to adopt fresh start accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 852,
Reorganizations
, which on our emergence date resulted in a new entity for financial reporting purposes, with no beginning retained earnings or deficit as of the fresh start reporting date. Fresh start accounting requires that new fair values be established for our assets, liabilities and equity as of the emergence date. The emergence date fair values of our assets and liabilities differ materially from their recorded values as reflected on our historical balance sheets prior to the emergence. In addition, as a result of the application of fresh start accounting and the effects of the implementation of our
Joint Plan, were
 the financial statements for the period after April 23, 2021 are not comparable with the financial statements prior to and including April 23, 2021. References to “Successor” in these footnotes refer to our company and its financial position and results of operations from April 24, 2021 to December 31, 2021, and the year ended December 31, 2022, and references to “Predecessor” refer to our company and its financial position and results of operations from January 1, 2021 to April 23, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2020. See Note 3 “Fresh Start Accounting” to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2021. The Predecessor’s Net Income (Loss) in 2021 was $(1,961,989,000), and the Successor’s Net Income (Loss) in 2021 was $(177,344,000). For purposes of reporting Net Income (Loss) for 2021 in the above table, we have combined the Net Loss of the Predecessor in 2021 with the Net Loss of the Successor in 2021.
(9)See Footnote (8) above regarding adoption of fresh start accounting after our emergence from our Chapter 11 reorganization on April 23, 2021. The Predecessor’s adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (or Adjusted EBITDA) in 2021 was $(239,787,000), and the Successor’s Adjusted EBITDA in 2021 was $(83,700,000). For purposes of reporting Adjusted EBITDA for 2021 in the above table, we have combined the Adjusted EBITDA of the Predecessor in 2021 with the Adjusted EBITDA of the Successor in 2021. Adjusted EBITDA is a financial measure that does not conform with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (or GAAP). We
50

believe that this
non-GAAP
financial measure provides meaningful information about our performance by excluding certain items that may not be indicative of our ongoing operating results. This allows investors and others to better compare our financial results across previous and subsequent accounting periods and to those of peer companies and to better understand our long-term performance. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered a supplement to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, contract drilling revenue, contract drilling expense, operating income or loss, cash flows from operations or other measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following table summarizes how Adjusted EBITDA is calculated from Loss Before Income Tax Benefit (Expense) as reported in the“All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table and in the“Anti-Dilution Adjustmentour audited financial statements.
Reconciliation of Loss Before Income Tax Benefit (Expense) to Adjusted EBITDA
(in thousands)
 
   
Successor
  
Successor
  
Predecessor
  
Combined
  
Predecessor
 
   Year Ended
12/31/2022
  Period
04/24/2021
through
12/31/2021
  Period
01/01/2021
through
04/23/2021
  Year Ended
12/31/2021
  Year Ended
12/31/2020
 
As reported Loss Before Income Tax (Expense) Benefit
   
(105,606
)
 
  
(175,690
)
 
  
(2,001,393
)
 
  
(2,177,083
)
 
  
(1,276,090
)
 
Interest expense   40,423   26,180   34,827   61,007   42,585 
Interest income   (18  (3  (30  (33  (484
Foreign currency transaction gain   3,023   997   172   1,169   4,498 
Depreciation   103,478   68,504   92,758   161,262   320,085 
Gain on disposition of assets   (4,895  (1,024  (5,486  (6,510  (7,375
Other, net   (1,267  (10,752  (398  (11,150  (560
Restructuring and separation costs   —     —     —     —     17,724 
Reorganization costs   —     8,088   1,639,763   1,647,851   76,910 
Adjusted EBITDA
   
35,138
   
(83,700
)
 
  
(239,787
)
 
  
(323,487
)
 
  
(822,707
)
 
The following three graphs use the information provided in the table above to describe the relationship between:
(i) the compensation actually paid to our PEO and the average compensation actually paid to our
non-PEO
NEOs for each year indicated and (ii) our cumulative total shareholder return (or TSR) and the cumulative TSR of our peer group;
(i) the compensation actually paid to our PEO and the average compensation actually paid to our
non-PEO
NEOs for each year indicated and (ii) our Net Income (Loss); and
(i) the compensation actually paid to our PEO and the average compensation actually paid to our
non-PEO
NEOs for each year indicated and (ii) our Adjusted EBITDA.
51

For
purposes of the Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO for 2021 in the below graphs, we have aggregated the Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. Wolford and Mr. Edwards for 2021 provided in the table above, which includes the $6.0 million severance payment to Mr. Edwards upon his termination of employment in April
2021.
Most Important Financial Performance Measures for Special Dividends” column of the All Other Compensation Table in the year in which such anti-dilution adjustments were made, irrespective of when they are paid.

Our NEOs
Adjusted EBITDA
Relative Total Shareholder Return
Stock Price Appreciation
52


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Under the terms of our compensation and severance plans and award agreements, our named executive officersNEOs are entitled to certain payments and benefits upon the occurrence of specified events, including termination of employment. The following summariessummary and tables describe the specific terms of these arrangements and the estimated potential payments payable to each of our named executive officersMessrs. Wolford, Savarino and Roland upon termination of employment under our stock plans and other compensation programs as if his employment had terminated for these reasons on December 31, 2018. We do not currently have any plans, programs or agreements under which the named executive officers would be entitled to receive either a severance payment or a payment triggered by a change in control of our company. For purposes of the following summaries, dollar amounts are estimates based on annual base salary as of December 31, 2018, benefits paid to the named executive officer in fiscal year 2018 and RSU and cash incentive holdings of the named executive officer as of December 31, 2018. The actual amounts to be paid to the named executive officers can only be determined at the time of each executive’s separation from the company.

In addition to the amounts in the below summaries, if the named executive officer resigns or his employment is terminated for any reason, he may be paid for his unused vacation days. The summaries assume that there is no earned but unpaid base salary or unpaid business expense reimbursements as of the time of termination.2022.

The amounts of potential future payments and benefits as set forth in the tables below, and the descriptions of the assumptions upon which such future payments and benefits are based and derived, may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are estimates of payments and benefits to certain of our executives upon their termination of employment, and actual payments and benefits may vary materially from these estimates.

Actual amounts can only be determined at the time of such executive’s actual separation from our company. Factors that could affect these amounts and assumptions include, among others, the timing during the year of any such event, our company’s stock price, unforeseen future changes in our company’s benefits and compensation methodology, the age of the executive and the circumstances of the executive’s termination of employment.

Marc EdwardsFor purposes of the following tables, with respect to each NEO, dollar amounts are estimates based on annual base salary as of December 31, 2022 and benefits paid to the NEO in fiscal year 2022. The market value of each executive’s accelerated shares of restricted stock and RSUs shown in the below tables was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares or RSUs by $10.40 (the closing price per share of our common stock on December 30, 2022, as reported on the NYSE). See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards” and “—2022 Long-Term Incentive Awards” above. The actual amounts to be paid to the NEOs can only be determined at the time of each executive’s separation from the company.

In April 2016, addition to the amounts in the below summaries, if the NEO resigns or his employment is terminated for any reason, he may be paid for his unused vacation days. The summaries assume that there is no earned but unpaid base salary or unpaid business expense reimbursements as of the time of termination.

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

Mr. Edwards was awardedWolford’s employment agreement provides that, if Mr. Wolford’s employment is terminated (a) due to his death or by us due to his disability, he will be entitled to any accrued but unpaid annual bonus with respect to the preceding calendar year and (b) by us without “cause” (as defined in his agreement) or by Mr. Wolford with “good reason” (as defined in his agreement), he will be entitled to (i) any accrued but unpaid annual bonus with respect to the preceding calendar year, (ii) a lump-sum cash payment equal to 200% of the sum of (A) his base salary plus (B) target annual bonus and (iii) continued participation in our group health plan for him and his eligible dependents for a period of 24 months at our expense. No severance is payable upon termination of employment for cause or a voluntary termination by Mr. Wolford without good reason.

Mr. Wolford’s restricted stock award agreement for his CEO Time-Vesting Award provides that, if his employment is terminated by us without “cause” (as defined in our Stock Plan), due to his death or disability, or by him for “good reason” (as defined in our Stock Plan), then the number of 155,857 RSUsshares of restricted stock that were scheduledwould have otherwise vested pursuant to cliffthe award in the 12-month period following such termination will immediately vest on the date of such termination. However, in the case of any such termination within the period starting six months prior to the occurrence of a “change in control” (as defined in our Stock Plan) and ending 12 months following the occurrence of a change in control, then the restricted stock will fully vest immediately upon such termination of employment. If the CEO Time-Vesting Award is not continued, assumed, replaced, converted or substituted upon the occurrence of a change in control in accordance with our Stock Plan, then the restricted stock will fully vest as of immediately prior to a change in control.

53


Mr. Wolford’s restricted stock award agreement for his CEO Performance-Vesting Award provides that, if his employment is terminated by us without cause, due to his death or disability, or by him for good reason, then the restricted stock will remain outstanding and be eligible to vest during the 12-month period following such termination of employment. However, in the case of any such termination within the period starting six months prior to the occurrence of a change in control and ending 12 months following the occurrence of a change in control, then the restricted stock will fully vest immediately upon such termination of employment. Upon the occurrence of a change in control in accordance with our Stock Plan, the Total Equity Value would be tested on the change in control and the restricted stock would vest in three yearsaccordance with the terms of our Stock Plan.

To determine the Total Equity Value of our common stock as of December 31, 2022 for purposes of estimating the extent to which Mr. Wolford’s remaining unvested CEO Performance-Vesting Award may have vested under the terms of his award agreement if his employment had been terminated by us without cause, due to his death or disability, or by him for good reason as of such date, we multiplied $10.40 (the closing price per share of our common stock on December 30, 2022, as reported on the NYSE) by our estimated shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2022. The above calculation would result in an estimated Total Equity Value of approximately $980.4 million as of December 31, 2022, which would not exceed the Total Equity Value achieved in the prior vesting of his CEO Performance-Vesting Award and therefore would not have resulted in any additional shares of Mr. Wolford’s remaining unvested CEO Performance-Vesting Award vesting under the terms of his award agreement.

In estimating the extent to which Mr. Wolford’s remaining unvested CEO Performance-Vesting Award may have vested under the terms of his award agreement if his employment had been terminated on December 31, 2022 after a change in control, we estimated that the Total Equity Value would have satisfied target and all of his remaining CEO Performance-Vesting Award would have vested in full.

In estimating the extent to which the unvested performance-based RSUs granted to Mr. Wolford on May 12, 2022 may have vested under the terms of his award agreement if his employment had been terminated on December 31, 2022 without “cause” or as a result of his death or disability or a resignation for “good reason,” we assumed that the highest 30-day VWAP achieved during the performance period prior to his termination was $10.40 (the closing price per share of our common stock on December 30, 2022, as reported on the NYSE) and used straight-line interpolation to determine that 88.13% of his performance-based RSUs would vest. In estimating the extent to which Mr. Wolford’s unvested time-based and performance-based RSUs may have vested under the terms of his award agreements if his employment had been terminated on December 31, 2022 after a change in control, we estimated that both of his awards would have been treated as “Rollover Awards” in the change in control and therefore all of his remaining unvested time-based and performance-based RSUs would have vested in full. For a description of the terms of Mr. Wolford’s time-based RSU award and performance-based RSU award granted on May 12, 2022, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2022 Long-Term Incentive Awards” above.

Mr. Wolford’s employment agreement contains non-competition covenants restricting his ability to compete with us and non-solicitation covenants, applicable in each case during the term of the employment agreement and for a period of one year thereafter, and covenants concerning confidentiality, rights to inventions and non-disparagement.

Other NEOs

Messrs. Savarino and Roland are participants in the Supplemental Severance Plan, which provides that if a participant’s employment is terminated by our company without “cause” or as a result of the recipient’s death or disability or a resignation for “good reason” (each of “cause” and “good reason” as defined in the Supplemental Severance Plan), the participant will be eligible to receive a lump-sum cash payment in an amount equal to the sum of the participant’s annual base salary and annual target bonus and, subject to the participant’s election of continuation of health care coverage pursuant to COBRA, we will pay the full cost of the

54


participant’s COBRA premiums for 12 months from the date of the termination. If a participant’s employment is terminated by our levelcompany without cause or due to a resignation for good reason within six months prior to, or one year following, a change in control of achievement towardsour company, the participant will instead be eligible to receive a specifiedlump-sum cash payment in an amount equal to 1.5 times the sum of the participant’s annual base salary and annual target bonus and, subject to the participant’s election of COBRA coverage, we will pay the full cost of the participant’s COBRA premiums for 18 months from the date of such termination. To be eligible to receive severance benefits under the Supplemental Severance Plan, a participant must enter into an agreement with us that contains restrictive covenants with respect to confidentiality and non-solicitation of customers (for three months after termination) and employees (for six months after termination).

In estimating the extent to which the remaining unvested performance-based RSUs granted to Mr. Savarino on July 1, 2021 and October 1, 2021, and granted to Mr. Roland on July 1, 2021, may have vested under the terms of their award agreements if their employment had been terminated on December 31, 2022 without “cause” or as a result of their death or disability or a resignation for “good reason,” we estimated that the performance target for each of 2016, 2017 and 2018. As an additional conditionconditions applicable to the vesting of the RSUs awarded to him in 2016, Mr. Edwards was required to remain our employee through the vesting date (which occurred on February 7, 2019), except as follows:

Upon Mr. Edwards’ termination without “Cause” or for “Good Reason” on or after April 1, 2018, heawards would have received 50%been achieved at target and therefore their remaining eligible performance-based RSUs would have vested at target. In estimating the extent to which the unvested performance-based RSUs granted to Messrs. Savarino and Roland on May 12, 2022 may have vested under the terms of histheir award agreements if their employment had been terminated on December 31, 2022 without “cause” or as a result of their death or disability or a resignation for “good reason,” we assumed that the highest 30-day VWAP achieved during the performance period prior to their termination was $10.40 (the closing price per share of our common stock on December 30, 2022, as reported on the NYSE) and used straight-line interpolation to determine that 88.13% of their performance-based RSUs would vest. In estimating the extent to which the remaining unvested time-based and performance-based RSUs held by Messrs. Savarino and Roland may have vested under the terms of their award agreements if their employment had been terminated on December 31, 2022 after a change in control, we estimated that eventually vest upon attainmentall of their RSU awards would have been treated as “Rollover Awards” in the change in control and therefore all of their remaining unvested time-based and performance-based RSUs would have vested in full. For a description of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period; and

Upon termination of Mr. Edwards’ employment for any other reason (other than for “Cause”), including voluntary resignation, on or after April 1, 2018, he would have received 20% of his RSUs that eventually vest upon attainmentterms of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period.

In April 2017, Mr. Edwards was awarded a target number of 220,681 RSUs that cliff vest in three years subject to our level of achievement towards a specified performance target for each of 2017, 2018time-based RSU awards and 2019. As an additional condition to the vesting of the RSUs awarded to him in 2017, Mr. Edwards is required to remain our employee through the vesting date, except as follows:

Upon Mr. Edwards’ termination without “Cause” or for “Good Reason” on or after April 1, 2019, he will receive 50% of his RSUs that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period; and

Upon termination of Mr. Edwards’ employment for any other reason (other than for “Cause”), including voluntary resignation, on or after April 1, 2019, he will receive 20% of his RSUs that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period.

In April 2018, Mr. Edwards was awarded a target number of 115,207 RSUs and a long-term cash incentive award with a target value of $1,750,000, each of whichperformance-based RSU awards cliff vest in three years subject to our level of achievement towards a specified performance target for each of 2018, 2019 and 2020. As an additional condition to the vesting of the RSUs and long-term cash incentive award granted to him in 2018,Messrs. Savarino and Roland on July 1, 2021 and May 12, 2022, and the time-based RSU awards and performance-based RSU awards granted to Mr. Edwards is required to remain our employee throughSavarino on October 1, 2021, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards” and “—2022 Long-Term Incentive Awards” above.

Assuming the vesting date, except as follows:

Upon Mr. Edwards’ termination without “Cause” or for “Good Reason” on or after April 1, 2020, he will receive 50%employment of his RSUs and long-term cash incentive award that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period; and

Upon termination of Mr. Edwards’ employment for any other reason (other than for “Cause”), including voluntary resignation, on or after April 1, 2020, he will receive 20% of his RSUs and long-term cash incentive award that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period.

Assuming Mr. Edwards’ employmenteach below NEO was terminated under each of these circumstances on December 31, 2018,2022, his payments and benefits would have had an estimated value as follows (less applicable withholding taxes):

 

Marc Edwards

Executive Benefits & Payments

  Termination
For Good
Reason or
Without
Cause ($)
   Termination
for Death or
Disability ($)
   Termination
for Cause ($)
   Other
Voluntary
Termination
($)(1)
 

Annual Cash Incentive (2)

   —      1,500,000    —      —   

Bernie Wolford, Jr.

Executive Benefits & Payments

  Termination for
Good Reason or
Without Cause ($)
   Termination
for Death or
Disability ($)
   Termination
for Cause ($)
   Other Voluntary
Termination ($)
   Termination
after Change
in Control ($)
 

Cash Severance

   3,675,000    735,000    —      —      3,675,000 

Accelerated Restricted Stock

   770,370    770,370    —      —      1,086,218 

Accelerated RSUs (3)

   546,850    218,734    —      218,734    2,516,192    2,516,192    —      —      4,078,703 

COBRA Insurance Continuation

   11,730    —      —      —      11,730 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   6,973,292    4,021,562    —      —      8,851,651 

Dominic A. Savarino

Executive Benefits & Payments

Dominic A. Savarino

Executive Benefits & Payments

Dominic A. Savarino

Executive Benefits & Payments

Dominic A. Savarino

Executive Benefits & Payments

  Termination for
Good Reason or
Without Cause ($)
   Termination
for Death or
Disability ($)
   Termination
for Cause ($)
   Other Voluntary
Termination ($)
   Termination
after Change
in Control ($)
 

Cash Severance

   770,000    770,000    —      —      1,155,000 

Accelerated RSUs (1)

   1,832,436    1,832,436    —      —      2,320,719 

COBRA Insurance Continuation

   5,325    5,325    —      —      7,988 

SERP

   233,612    233,612    233,612    233,612    10,361    10,361    10,361    10,361    10,361 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   780,462    1,952,346    233,612    452,346    2,618,122    2,618,122    10,361    10,361    3,494,068 

55


David L. Roland

Executive Benefits & Payments

  Termination for
Good Reason or
Without Cause ($)
   Termination
for Death or
Disability ($)
   Termination
for Cause ($)
   Other Voluntary
Termination ($)
   Termination
after Change
in Control ($)
 

Cash Severance

   731,000    731,000    —      —      1,096,500 

Accelerated RSUs (1)

   1,596,542    1,596,542    —      —      1,938,341 

COBRA Insurance Continuation

   5,248    5,248    —      —      7,872 

SERP

   38,238    38,238    38,238    38,238    38,238 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   2,371,028    2,371,028    38,238    38,238    3,080,951 

 

(1)

The above table does not include a scenarioaward agreements for the RSUs granted to Messrs. Savarino and Roland on July 1, 2021 and to Mr. Savarino on October 1, 2021 permit acceleration for termination due to retirement because, as of December 31, 2018, Mr. Edwards waswithout “cause” but do not yet retirement-eligible under our policies and plans.

(2)

The actual annual cash incentive award payment that Mr. Edwards would be entitled to receivepermit acceleration upon his termination may be different fromfor “good reason.” As a result, the estimated amount includedpayments in the above table, depending on the achievement of payment criteria under the Incentive Compensation Plan.

(3)

The value of the RSUs that would accelerate and fully vest in the event of the termination of employment without Cause or for Good Reason was calculated by multiplying 57,929 unvested RSUs by $9.44 (the closing price per share of our common stock on December 31, 2018, as reported on the NYSE). The value of the RSUs that would accelerate and fully vest in the event of death, disability or voluntary termination of employment was calculated by multiplying 23,171 unvested RSUs by $9.44. The amounts shown are based on the estimated number of RSUs that would have vested assuming achievement of the target level of performance.

Other Named Executive Officers

In April 2016, each of Messrs. Woll, Kornblau and Roland was awarded time-vesting RSUs and a target number of RSUs that were scheduled to cliff vest in three years subject to our level of achievement towards a specified performance target for each of 2016, 2017 and 2018. In April 2017, each of Messrs. Woll, Kornblau, Roland and Roth was awarded time-vesting RSUs and a target number of RSUs that cliff vest in three years subject to our level of achievement towards a specified performance target for each of 2017, 2018 and 2019. In April 2018, each of those executives was awarded time-vesting RSUs, a time-vesting long-term cash incentive award and a target number of performance-vesting RSUs and target amount under a performance-vesting long-term cash incentive award, which cliff vest in three years subject to our level of achievement towards a specified performance target for each of 2018, 2019 and 2020.

As an additional condition to the vesting of the RSUs awarded in April 2016, the respective recipient was required to remain our employee through the vesting date (which occurred on February 7, 2019), except as follows:

Upon termination without “Cause” on or after April 1, 2018, the officer would have received 50% of his performance-vesting RSUs that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period; and

Upon retirement at age 63 or older before the end of the3-year performance period, the officer would have received a pro rata portion of his performance-vesting RSUs that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period.

As an additional condition to the vesting of the RSUs awarded in April 2017, the respective recipient is required to remain our employee through the vesting date, except as follows:

Upon termination without “Cause” on or after April 1, 2019, the officer will receive 50% of his performance-vesting RSUs that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period; and

Upon retirement at age 63 or older before the end of the3-year performance period, the officer will receive a pro rata portion of his performance-vesting RSUs that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period.

As an additional condition to the vesting of the RSUs and long-term cash incentives awarded in April 2018, the respective recipient is required to remain our employee through the vesting date, except as follows:

Upon termination without “Cause” on or after April 1, 2020, the officer will receive 50% of his performance-vesting RSUs and performance-vesting long-term cash incentive award that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period; and

Upon retirement at age 63 or older before the end of the3-year performance period, the officer will receive a pro rata portion of his performance-vesting RSUs and performance-vesting long-term cash incentive award that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period.

In addition, in connection with his hire by the company, in December 2016 Mr. Roth was awarded time-vesting RSUs and a target number of RSUs that cliff vest subject to our level of achievement towards a specified performance target for each of 2016, 2017 and 2018. As an additional condition to the vesting of the RSUs awarded to him in December 2016, Mr. Roth is required to remain our employee through the vesting date, except as follows:

Upon termination without “Cause” on or after December 1, 2018, Mr. Roth will receive 50% of his performance-vesting RSUs that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period; and

Upon retirement at age 63 or older before the end of the3-year performance period, Mr. Roth will receive a pro rata portion of his performance-vesting RSUs that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period.

In connection with his promotion to CFO, in July 2018 Mr. Kornblau was awarded additional time-vesting RSUs and time-vesting long-term cash incentives and a target number of performance-vesting RSUs and target amount under a performance-vesting long-term cash incentive award, which cliff vest subject to our level of achievement towards a specified performance target for each of 2018, 2019 and 2020. As an additional condition to the vesting of RSUs and long-term cash incentives awarded to Mr. Kornblau in July 2018, Mr. Kornblau is required to remain employed by us through the vesting date, except that upon termination without “Cause” on or after July 1, 2020, Mr. Kornblau will receive 50% of his performance-vesting RSUs and performance-vesting long-term cash incentive award that eventually vest upon attainment of the performance goals after the end of the3-year performance period.

Under our Incentive Compensation Plan, participants who cease to be employed by us before the end of a performance period due to retirement (defined in the plan as termination without cause at age 60 or older), death or disability are eligible to receive an annual cash incentive award that is prorated to the employment termination date but based upon the actual performance for the entire performance period.

Assuming the listed executive was terminated under each of these circumstances on December 31, 2018, the executive’s payments and benefits would have an estimated value as follows (less applicable withholding taxes):

Ronald Woll

Executive Benefits & Payments

  Termination
Without
Cause ($)
   Termination
for Death or
Disability ($)
   Termination
for Cause ($)
   Other
Voluntary
Termination
($)(1)
 

Annual Cash Incentive (2)

   —      261,261    —      —   

Accelerated RSUs (3)

   75,671    —      —      —   

SERP

   33,911    33,911    33,911    33,911 

Total

   109,582    295,172    33,911    33,911 

(1)

The above table does not include a scenario for termination due to retirement because, as of December 31, 2018, Mr. Woll was not yet retirement-eligible under our policies and plans.

(2)

The actual annual cash incentive award payment that Mr. Woll would be entitled to receive upon his termination may be different from the estimated amount included in the above table, depending on the achievement of payment criteria under the Incentive Compensation Plan.

(3)

The value of the RSUs that would accelerate and fully vest in the event of the termination of employment without Cause was calculated by multiplying 8,016 unvested RSUs by $9.44 (the closing price per share of our common stock on December 31, 2018, as reported on the NYSE). The amounts shown are based on the estimated number of RSUs that would have vested assuming achievement of the target level of performance.

Scott L. Kornblau

Executive Benefits & Payments

  Termination
Without
Cause ($)
   Termination
for Death or
Disability ($)
   Termination
for Cause ($)
   Other
Voluntary
Termination
($)(1)
 

Annual Cash Incentive (2)

   —      164,000    —      —   

Accelerated RSUs (3)

   8,411    —      —      —   

SERP

   2,394    2,394    2,394    2,394 

Total

   10,805    166,394    2,394    2,394 

(1)

The above table does not include a scenario for termination due to retirement because, as of December 31, 2018, Mr. Kornblau was not yet retirement-eligible under our policies and plans.

(2)

The actual annual cash incentive award payment that Mr. Kornblau would be entitled to receive upon his termination may be different from the estimated amount included in the above table, depending on the achievement of payment criteria under the Incentive Compensation Plan.

(3)

The value of the RSUs that would accelerate and fully vest in the event of the termination of employment without Cause was calculated by multiplying 891 unvested RSUs by $9.44 (the closing price per share of our common stock on December 31, 2018, as reported on the NYSE). The amounts shown are based on the estimated number of RSUs that would have vested assuming achievement of the target level of performance.

David L. Roland

Executive Benefits & Payments

  Termination
Without
Cause ($)
   Termination
for Death or
Disability ($)
   Termination
for Cause ($)
   Other
Voluntary
Termination
($)(1)
 

Annual Cash Incentive (2)

   —      162,240    —      —   

Accelerated RSUs (3)

   40,988    —      —      —   

SERP

   29,419    29,419    29,419    29,419 

Total

   70,407    191,659    29,419    29,419 

(1)

The above table does not include a scenario for termination due to retirement because, as of December 31, 2018, Mr. Roland was not yet retirement-eligible under our policies and plans.

(2)

The actual annual cash incentive award payment that Mr. Roland would be entitled to receive upon his termination may be different from the estimated amount included in the above table, depending on the achievement of payment criteria under the Incentive Compensation Plan.

(3)

The value of the RSUs that would accelerate and fully vest in the event of the termination of employment without Cause was calculated by multiplying 4,342 unvested RSUs by $9.44 (the closing price per share of our common stock on December 31, 2018, as reported on the NYSE). The amounts shown are based on the estimated number of RSUs that would have vested assuming achievement of the target level of performance.

Thomas M. Roth

Executive Benefits & Payments

  Termination
Without
Cause ($)
   Termination
for
Retirement,
Death or
Disability ($)
   Termination
for Cause ($)
   Other
Voluntary
Termination
($)
 

Annual Cash Incentive (1)

   —      205,000    —      —   

Accelerated RSUs (2)

   26,668    —      —      —   

SERP

   13,956    13,956    13,956    13,956 

Total

   40,624    218,956    13,956    13,956 

(1)

The actual annual cash incentive award payment that Mr. Roth would be entitled to receive upon his termination may be different from the estimated amount included in the above table, depending on the achievement of payment criteria under the Incentive Compensation Plan.

(2)

The value of the RSUs that would accelerate and fully vest in the event of the termination of employment without Cause was calculated by multiplying 2,825 unvested RSUs by $9.44 (the closing price per share of our common stock on December 31, 2018, as reported on the NYSE). The amounts shown are based on the estimated number of RSUs that would have vested assuming achievement of the target level of performance.

EQUITY PLAN

Our Equity Plan authorizes the issuance of awards including stock options, SARs, RSUs and other stock-based awards (including dividend equivalents) to acquire up to 7,500,000 shares of our common stock, of which 1,330,944 shares had been issued as of December 31, 2018. Stock options have a maximum term of 10 years, subject to earlier termination under certain conditions, and, unless otherwise specified at the time of the grant, vest in four equal, annual installments over four years. SARs represent the right to receive stock or cash, or a combination of stock and cash, equal in value to the difference between the exercise price of the SAR and the market price of the corresponding amount of common stock on the exercise date. SARs have a maximum term of 10 years, subject to earlier termination under certain conditions, and vest as specified at the time of the grant. During 2018, we granted a total of 40,500 SARs and 330,322 RSUs under our Equity Plan.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2018, categorized by (i) equity compensation plans previously approved by our stockholders and (ii) equity compensation plans not previously approved by our stockholders. As indicated in the table, all of our equity compensation plans have been approved by our stockholders.

Plan Category

  Number of securities
to be Issued upon
Exercise of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights (1)
   Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights ($)(2)
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available for Future
Issuance under Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected
in Column (a))
 
  (a)   (b)  (c) 

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders

   1,409,427   54.07   4,759,629 

Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders

   —     —     —   

Total

   1,409,427   54.07   4,759,629 

(1)

This number does not include any shares of our common stockthis column with respect to SARs granted under our Equity Plan because the exercise prices of all outstanding SARS as of December 31, 2018 were higher than $9.44, which was the closing price per share on December 31, 2018, as reported on the NYSE. The number of shares included with respect toAccelerated RSUs includes 987,369 shares of our common stock that would be issued under these awards outstanding at December 31, 2018 if the maximum level of performance is achieved under the awards. If actual performance falls below the maximum level of performance for these awards, fewer shares would be issued.

(2)

The weighted-average exercise price does not take into account RSUs because RSUs do not have an exercise price.

2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Name and Type

of Award (1)

 Grant
Date
  Action
Date
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards ($)(2)
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (#) (3)
  All
Other
Stock
Awards:
RSUs
(#)(4)
  Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock
Awards
($)(5)
 
 Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum 

Marc Edwards

          

Annual Cash

    500,000   1,500,000   2,500,000      

LT Cash (P)

    1,172,500   1,750,000   2,327,500      

RSUs (P)

  04/01/18   03/13/18      77,189   115,207   153,225    2,220,230 

Ronald Woll

          

Annual Cash

      435,435      

LT Cash (P)

    120,600   180,000   239,400      

RSUs (P)

  04/01/18   03/13/18      7,940   11,850   15,761    228,377 

RSUs (T)

  04/01/18   03/13/18         7,900   114,471 

Scott L. Kornblau

          

Annual Cash

      235,700      

LT Cash (P)

    30,150   45,000   59,850      

LT Cash (P)

    35,175   52,500   69,825      

RSUs (P)

  04/01/18   03/13/18      1,985   2,962   3,939    57,076 

RSUs (T)

  04/01/18   03/13/18         1,975   28,618 

RSUs (P)

  07/01/18   06/29/18      1,784   2,662   3,540    75,083 

RSUs (T)

  07/01/18   06/29/18         1,775   37,648 

David L. Roland

          

Annual Cash

      405,600      

LT Cash (P)

    80,400   120,000   159,600      

RSUs (P)

  04/01/18   03/13/18      5,293   7,900   10,507    152,246 

RSUs (T)

  04/01/18   03/13/18         5,267   76,319 

Thomas M. Roth

          

Annual Cash

      410,000      

LT Cash (P)

    65,325   97,500   129,675      

RSUs (P)

  04/01/18   03/13/18      4,301   6,419   8,537    123,701 

RSUs (T)

  04/01/18   03/13/18         4,279   62,003 

(1)

All annual cash incentive awards are performance-vesting. See “Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAnnual Cash Incentive Awards.” Long-term (LT) cash incentive awards and RSUs are either performance-vesting (P) or time-vesting (T). Time-vesting long-term cash incentive awards granted on April 1, 2018 under our Incentive Compensation Plan to our named executive officers (and to Mr. Kornblauawarded on July 1, 2018) are not presented in this table because these awards do not vest based on a performance measure2021 and do not constitutenon-equity incentive plan awards under the SEC’s rules. These awards time vest (half after two years and half after three years) and are not subject to the negative discretion of the Compensation Committee to reduce or eliminate the amount thatOctober 1, 2021 would otherwise be eligible to vest. See “Compensation Discussion and AnalysisLong-Term Stock-Based and Cash-Incentive Awards.have been payable only upon termination without “cause.

(2)

These amounts represent threshold, target and maximum awards, as applicable, under the following types of cash incentive awards granted in 2018 under our Incentive Compensation Plan:

Annual Cash Incentive Awards. Mr. Edwards participated in our Incentive Compensation Plan for 2018 with the potential to earn an annual cash incentive award of up to $500,000 upon achievement of 50% of the company’s target performance goal, up to $1,500,000 upon achievement of the target goal and a maximum of up to $2,500,000 upon achievement of 150% or more of the target goal. For our named executive officers other than Mr. Edwards, the Compensation Committee did not establish threshold or target amounts for 2018 annual cash incentive awards under our Incentive Compensation Plan, but the 2018 annual award cannot exceed the officer’s annual base salary; accordingly, these amounts represent the maximum annual cash incentive awards under our Incentive Compensation Plan for these officers for 2018, regardless of level of company performance. The Compensation Committee retains the right to exercise negative discretion to reduce the amount of each payment under these types of awards at its discretion.

Performance-VestingLong-Term Cash Incentive Awards. These amounts represent threshold, target and maximum values of performance-vesting long-term cash incentive awards granted on April 1, 2018 under our Incentive

Compensation Plan (and threshold, target and maximum values of the performance-vesting long-term cash incentive award granted to Mr. Kornblau on July 1, 2018 under our Incentive Compensation Plan). Performance-vesting long-term cash incentive awards cliff vest subject to our level of achievement towards a specified performance target for each of 2018, 2019 and 2020 and subject further to the negative discretion of the Compensation Committee to reduce or eliminate the amount that would otherwise be eligible to vest. Although the minimum payout is zero, the award provides the respective executive officer the potential to earn up to the amount specified in the “Threshold” column upon achievement of 50% of the company’s target performance goal, up to the amount specified in the “Target” column upon achievement of the target goal and a maximum of up to the amount specified in the “Maximum” column upon achievement of 150% or more of the target goal.

In all cases, these cash incentive awards are subject to forfeiture if the applicable vesting conditions are not met. Because determinations of annual cash incentive awards and performance-vesting long-term cash incentive awards under our Incentive Compensation Plan are based in part on outcomes of company performance and because the Compensation Committee retains the right to exercise negative discretion to reduce the amount of each payment under these types of awards at its discretion, the computation of actual annual cash incentive awards and performance-vesting long-term cash incentive awards generated under the plan upon achievement of certain levels of company performance criteria may differ from the above amounts. For actual annual cash incentive awards paid for 2018, see the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the2018 Summary Compensation Table above. Please read “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Annual Cash Incentive Awards” and “—Long-Term Stock-Based and Cash-IncentiveAwards” for more information concerning awards under our Incentive Compensation Plan.

(3)

These amounts represent threshold, target and maximum awards, as applicable, under performance-vesting RSUs granted in 2018 under our Equity Plan, including threshold, target and maximum numbers of performance-vesting RSUs granted on April 1, 2018 and threshold, target and maximum numbers of performance-vesting RSUs granted to Mr. Kornblau on July 1, 2018. These performance-vesting RSUs cliff vest subject to our level of achievement towards a specified performance target for each of 2018, 2019 and 2020 and subject further to the negative discretion of the Compensation Committee to reduce or eliminate the number of RSUs that would otherwise be eligible to vest. Although the minimum payout is zero, the award provides the respective executive officer the potential to earn up to the amount specified in the “Threshold” column upon achievement of 50% of the company’s target performance goal, up to the amount specified in the “Target” column upon achievement of the target goal and a maximum of up to the amount specified in the “Maximum” column upon achievement of 150% or more of the target goal.

In addition, upon our payment of any cash or stock dividend on our common stock prior to vesting of an RSU award, Mr. Edwards will be credited with a number of additional RSUs in respect of the award outstanding on the dividend record date in an amount equal to the aggregate dividend payable with respect to the shares subject to such award (based on the target number of RSUs) divided by the VWAP immediately preceding such record date, subject to the same vesting schedule and conditions as the original RSUs to which they are attributable. Upon our payment of a special cash dividend on our common stock prior to vesting of a performance-vesting RSU award, the other named executive officers will be credited with a dollar amount equal to the special cash dividend multiplied by the total number of unvested RSUs that are outstanding on the dividend record date (based on the target number of RSUs with respect to performance-vesting RSUs). Any dividend equivalent rights credited to the other named executive officers pursuant to the preceding sentence are payable in cash and are subject to the same vesting, payment and other terms, conditions and restrictions as the original RSUs to which they relate. All RSUs may be settled in cash or our common stock. In all cases, the RSUs are subject to forfeiture if the applicable vesting conditions are not met. Because determinations of performance-vesting RSU awards under our Equity Plan are based in part on outcomes of company performance and because the Compensation Committee retains the right to exercise negative discretion to reduce or eliminate these types of awards at its discretion, the number of actual performance-vesting RSU awards generated under the plan upon achievement of certain levels of company performance criteria may differ from the above numbers. Please read “Compensation Discussion andAnalysis—Long-TermStock-Based andCash-Incentive Awards” for more information concerning awards under our Equity Plan.

(4)

The amounts shown represent the number of time-vesting RSUs granted on April 1, 2018 under our Equity Plan to our named executive officers other than Mr. Edwards (and the value of the time-vesting RSUs granted to Mr. Kornblau on July 1, 2018 under our Equity Plan). These RSUs time vest (half after two years and half after three years) and are not subject to the negative discretion of the Compensation Committee to reduce or eliminate the number of RSUs that would otherwise be eligible to vest.

In addition, upon our payment of a special cash dividend on our common stock prior to vesting of a time-vesting RSU award, these named executive officers will be credited with a dollar amount equal to the special cash dividend multiplied by the total number of unvested RSUs that are outstanding on the record date for the dividend. Any dividend equivalent rights credited to these named executive officers pursuant to the preceding sentence are payable in cash and are subject to the same vesting, payment and other terms, conditions and restrictions as the original RSUs

to which they relate. All RSUs may be settled in cash or our common stock. In all cases, the RSUs are subject to forfeiture if the applicable vesting conditions are not met. Please read “Compensation Discussion andAnalysis—Long-TermStock-Based andCash-Incentive Awards” for more information concerning awards under our Equity Plan.

(5)

Represents the maximum fair value of each equity award recognizable in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (based upon the probable outcome of performance conditions) and does not include any estimates of forfeitures for service-based vesting. See Note 5,Stock-Based Compensation, to our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 included in our Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019.

Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End 2018

  SAR Awards (1)  Stock Awards (2) 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
SARs (#)

Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
SARs (#)

Unexercisable
  SAR
Exercise
Price ($)
  SAR
Expiration
Date
  Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested
(#)(3)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested
($)(3)
  Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested (#)(4)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested ($)(4)
 

Marc Edwards

  —     —     —     —     —     —     491,745   4,642,073 

Ronald Woll

  2,000   —     34.54   10/01/2024   28,375   267,860   78,955   745,335 
  2,000   —     37.16   01/02/2025     

Scott L. Kornblau

  750   —     64.51   04/01/2019   7,608   71,820   18,796   177,434 
  750   —     83.57   07/01/2019     
  750   —     95.61   10/01/2019     
  750   —     99.55   12/31/2019     
  750   —     87.65   04/01/2020     
  750   —     61.79   07/01/2020     
  750   —     68.52   10/01/2020     
  750   —     64.94   12/01/2020     
  750   —     78.90   04/01/2021     
  750   —     70.38   07/01/2021     
  750   —     55.64   10/01/2021     
  750   —     60.13   12/01/2021     
  750   —     66.68   04/02/2022     
  750   —     59.19   07/02/2022     
  750   —     66.04   10/01/2022     
  750   —     68.17   12/03/2022     
  750   —     69.71   04/01/2023     
  750   —     68.62   07/01/2023     
  750   —     62.31   10/01/2023     
  750   —     56.55   01/02/2024     
  750   —     48.36   04/01/2024     
  750   —     49.57   07/01/2024     
  750   —     34.54   10/01/2024     
  750   —     37.16   01/02/2025     

David L. Roland

  2,000   —     34.54   10/01/2024   16,358   154,420   45,236   427,028 
  2,000   —     37.16   01/02/2025     

Thomas M. Roth

  —     —     —     —     14,359   135,549   38,723   365,545 

(1)

Each SAR granted to the named executive officers and reported above vested and became exercisable with respect to 25% of its underlying common stock per year over the first four years of its term, and commenced vesting nine years prior to a date on or about April 1 in the respective calendar year indicated above.

(2)

The number of performance-vesting RSUs was based on the target amount of the award and also includes RSUs credited to Mr. Edwards as a result of payment of cash dividends in respect of our common stock prior to vesting that were outstanding as of December 31, 2018. Pursuant to SEC rules, the market value of each executive’s unvested RSUs was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested RSUs by $9.44 (the closing price per share of our common stock on December 31, 2018, as reported on the NYSE). In April 2016, Mr. Edwards was awarded a target number of 155,857 performance-vesting RSUs, which cliff vest subject to our level of achievement towards a specified performance target for each of 2016, 2017 and 2018. In April 2017, Mr. Edwards was awarded a target number of 220,681 performance-vesting RSUs, which cliff vest subject to our level of achievement towards a specified performance target for each of 2017, 2018 and 2019. In April 2018, Mr. Edwards was awarded a target number of 115,207 performance-vesting RSUs, which cliff vest subject to our level of achievement towards a specified performance target for each of 2018, 2019 and 2020. Theperformance-vesting RSUs awarded to our other named executive officers in April 2016, April 2017 and April 2018 are subject tocliff-vesting depending on the level of achievement against the financial performance goals during a comparablethree-year performance period, and thetime-vesting RSUs awarded to our other named executive officers in April 2016, April 2017 and April 2018 vest over athree-year period (half of thetime-vesting RSUs awarded in 2016 vested on April 1, 2018 and the other half vest on April 1, 2019; half of thetime-vesting RSUs awarded in 2017 vest on April 1, 2019 and the other half vest on April 1, 2020; and half of thetime-vesting RSUs awarded in 2018 vest on April 1, 2020 and the other half vest on April 1, 2021). The performance-vesting RSUs awarded to Mr. Roth in December 2016 are subject to cliff-vesting depending on the level of achievement against the performance goals during a three-year performance period, and the time-vesting RSUs awarded to Mr. Roth in December 2016 vest over a three-year period (half of the time-vesting RSUs vested on December 1, 2018 and the other half vest on December 1, 2019. The performance-vesting RSUs awarded to Mr. Kornblau in July 2018 are subject to cliff-vesting depending on the level of achievement against the performance goals during a three-year performance period, and the time-vesting RSUs awarded to Mr. Kornblau in July 2018 vest over a three-year period (half of the time-vesting RSUs vest on July 1, 2020 and the other half vest on July 1, 2021). All of the RSUs are subject to forfeiture if the applicable vesting conditions are not met. See “Compensation Discussion andAnalysis—Long-TermStock-Based and Cash-Incentive Awards” above.

(3)

These represent unvested time-vesting RSUs granted pursuant to our Equity Plan in 2016, 2017 and 2018 to named executive officers other than Mr. Edwards.

(4)

These represent unvested performance-vesting RSUs granted pursuant to our Equity Plan in 2016, 2017 and 2018.

2018 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

Name

  SARs Awards   RSU Awards 
  Number of Shares
Acquired
on Exercise (#)
   Value Realized
on

Exercise ($)
   Number of Shares
Acquired
on Vesting (#)
   Value Realized
on Vesting ($)(1)
 

Marc Edwards

   —      —      112,438    1,677,575 

Ronald Woll

   —      —      18,638    275,825 

Scott L. Kornblau

   —      —      3,533    52,121 

David L. Roland

   —      —      12,496    185,064 

Thomas M. Roth

   —      —      1,884    23,738 

(1)

The values realized upon vesting of RSU awards contained in the table are based on the market value of our common stock on the date of vesting.

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our current CEO, Mr. Edwards.Wolford. For 2018:2022:

 

the annual total compensation of the employee identified at median of our company (other than our CEO) was $116,226;$107,911; and

 

  

the annual total compensation of Mr. Edwards,Wolford, as reflected in the20182022 Summary Compensation Table above, was $5,732,083.$3,698,422.

Based on this information, for 20182022 the ratio of the annual total annualized compensation of Mr. EdwardsWolford to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was estimated to be approximately 4934 to 1.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in accordance with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their particular compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of Mr. EdwardsWolford and our median employee, we used the following methodology, material assumptions, adjustments and estimates:

 

We identified our median-compensated employee from all full-time, part-time and temporary workers (with the exception of(except for our employees in Singapore as described below) who were included as employees on our payroll records as of December 31, 2018,2022, based on actual base salary, overtime and bonuses paid for calendar year 2018.2022. We believe the use of such cash compensation for all employees is a consistently-applied compensation measure because we do not widely distribute equity awards to employees.

 

We determined that, as of December 31, 2018,2022, our employee population for purposes of this pay ratio calculation consisted of approximately 2,1891,993 individuals globally. As permitted by SEC rules, when identifying our median employee for purposes of the pay ratio calculation, we excluded the compensation of our three employees based in Singapore. After adjusting for the excluded Singapore employees, our employee population consisted of approximately 2,186 individuals.

 

56


Compensation for newly-hired employees who worked less than a full year was annualized. The pay for employees based outside of the U.S. was converted to U.S. dollars using the average of the exchange rates in effect on each of January 1, 20182022 and December 31, 2018.2022. We did not make any cost of living adjustments in identifying the median employee. The median employee from our analysis had anomalous compensation characteristics and was substituted with a similarly-situated employee with a materially equivalent compensation level.

 

  

After identifying the median employee based on total cash compensation, we calculated annual total compensation for such employee using the same methodology we use for our named executive officersNEOs as set forth in the20182022 Summary Compensation Table.

57


ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(Proposal No. 2)

AsAlthough we are not required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act,to do so, we are asking our stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officersNEOs as we have described it in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” “Executive Compensation” and “Equity PlanExecutive Compensation” sections of this proxy statement. This advisory vote is sometimes referred to as“say-on-pay.”

While thissay-on-pay advisory vote is not binding on our company,us, management and the Compensation Committee will review the voting results for purposes of obtaining information regarding investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices. If there is a significant number of negative votes, we will seek to understand the concerns that influenced the negative votes and consider them in making decisions about our executive compensation program in the future. At our 20182022 annual meeting, our stockholders approved ournon-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers,NEOs through December 31, 2020, with more than 85%approximately 92% of the votes cast on the proposal voting in favor of its approval.

We believe that the information we have provided withinin this proxy statement demonstrates that our executive compensation program is designed appropriately and is working to ensure management’s interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term value creation. As described above in detail underin the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” “Executive Compensation” and “Equity PlanExecutive Compensation” sections of this proxy statement, our compensation program reflects a balanceduring 2022 included both fixed compensation and variable compensation, with most of short-term incentives (including performance-based annual cash incentive awards)the executive compensation being at risk and long-term incentives (including performance equity and cash incentive awards that are subject to vesting after a3-year period)the satisfaction of performance-based incentives that arewere designed to support our long-term business strategies and promote creation of stockholderstakeholder value. We believe that our program does not exceed the competitive market for talent and is (i) sensitive to our financial performance and (ii) oriented to long-term incentives, in order to seek to promote our long-term profitability. We believe our program delivers reasonable pay that is strongly linked to our performance over time and rewards sustainedachievement of performance that is aligned with long-term stockholderstakeholder interests.

Accordingly, our Board of Directors strongly endorses the company’s executive compensation program and recommends a vote FOR the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to our company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC,in this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and any related material disclosed in this proxy statement, is hereby approved on an advisory basis.

58


ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE

ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(Proposal No. 3)

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders the opportunity to indicate how frequently we should seek future advisory say-on-pay votes on the compensation of our NEOs. Under this proposal, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer that the advisory say-on-pay vote on the compensation of our NEOs occur every one, two or three years. Stockholders may also abstain from voting on this proposal.

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are required to hold at least once every six years an advisory stockholder vote to determine the frequency of the advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation. At our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved holding an advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs each year. The Board believes that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation continues to be the best approach because it allows our stockholders to provide input on our compensation policies and programs on a regular basis. This advisory vote, although not binding on the Board, will be considered by the Board and our Compensation Committee when determining the frequency of holding future advisory say-on-pay votes.

Accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends a vote to conduct an advisory say-on-pay stockholder vote EVERY YEAR.

59


RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

(Proposal No. 3)4)

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP (D(or D&T) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm (independent auditor) for fiscal year 2019.2023. Although it is not required to do so, our Board is submitting the selection of D&T for ratification by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting. If our stockholders do not ratify the selection of D&T, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection. Regardless of the outcome of the vote, however, the Audit Committee at all times has the authority within its discretion to recommend and approve any appointment, retention or dismissal of our independent auditor.

D&T has served as our independent auditor since 1989. We expect that representativesa representative of D&T will be present athave the Annual Meeting. If representatives from D&T attend the meeting, they will be afforded an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so desire and will be available during the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Audit Fees

D&T and its affiliates billed the following fees for the years ended December 31, 20182022 and 2017:2021:

 

  2018   2017   2022   2021 

Audit Fees (1)

  $2,144,700   $2,389,100   $2,148,000   $3,225,000 

Audit-Related Fees

   —      —      —      —   

Tax Fees (2)

   —      25,000    16,000    54,000 

All Other Fees (3)

   5,745    9,200    4,000    79,000 

 

   

 

 

Total

  $2,150,445   $2,423,300   $2,168,000   $3,358,000 

 

(1)

Audit Fees include the aggregate fees and expenses for the audit of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, reviews of our quarterly financial statements and various statutory audits of our foreign subsidiaries and aggregate fees and expenses associated with the consent for our Registration Statement on FormS-3 filed with the SEC in March 2018.subsidiaries.

(2)

Tax Feesfees include the aggregate fees and expenses forrelated to tax compliance andconsultations with respect to tax planning and consulting services.disputes outside the scope of the annual audit of our financial statements.

(3)

All Other Fees include fees and expenses for a subscription to an accounting research tool and the 2017 review of our Mexico import registry.a cybersecurity assessment.

Auditor Engagement andPre-Approval Policy

In order to assure the continued independence of our independent auditor, currently D&T, the Audit Committee has a policy requiringpre-approval of all audit andnon-audit services performed by the independent auditor. Under this policy, the Audit Committee annuallypre-approves certain limited, specified recurring services that may be provided by D&T. All other engagements for services that may be provided by D&T must be specificallypre-approved by the Audit Committee, or a designated committee member to whom this authority has been delegated. Since its adoption of this policy, the Audit Committee or its designee haspre-approved all engagements by us and our subsidiaries for services of D&T, including the terms and fees thereof, and concluded that such engagements were compatible with the continued independence of D&T in serving as our independent auditor.

Our Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposal No. 3.4.

60


APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO OUR CERTIFICATE

OF INCORPORATION TO DECLASSIFY OUR BOARD

(Proposal No. 5)

Upon the recommendation of the NG&S Committee, the Board adopted, subject to stockholder approval, the amendments to our Certification of Incorporation set forth in the form of Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A (or the Declassification Amendment) to effectuate the declassification of the Board as described in the Declassification Amendment and institute annual elections of all directors on a phased-in basis.

If this Proposal No. 5 is approved by the stockholders, we will cause the Declassification Amendment to become effective by filing it with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. If this Proposal No. 5 is not approved by the stockholders, then we will not file the Declassification Amendment and the Board will remain classified with the directors continuing to serve three-year terms.

Description of the Declassification Amendment and Reasons for Declassifying the Board

Our Certificate of Incorporation currently divides our Board into three staggered classes of directors, with each class of directors elected every three years for a three-year term. Stockholders currently elect only one class of directors each year, constituting approximately one-third of the Board. After consideration, the Board has determined that it would be in the best interests of the stockholders to declassify the Board to allow the stockholders to vote on the election of the entire Board each year, rather than on a staggered basis. When fully implemented after the phase-in period, the Declassification Amendment would permit stockholders to vote annually for all directors.

If this proposal is approved by the stockholders and implemented, the declassification of the Board would be phased-in over a period of three years and three annual meetings of stockholders, beginning with the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders and concluding at the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders. The advantage of phasing-in the declassification is that each director elected prior to the change would then be able to serve his or her full remaining term on the Board. Directors elected at or after the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders would be elected to one-year terms expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders following their election. However, the term of any director elected or appointed to the Board before the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, included those elected at the Annual Meeting, would continue to be approximately three years. Similarly, any director elected or appointed to fill a vacancy opened by the departure of a director serving a classified term would serve the remainder of the departed director’s term. Declassification of the Board would be complete at the conclusion of the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders, and, as of that year and going forward, all directors would serve one-year terms.

The text of the proposed Declassification Amendment, setting forth the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation contemplated by this proposal, is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A (with deleted text shown in strikethrough and added text shown double underlined). The text of Appendix A is incorporated into this discussion by reference. This description of the proposed Declassification Amendment is only a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual text of the proposed Declassification Amendment set forth in Appendix A, which you are encouraged to read in its entirety.

In evaluating whether to recommend, approve and adopt the Declassification Amendment, subject to stockholder approval, the NG&S Committee and the Board considered factors that favor continuing with a classified board structure, as well as factors that favor adopting a declassified board structure. A classified board structure may offer some advantages. It allows a majority of the board to remain in place from year to year, which promotes board continuity and stability, and encourages the board to plan and commit to long-term goals and perspectives for the company’s stockholders. A classified board ensures that at any one time,

61


approximately two-thirds of the elected board has experience with the business and operations of the company it manages. Further, a classified board may provide a greater opportunity to protect the interests of stockholders in the event of an unsolicited takeover offer. In contrast, a classified board can also be viewed as diminishing a board’s accountability to stockholders, because such a structure does not enable stockholders to evaluate directors and the board through an annual vote and therefore hinders stockholders from taking a more active role in shaping and implementing corporate governance policies. Public companies with classified boards also commonly face increased scrutiny from proxy advisory firms and institutional investors. Ultimately, after weighing the relevant considerations, including the factors described above, the NG&S Committee and the Board determined that it would be in the best interests of the company and our stockholders to amend our Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the board as set forth in the Declassification Amendment.

Vote Required

Approval of the adoption of the Declassification Amendment to eliminate the classified board requires the affirmative vote of 2/3 of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the Record Date.

Our Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal No. 5.

62


SOLICITATION EXPENSES

We will bear the cost of preparing, printing and mailing Notices, this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card and of this solicitation of proxies on behalf of our Board of Directors.Board. In addition to solicitation by mail, we may solicit proxies personally, by telephone or other means. We intend to request brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and others who hold our common stock in their names to solicit proxies from the persons who beneficially own such stock and we will reimburse these brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and others for the reasonable costs of sending the proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our common stock.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH DIAMOND OFFSHORE AND OTHERS

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with our Lead Director,Chairman, othernon-management directors Independent Directors or our Board as a whole by writing to Diamond Offshore, 15415 Katy Freeway,Frwy, Suite 100, Houston, TexasTX 77094, Attention:Attn: Corporate Secretary. Stockholders should clearly specify in each communication the name of the individual director or group of directors to whom the communication is addressed. Inquiries sent by mail will be reviewed by our Corporate Secretary and, if they pertain to the functions of the Board or Board committees or if the Corporate Secretary otherwise determines that they should be brought to the intended recipient’s attention, they will be forwarded to the intended recipient. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls, auditing or compliance matters will be brought to the attention of our Audit Committee and handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee. Items that are unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board, such as personal employee complaints, resumes and other forms of job inquiries, surveys, service complaints, requests for donations, business solicitations or advertisements, will not be forwarded to the directors. In addition, material that is considered to beviewed as hostile, threatening, illegal or similarly unsuitable will not be forwarded.

Stockholder proposals intendedSTOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR OUR 2024 ANNUAL MEETING

Stockholders who desire to submit a proposal for inclusion in theour proxy statement to be issued in connection withmaterials for our 20202024 annual meeting of stockholders may do so by complying with the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. To be eligible for inclusion in our proxy materials under Rule 14a-8, stockholder proposals must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than December 1, 2023 and otherwise comply with the rules and procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8. Stockholder proposals should be addressed to:to Diamond Offshore, 15415 Katy Freeway, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77094, Attention: Corporate Secretary,Secretary.

Under our Bylaws, with respect to any stockholder proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement under Rule 14a-8, and with respect to any stockholder nominees for director, a stockholder’s notice must be received no later than December 5, 2019.

Stockholder proposals submitted outside of the SEC’s procedures for including such proposals in our proxy statement must be mailed or delivered to the attention of theDiamond Offshore, 15415 Katy Frwy, Suite 100, Houston, TX 77094, Attention: Corporate Secretary, at the address above and must be received by our Corporate Secretary no earlier than January 11, 2024, and not later than February 15, 2020.10, 2024, unless the date of the next annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after May 10, 2024. Any such stockholder proposal or director nomination must comply in all respects with the specific requirements included in our Bylaws (including, if applicable, with respect to Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act). If a proposal is received before or after thatthe applicable date, our proxy for the 2020our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders may confer discretionary authority to vote on such matter without any discussion of such matter in the proxy statement for the 2020our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.

63


OTHER MATTERS

While management has no reason to believe that any other business will be presented, if any other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted as to such matters in accordance with the best judgment of the proxy holders.

 

BY ORDEROFTHE BOARDOF DIRECTORS

By Order of the Board of Directors

LOGO

LOGO

DAVID L. ROLAND

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

64


APPENDIX A

AnnUAL meeTingDECLASSIFICATION AMENDMENT

THIRDFOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF DiAmOnD OFFshORe DRiLLing, inc. Annual Meeting of INCORPORATION

OF

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (the “Company”Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as it now exists or may hereafter be amended and supplemented (the “DGCL”), hereby certifies as follows:

1.

The name of the corporation is Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. The original Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on April 12, 1989 under the name Majestic Offshore, Inc. The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on May 28, 1998.

2.

This ThirdFourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (this “Certificate”), which restates, integrates and amends the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation as heretofore in effect, has been duly adopted by the corporation in accordance with Sections 242 and 245 of the DGCL.

3.

The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation as heretofore in effect is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

ARTICLE I

NAME

The name of the corporation is Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.

ARTICLE II

REGISTERED OFFICE AND AGENT

The address of the Corporation’s registered office in the State of Delaware is 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, State of Delaware 19801, and the name of its registered agent at such address is The Corporation Trust Company.

ARTICLE III

PURPOSE

The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the DGCL.

ARTICLE IV

AUTHORIZED CAPITAL

The Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock to be designated, respectively, “Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock.” The total number of shares of capital stock that the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 800,000,000. The total number of shares of Common Stock that the Corporation is authorized to issue is 750,000,000, having a par value of $0.0001 per share, and the total number of shares of Preferred Stock that the Corporation is authorized to issue is 50,000,000, having a par value of $0.0001 per share.

A-1


ARTICLE V

CAPITAL STOCK

The designations and the powers, privileges and rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof in respect of each class of capital stock of the Corporation are as follows:

A.

COMMON STOCK.

1.    General. The voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and powers of the Common Stock are subject to and qualified by the rights, powers and preferences of any series of Preferred Stock as may be designated by the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board of Directors) Date: May 15, 2019and outstanding from time to time.

2.    Voting. Except as otherwise provided herein or expressly required by law, each holder of Common Stock, as such, shall be entitled to vote on each matter submitted to a vote of stockholders and shall be entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held of record by such holder as of the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote on such matter. Except as otherwise required by law, holders of Common Stock, as such, shall not be entitled to vote on any amendment to this Certificate (including any Certificate of Designation (as defined below)) that relates solely to the rights, powers, preferences (or the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof) or other terms of one or more outstanding series of Preferred Stock if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either separately or together with the holders of one or more other such series, to vote thereon pursuant to this Certificate (including any Certificate of Designation) or pursuant to the DGCL.

Subject to the rights of any holders of any outstanding series of Preferred Stock, the number of authorized shares of Common Stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the stock of the Corporation entitled to vote, irrespective of the provisions of Section 242(b)(2) of the DGCL.

3.    Dividends. Subject to applicable law and the rights and preferences of any holders of any outstanding series of Preferred Stock, the holders of Common Stock, as such, shall be entitled to the payment of dividends on the Common Stock when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors in accordance with applicable law.

4.    Liquidation. Subject to the rights and preferences of any holders of any shares of any outstanding series of Preferred Stock, in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, whether voluntary or involuntary, the funds and assets of the Corporation that may be legally distributed to the Corporation’s stockholders shall be distributed among the holders of the then outstanding Common Stock pro rata in accordance with the number of shares of Common Stock held by each such holder.

5.    Transfer Rights. Subject to applicable law and the transfer restrictions set forth in Article VII of the bylaws of the Corporation (as such Bylaws may be amended from time to time, the “Bylaws”), shares of Common Stock and the rights and obligations associated therewith shall be fully transferable to any transferee.

B.

PREFERRED STOCK

Shares of Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series, each of such series to have such terms as stated or expressed herein and in the resolution or resolutions providing for the creation and issuance of such series adopted by the Board of Directors as hereinafter provided.

Authority is hereby expressly granted to the Board of Directors from time to time to issue the Preferred Stock in one or more series, and in connection with the creation of any such series, by adopting a resolution or

A-2


resolutions providing for the issuance of the shares thereof and by filing a certificate of designation relating thereto in accordance with the DGCL (a “Certificate of Designation”), to determine and fix the number of shares of such series and such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations, preferences and relative participating, optional or other special rights, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, including without limitation thereof, dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation preferences, and to increase or decrease (but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding) the number of shares of any series as shall be stated and expressed in such resolutions, all to the fullest extent now or hereafter permitted by the DGCL. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the resolution or resolutions providing for the creation and issuance of any series of Preferred Stock may provide that such series shall be superior or rank equally or be junior to any other series of Preferred Stock to the extent permitted by law and this Certificate (including any Certificate of Designation). Except as otherwise required by law, holders of any series of Preferred Stock shall be entitled only to such voting rights, if any, as shall expressly be granted thereto by this Certificate (including any Certificate of Designation).

The number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the stock of the Corporation entitled to vote, irrespective of the provisions of Section 242(b)(2) of the DGCL.

C.

NONVOTING EQUITY SECURITIES

The Corporation shall not issue nonvoting equity securities; provided, however the foregoing restriction shall (i) have no further force and effect beyond that required under Section 1123(a)(6) of Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), (ii) only have such force and effect for so long as Section 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code is in effect and applicable to the Corporation, and (iii) in all events may be amended or eliminated in accordance with applicable law as from time to time may be in effect. The prohibition on the issuance of nonvoting equity securities is included in this Certificate in compliance with Section 1123(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code.

ARTICLE VI

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

For the management of the business and for the conduct of the affairs of the Corporation it is further provided that:

A.    TheUntil the election of directors at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation to be held in 2026, the directors of the Corporation shall be classified with respect to the time for which they severally hold office into three classes, designated as Class I, Class II and Class III. Each class shall consist, as nearly as may be possible, of one third of the total number of directors constituting the whole Board of Directors. The initial Class I directors shall serve for a term expiring at the first annual meeting of the stockholders following the filing and effectiveness of thisthe Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. (Eastern Time) Place: LoewsApril 23, 2021 (the “Effective Time”); the initial Class II directors shall serve for a term expiring at the second annual meeting of the stockholders following the Effective Time; and the initial Class III directors shall serve for a term expiring at the third annual meeting following the Effective Time. At each annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation beginning with the first annual meeting of stockholders following the Effective Time, until the annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation to be held in 2024, the successors of the class of directors whose term expires at that meeting shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year following the year of their election. Each director shall hold office until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal in accordance with this Certificate. Commencing with the election of directors at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation to be held in 2024, at each annual meeting of stockholders, all directors whose term expires at that meeting

A-3


shall be elected for a one-year term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation, and commencing with the election of directors at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation to be held in 2026, the classification of the Board of Directors shall terminate.

B.    Except as otherwise expressly provided by the DGCL or this Certificate, the business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of the Board of Directors. The number of directors that shall constitute the whole Board of Directors shall be fixed exclusively by one or more resolutions adopted from time to time by the Board of Directors in accordance with the Bylaws. IfUntil the classification of the Board of Directors terminates at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation to be held in 2026, if the number of directors is changed, any increase or decrease shall be apportioned among the classes so as to maintain the number of directors in each class as nearly equal as possible, and any such additional director of any class elected to fill a newly created directorship resulting from an increase in such class shall hold office for a term that shall coincide with the remaining term of that class, but in no case shall a decrease in the number of directors remove or shorten the term of any incumbent director.

C.    Subject to the special rights of the holders of one or more outstanding series of Preferred Stock to elect directors, the Board of Directors or any individual director may be removed from office at any time, but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of voting stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at an election of directors.

D.    Subject to the special rights of the holders of one or more outstanding series of Preferred Stock to elect directors, except as otherwise provided by law, any vacancies on the Board of Directors resulting from death, resignation, disqualification, retirement, removal or other causes and any newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the number of directors shall be filled exclusively by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office, even though less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director (other than any directors elected by the separate vote of one or more outstanding series of Preferred Stock), and shall not be filled by the stockholders. AnyUntil the classification of the Board of Directors terminates at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation to be held in 2026, any director appointed in accordance with the preceding sentence shall hold office until the expiration of the term of the class to which such director shall have been appointed or until his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, or removal, and thereafter any director appointed in accordance with the preceding sentence shall hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation or until his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, or removal.

E.    Whenever the holders of any one or more series of Preferred Stock issued by the Corporation shall have the right, voting separately as a series or separately as a class with one or more such other series, to elect directors at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, the election, term of office, removal and other features of such directorships shall be governed by the terms of this Certificate (including any Certificate of Designation). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Article VI, the number of directors that may be elected by the holders of any such series of Preferred Stock shall be in addition to the number fixed pursuant to paragraph B of this Article VI, and the total number of directors constituting the whole Board of Directors shall be automatically adjusted accordingly. Except as otherwise provided in this Certificate (including any Certificate of Designation) in respect of one or more series of Preferred Stock, whenever the holders of any series of Preferred Stock having such right to elect additional directors are divested of such right pursuant to the provisions of this Certificate (including any Certificate of Designation), the terms of office of all such additional directors elected by the holders of such series of Preferred Stock, or elected to fill any vacancies resulting from the death, resignation, disqualification or removal of such additional directors, shall forthwith terminate (in which case each such director thereupon shall cease to be qualified as, and shall cease to be, a director) and the total authorized number of directors of the Corporation shall automatically be reduced accordingly.

F.    In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by statute, the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to adopt, amend or repeal the Bylaws. The stockholders of the Corporation shall also have

A-4


the power to adopt, amend or repeal the Bylaws; provided, that in addition to any vote of the holders of any class or series of stock of the Corporation required by applicable law or by this Certificate (including any Certificate of Designation in respect of one or more series of Preferred Stock) or the Bylaws of the Corporation, the adoption, amendment or repeal of the Bylaws of the Corporation by the stockholders of the Corporation shall require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of voting stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in an election of directors; provided, further, that no Bylaws hereafter adopted by the stockholders shall invalidate any prior act of the Board of Directors that would have been valid if such Bylaws had not been adopted.

G.    The directors of the Corporation need not be elected by written ballot unless the Bylaws so provide.

ARTICLE VII

MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS; ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT

A.    Any action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders of the Corporation must be effected at an annual or special meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation, and shall not be taken by written consent in lieu of a meeting. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any action required or permitted to be taken by the holders of any series of Preferred Stock, voting separately as a series or separately as a class with one or more other such series, may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, to the extent expressly so provided by the applicable provisions of this Certificate (including any Certificate of Designation) relating to such series of Preferred Stock, if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holders of outstanding shares of the relevant series of Preferred Stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted and shall be delivered to the Corporation in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL.

B.    Subject to the special rights of the holders of one or more series of Preferred Stock, and to the requirements of applicable law, special meetings of the stockholders of the Corporation may be called for any purpose or purposes, at any time only by or at the direction of the majority of the Board of Directors, the Chairperson of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer or President, in each case, in accordance with the Bylaws, and shall not be called by any other person or persons. Any such special meeting so called may be postponed, rescheduled or cancelled by the Board of Directors or other person calling the meeting.

C.    Advance notice of stockholder nominations for the election of directors and of other business proposed to be brought by stockholders before any meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation shall be given in the manner provided in the Bylaws. Any business transacted at any special meeting of stockholders shall be limited to matters relating to the purpose or purposes identified in the notice of meeting.

ARTICLE VIII

LIMITATION OF DIRECTOR LIABILITY

No director of the Corporation shall have any personal liability to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the DGCL as the same exists or hereafter may be amended. Any amendment, repeal or modification of this Article VIIVIII, or the adoption of any provision of this Certificate inconsistent with this Article VIIVIII, shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director of the Corporation with respect to any act or omission occurring prior to such amendment, repeal, modification or adoption. If the DGCL is hereafter amended after the Effective Time to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability of a director of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited, as applicable, to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL as so amended.

A-5


ARTICLE IX

BUSINESS COMBINATION

The Corporation hereby expressly elects not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL.

ARTICLE X

INDEMNIFICATION

The Corporation shall indemnify any person to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by applicable law, as now or hereafter in effect, who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the Corporation, or while a director or officer of the Corporation is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, and such right to indemnification shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director or officer of the Corporation and shall inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors and personal and legal representatives; provided, however, that, except for proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification, the Corporation shall not be obligated to indemnify any director or officer (or his or her heirs, executors or personal or legal representatives) in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person unless such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized or consented to by the Board of Directors. The right to indemnification conferred by this Article X shall include the right to be paid by the Corporation the expenses (including attorney’s fees) incurred in defending or otherwise participating in any proceeding in advance of its final disposition, subject to the Corporation’s receipt, to the extent required by the DGCL, of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer receiving advancement to repay the amount advanced if it shall ultimately be determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified by the Corporation under this Article X. The Corporation may, to the extent authorized from time to time by the Board of Directors, provide rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses to employees and agents of the Corporation similar to those conferred in this Article X to directors and officers of the Corporation. The rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses conferred in this Article X shall not be exclusive of any other right which any person may have or hereafter acquire under this Certificate, the Bylaws, any statute, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise. Any repeal or modification of this Article X shall not adversely affect any rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses of a director or officer of the Corporation (collectively, the “Covered Persons”) existing at the time of such repeal or modification with respect to any acts or omissions occurring prior to such repeal or modification.

The Corporation hereby acknowledges that certain Covered Persons may have rights to indemnification and advancement of expenses (directly or through insurance obtained by any such entity) provided by one or more third parties (collectively, the “Other Indemnitors”), and which may include third parties for whom such Covered Person serves as a manager, member, officer, employee or agent. The Corporation hereby agrees and acknowledges that notwithstanding any such rights that a Covered Person may have with respect to any Other Indemnitor(s), (i) the Corporation is the indemnitor of first resort with respect to all Covered Persons and all obligations to indemnify and provide advancement of expenses to Covered Persons and (ii) the Corporation shall be required to indemnify and advance the full amount of expenses incurred by the Covered Persons, to the fullest extent required by law, the terms of this Certificate, the Bylaws, any agreement to which the Corporation is a party, any vote of the stockholders or the Board of Directors, or otherwise, without regard to any rights the Covered Persons may have against the Other Indemnitors. The Corporation further agrees that no advancement or payment by the Other Indemnitors with respect to any claim for which the Covered Persons have sought indemnification from the Corporation shall affect the foregoing and the Other Indemnitors shall have a right of contribution and/or be subrogated to the extent of any such advancement or payment to all of the rights of recovery of the Covered Persons against the Corporation. These rights shall be a contract right, and the Other

A-6


Indemnitors are express third party beneficiaries of the terms of this paragraph. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the obligations of the Corporation under this paragraph shall only apply to Covered Persons in their capacity as Covered Persons.

ARTICLE XI

COMPETITION AND CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES

A.    In recognition and anticipation that certain members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of the Corporation (“Non-Employee Directors”) and their respective Affiliates, including (i) any portfolio company in which they or any of their respective investment fund Affiliates have made a debt or equity investment (and vice versa) or (ii) any of their respective limited partners, non-managing members or other similar direct or indirect investors may now engage and may continue to engage in the same or similar activities or related lines of business as those in which the Corporation, directly or indirectly, may engage and/or other business activities that overlap with or compete with those in which the Corporation, directly or indirectly, may engage, the provisions of this Article XI are set forth to regulate and define the conduct of certain affairs of the Corporation with respect to certain classes or categories of business opportunities as they may involve any Non-Employee Director or their respective Affiliates and the powers, rights, duties and liabilities of the Corporation and its directors, officers and stockholders in connection therewith.

B.    None of any Non-Employee Director (including any Non-Employee Director who serves as an officer of the Corporation in both his or her director and officer capacities) or his or her Affiliates (other than the Corporation, any of its subsidiaries or their respective officers or employees) (the Persons (as defined below) identified above being referred to, collectively, as “Identified Persons” and, individually, as an “Identified Person”) shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, have any fiduciary duty to refrain from directly or indirectly (A) engaging in and possessing interests in other business ventures of every type and description, including those engaged in the same or similar business activities or lines of business in which the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries now engages or proposes to engage or (B) competing with the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries, on its own account, or in partnership with, or as an employee, officer, director or shareholder of any other Person (other than the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries), and, to the fullest extent permitted by law, no Identified Person shall be liable to the Corporation or its stockholders or to any Affiliate of the Corporation for Holdersbreach of any fiduciary duty solely by reason of the fact that such Identified Person engages in any such activities. To the fullest extent permitted from time to time by the laws of the State of Delaware, the Corporation hereby renounces any interest or expectancy in, or right to be offered an opportunity to participate in, any business opportunity that may be a corporate opportunity for an Identified Person and the Corporation or any of its Affiliates, except as provided in Section C of Article XI. Subject to Section C of Article XI, in the event that any Identified Person acquires knowledge of a potential transaction or matter that may be a corporate or other business opportunity for itself, herself or himself, or any of its or his or her Affiliates, and the Corporation or any of its Affiliates, such Identified Person shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, have no duty (fiduciary, contractual or otherwise) to communicate or present such transaction or matter to the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries, as the case may be and, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall not be liable to the Corporation or its stockholders or to any subsidiary of the Corporation for breach of any duty (fiduciary, contractual or otherwise) as a stockholder or director of the Corporation by reason of the fact that such Identified Person, directly or indirectly, pursues or acquires such opportunity for itself, herself or himself, directs such opportunity to another Person or does not present such opportunity to the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries (or its Affiliates).

C.    The Corporation does not renounce its interest in any corporate opportunity offered to any Non-Employee Director (including any Non-Employee Director who serves as an officer of this Corporation) if such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of the Corporation, and the provisions of Section (B) of this Article XIIXI shall not apply to any such corporate opportunity.

A-7


D.    In addition to and notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Article XI, a corporate opportunity shall not be deemed to be a potential corporate opportunity for the Corporation if it is a business opportunity that (a) the Corporation is neither financially or legally able, nor contractually permitted to undertake, (b) from its nature, is not in the line of the Corporation’s business or is of no practical advantage to the Corporation or (c) is one in which the Corporation has no interest or reasonable expectancy.

E.    For purposes of this Article XI, (i) “Affiliate” shall mean, (a) in respect of a Non-Employee Director, any Person that, directly or indirectly, is controlled by such Non-Employee Director (other than the Corporation and any entity that is controlled by the Corporation) and (b) in respect of the Corporation, any Person that, directly or indirectly, is controlled by the Corporation; and (ii) “Person” shall mean any individual, corporation, general or limited partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, association or any other entity.

F.    To the fullest extent permitted by law, any Person purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of this Article XI.

ARTICLE XII

EXCLUSIVE FORUM

A.    Unless the Corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery (the “Chancery Court”) of the State of Delaware (or, in the event that the Chancery Court does not have jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware or other state courts of the State of Delaware) and any appellate court thereof shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action, suit or proceeding brought on behalf of the Corporation, (ii) any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or stockholder of the Corporation to the Corporation or to the Corporation’s stockholders, (iii) any action, suit or proceeding arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or the Bylaws or this Certificate (as either may be amended from time to time), (iv) any action, suit or proceeding as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, or (v) any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim against the Corporation or any current or former director, officer or stockholder governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of this Article XII(A) shall not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or any other claim for which the federal courts of the United States have exclusive jurisdiction.

B.    Unless the Corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.

C.    Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any security of the Corporation shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to this Article XII.

ARTICLE XIII

MISCELLANEOUS

A.     The Corporation reserves the right at any time and from time to time to amend, alter, change, add or repeal any provision contained in this Certificate, and other provisions authorized by the laws of the State of Delaware at the time in force that may be added or inserted, in the manner now or hereafter prescribed by this Certificate and the DGCL; and notwithstanding anything contained in this Certificate or the Bylaws to the contrary, in addition to any vote required by applicable law, the following provisions in this Certificate may be

A-8


amended, altered, repealed or rescinded, in whole or in part, or any provision inconsistent therewith or herewith may be adopted, only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the total voting power of all the then outstanding shares of stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class: Article V(B) (Preferred Stock), Article VI (Board of Directors), Article VII (Meeting of Stockholders; Action by Written Consent), Article VIII (Limitation of Director Liability), Article IX (Business Combination), Article X (Indemnification), Article XI (Competition and Corporate Opportunities), Article XII (Exclusive Forum) and this Article XIII (Miscellaneous).

B.     If any provision or provisions of this Certificate shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable as applied to any circumstance for any reason whatsoever: (i) the validity, legality and enforceability of such provisions in any other circumstance and of the remaining provisions of this Certificate (including, without limitation, each portion of any paragraph of this Certificate containing any such provision held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable that is not itself held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable) shall not, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, in any way be affected or impaired thereby and (ii) to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the provisions of this Certificate (including, without limitation, each such portion of any paragraph of this Certificate containing any such provision held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable) shall be construed so as to permit the Corporation to protect its directors, officers, employees and agents from personal liability in respect of their good faith service to or for the benefit of the Corporation to the fullest extent permitted by law.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this ThirdFourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be executed by its duly authorized officer as this 23rdday of April, 20212023.

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

By:
Name:

David L. Roland

Title:

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

A-9


P.O. BOX 8016, CARY, NC 27512-9903
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! PLEASE VOTE BY:
INTERNET
Go To: www.proxypush.com/DO
• Cast your vote online
• Have your Proxy Card ready
• Follow the simple instructions to record your vote
PHONE Call 1-866-895-6890
• Use any touch-tone telephone
• Have your Proxy Card ready
• Follow the simple recorded instructions
MAIL
• Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card
• Fold and return your Proxy Card in the postage-paid
envelope provided
Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
For Stockholders of record as of March 20, 2019 667 Madison Avenue 14, 2023
TIME: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 8:30 AM, Local Time
PLACE: Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., 15415 Katy Freeway
Houston, TX 77094
This proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors New York, New York 10065 Please make your marks like this: Use dark black pencil or pen only VOTE BY: inTeRneT TeLePhOne Call The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the following nominees: Go To 866-895-6890 www.proxypush.com/DO 1: Election of Directors • Use any touch-tone telephone. Directors • Cast your vote online. OR Recommend • Have your Proxy Card/V oting Instruction Form ready. For Against Abstain• View Meeting Documents. • Follow the simple recorded instructions. 01 James S. Tisch For mAiL For 02 Marc Edwards • Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card/V oting Instruction Form. OR 03 Anatol Feygin For • Detach your Proxy Card/V oting Instruction Form. For 04 Paul G. Gaffney II • Return your Proxy Card/V oting Instruction Form in the postage-paid envelope provided. For 05 Edward Grebow For 06 Kenneth I. Siegel
The undersigned hereby appoints Marc EdwardsBernie Wolford, Jr. and David L. Roland, and each or either of them, as the true and For lawful attorneys of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and revocation, and authorizes them, and each of 07 Clifford M. Sobel them, to vote all the shares of capital stock of the CompanyDiamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote at said meeting 08 Andrew H. Tisch For and any adjournment thereof upon the matters specified and upon such other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, conferring authority upon such true and lawful attorneys to vote in their The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting and revoking any proxy heretofore given.
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, For Against Abstain SHARES WILL BE VOTED IDENTICAL TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. In their discretion, the Named Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box (SEE REVERSE SIDE) but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendation. The Named Proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign (on the reverse side) and return this card.
PLEASE BE SURE TO SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY CARD AND MARK ON THE REVERSE SIDE

LOGO


Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Please make your marks like this: X
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE: FOR ON PROPOSALS 1, 2, 4 AND 5
THE ELECTIONBOARD RECOMMENDS THAT AN ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS BE HELD EVERY 1 YEAR.
PROPOSAL YOUR VOTE
BOARD OF THE DIRECTORS IN ITEM 1 AND RECOMMENDS
1. Election of Class II Directors, each to serve until our annual meeting of stockholders in 2026 and until his/her respective successor is duly elected and qualified or until his/her earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal;
FOR THE PROPOSALS IN ITEMS 2 AND 3, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DISCRETION OF THE PERSONS APPOINTED ABOVE WITH 2:
AGAINST
ABSTAIN
1.01 Patrice Douglas
FOR
1.02 Neal P. Goldman
FOR
FOR
AGAINST
ABSTAIN
2. To approve, onhold an advisory basis,vote on executive For RESPECT TO ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. compensation. Allcompensation;
FOR
1YR
2YR
3YR
ABSTAIN
3. To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes by 401(k) Plan participants must be received by 5:00 P.M., Eastern Time, May 13, 2019. 3: T oon executive compensation;
1 YEAR
FOR
AGAINST
ABSTAIN
4. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & For Touche LLP as the independent auditor for our company and its subsidiaries for fiscal year 2019. PROXY TABULATOR 2023;
FOR NOTE: Such
5. To approve amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors; and
FOR
6. The transaction of such other business as may properly come before the annualmeeting.
Check here if you would like to attend the meeting or any DiAmOnD OFFshORe DRiLLing, inc. adjournments thereof. P.O. BOX 8016 cARY, nc 27512-9903 in person.
Authorized Signatures - This section mustMust be completed for your Instructionsinstructions to be executed. Please Sign Here Please Date Above Please Sign Here Please Date Above
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on your stock certificate.account. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the proxy. Please separate carefully at the perforation and return just this portion in the envelope provided.AnnUAL meeTing OF DiAmOnD OFFshORe DRiLLing, inc. Annual Meeting of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (the “Company”) Date: May 15, 2019 to beProxy/Vote Form.
Signature (and Title if applicable)
Date
Signature (if held on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. (Eastern Time) Place: Loews Corporation for Holders as of March 20, 2019 667 Madison Avenue This proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors New York, New York 10065 Please make your marks like this: Use dark black pencil or pen only VOTE BY: inTeRneT TeLePhOne Call The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the following nominees: Go To 866-895-6890 www.proxypush.com/DO 1: Election of Directors • Use any touch-tone telephone. Directors • Cast your vote online. OR Recommend • Have your Proxy Card/V oting Instruction Form ready. For Against Abstain• View Meeting Documents. • Follow the simple recorded instructions. 01 James S. Tisch For mAiL For 02 Marc Edwards • Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card/V oting Instruction Form. OR 03 Anatol Feygin For • Detach your Proxy Card/V oting Instruction Form. For 04 Paul G. Gaffney II • Return your Proxy Card/V oting Instruction Form in the postage-paid envelope provided. For 05 Edward Grebow For 06 Kenneth I. Siegel The undersigned hereby appoints Marc Edwards and David L. Roland, and each or either of them, as the true and For lawful attorneys of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and revocation, and authorizes them, and each of 07 Clifford M. Sobel them, to vote all the shares of capital stock of the Company which the undersigned is entitled to vote at said meeting 08 Andrew H. Tisch For and any adjournment thereof upon the matters specified and upon such other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, conferring authority upon such true and lawful attorneys to vote in their The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting and revoking any proxy heretofore given. THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, For Against Abstain SHARES WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE DIRECTORS IN ITEM 1 AND FOR THE PROPOSALS IN ITEMS 2 AND 3, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DISCRETION OF THE PERSONS APPOINTED ABOVE WITH 2: To approve, on an advisory basis, executive For RESPECT TO ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. compensation. All votes by 401(k) Plan participants must be received by 5:00 P.M., Eastern Time, May 13, 2019. 3: T o ratify the appointment of Deloitte & For Touche LLP as the independent auditor for our company and its subsidiaries for fiscal year 2019. PROXY TABULATOR FOR NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or any DiAmOnD OFFshORe DRiLLing, inc. adjournments thereof. P.O. BOX 8016 cARY, nc 27512-9903 Authorized Signatures - This section must be completed for your Instructions to be executed. Please Sign Here Please jointly)
Date Above Please Sign Here Please Date Above Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on your stock certificate. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the proxy. Please separate carefully at the perforation and return just this portion in the envelope provided.


LOGO

Please separate carefully at the perforation and return just this portion in the envelope provided. Proxy — Diamond Offshore Drilling, inc. (the “company”) Annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Wednesday, may 15, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. (eastern Time) This Proxy is solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors The undersigned appoints Marc Edwards and David L. Roland (the “Named Proxies”) and each of them as proxies for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote the shares of common stock of the Company that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at the at the offices of Loews Corporation, 667 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10065, on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. (Eastern Time) and all adjournments thereof. The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to take action on the following: 1. T o elect eight directors, each to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal; 2. To approve, on an advisory basis, executive compensation; and 3. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent auditor for our company and its subsidiaries for fiscal year 2019; 4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournments thereof. The eight directors nominated for re-election are: James S. Tisch, Marc Edwards, Anatol Feygin, Paul G. Gaffney II, Edward Grebow, Kenneth I. Siegel, Clifford M. Sobel and Andrew H. Tisch. The Board of Directors of the Company recommends a vote “FOR” all nominees for director and “FOR” the items in proposals 2 and 3. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. if no direction is made, this proxy will be voted “FOR” all nominees for director and “FOR” the items in proposals 2 and 3. in their discretion, the named Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters that may properly come before the Annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box (see ReVeRse siDe) but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendation. The named Proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign and return this card. To attend the meeting and vote your shares in person, please mark this box.Please separate carefully at the perforation and return just this portion in the envelope provided. Proxy — Diamond Offshore Drilling, inc. (the “company”) Annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Wednesday, may 15, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. (eastern Time) This Proxy is solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors The undersigned appoints Marc Edwards and David L. Roland (the “Named Proxies”) and each of them as proxies for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote the shares of common stock of the Company that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at the at the offices of Loews Corporation, 667 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10065, on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. (Eastern Time) and all adjournments thereof. The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to take action on the following: 1. T o elect eight directors, each to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal; 2. To approve, on an advisory basis, executive compensation; and 3. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent auditor for our company and its subsidiaries for fiscal year 2019; 4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournments thereof. The eight directors nominated for re-election are: James S. Tisch, Marc Edwards, Anatol Feygin, Paul G. Gaffney II, Edward Grebow, Kenneth I. Siegel, Clifford M. Sobel and Andrew H. Tisch. The Board of Directors of the Company recommends a vote “FOR” all nominees for director and “FOR” the items in proposals 2 and 3. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. if no direction is made, this proxy will be voted “FOR” all nominees for director and “FOR” the items in proposals 2 and 3. in their discretion, the named Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters that may properly come before the Annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box (see ReVeRse siDe) but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendation. The named Proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign and return this card. To attend the meeting and vote your shares in person, please mark this box.